Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libminiupnpc10.html
Bug #749560 [release.debian.org] transition: miniupnpc
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libminiupnpc10.html'.
--
749560: http://bugs.debian.org
Processing changes file: eglibc_2.13-38+deb7u2_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: eglibc_2.13-38+deb7u2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: eglibc_2.13-38+deb7u2_powerpc.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Processing changes file: eglibc_2.13-38+deb7u2_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: eglibc_2.13-38+deb7u2_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: eglibc_2.13-38+deb7u2_s390.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "u
Hi Thomas,
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 12:40:35 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Note that I would like this transition to happen ASAP, because of #748913.
>
Can't that fix be applied independently?
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 04:29:59 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> I'll ping you when the new core packages pass through NEW, OK?
>
Sounds great, thanks!
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing changes file: eglibc_2.13-38+deb7u2_s390x.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1wpwt8-0007pe...@franck.debian.org
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 19:54 -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Now that libav transitioned to testing, and
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/ says '100%' next to the libav
> transition, what's left to be done here?
The old libraries need to be removed from testing.
britney's trying that, but
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
I wish to upload miniupnpc version 1.9.20140401, which bumped the SONAME
to 10. Affected packages (as per apt-rdepends):
Reverse Depends: 0ad (>= 0.0.16-2+b1)
Reverse Depends: bitco
On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 23:18:06 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On 13/05/14 04:29, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Friday, May 02, 2014 20:07:00 Matthias Klose wrote:
> >> Package: release.debian.org
> >>
> >> Jessie should ship with Python 3.4 as the default, and
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 12:44:45PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Yavor, is there any plan to do the transition? #673538 didn't look
> like it was blocking on us.
Please accept my apologies for being MIA for so long.
I have the new GNUstep core packages ready at mentors.d.n (targeted
for experiment
Now that libav transitioned to testing, and
https://release.debian.org/transitions/ says '100%' next to the libav
transition, what's left to be done here?
Best,
Reinhard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 12:45:08AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> There are various build failures, see:
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=graphviz%2Cmarisa%2Cngraph-gtk%2Cnotmuch%2Cobexftp%2Credland-bindings%2Csubtle%2Czeroc-ice%2Cruby-pgplot%2Ctreil%2Cvim&suite=sid
gah
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 09:55:53PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> tags 747609 + confirmed pending
> forwarded 747609 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ruby2.0-rm.html
> thanks
Thanks!
> On 10/05/14 19:24, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 12:51:25PM +0200, Chri
Processing changes file: eglibc_2.13-38+deb7u2_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ruby-actionpack-3.2_3.2.6-6+deb7u2_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: rxvt-unicode_9.15-2+deb7u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: rxvt-unicode_9.15-2+deb7u1_armel.changes
ACC
On 27/05/14 22:06, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 20/05/14 15:21, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 09:57:31AM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>>> Hello, in order to get rid of dependencies on ruby2.0, please schedule
>>> NMUs for the following source packages:
>>>
>
>>> kross-
On 27/05/14 23:09, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> Le mardi 27 mai 2014 à 16:45 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
>> On 27/05/14 16:24, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> I was going to ack this, but I just realized it failed to build on powerpc.
>>
>> 15:42 < sebastien> pochu: the libofx6 ppc FTB
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 09:32 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 12:38:05PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sun, 2014-05-25 at 20:37 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > We would like to fix a some issues that have been identified in the
> > > eglibc
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #749266 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package eglibc/2.13-38+deb7u2
Added tag(s) pending.
--
749266: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=749266
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUB
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 748169 with 749454 749463 749487 749488 749493
Bug #748169 [release.debian.org] transition: wxwidgets3.0
748169 was blocked by: 748715 744115 749140 741580 741732 741988 749463 741391
742576 738849 741072 749487 743334 748085 749454 748639
Processing changes file: suds_0.3.9-1+deb6u2_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1wpozk-0006pc...@franck.debian.org
Processing changes file: suds_0.4.1-5+deb7u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1wpoyb-0006l2...@franck.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 748382 + confirmed pending
Bug #748382 [release.debian.org] transition: libofx6
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
748382: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=7
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On 13/05/14 04:29, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Friday, May 02, 2014 20:07:00 Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>>
>> Jessie should ship with Python 3.4 as the default, and with 3.4 as the only
>> Python3 version. So lets start with making 3.4 the de
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #746709 [release.debian.org] transition: python3 -- change the default to
3.4
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
746709: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=746709
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Le mardi 27 mai 2014 à 16:45 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
> On 27/05/14 16:24, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > I was going to ack this, but I just realized it failed to build on powerpc.
>
> 15:42 < sebastien> pochu: the libofx6 ppc FTBFS is indeed linked to
> parallelism;
> I plan t
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 746741 transition: python-support removal
Bug #746741 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org: dh-python2 transition
Changed Bug title to 'transition: python-support removal' from
'release.debian.org: dh-python2 transition'
> thanks
Stopp
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #749366 [release.debian.org] squeeze-pu: package suds/0.3.9-1+deb6u2
Bug#749073
Added tag(s) pending.
--
749366: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=749366
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 12:19 +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> * Adam D. Barratt: " Bug#749366: squeeze-pu: package suds/0.3.9-1+deb6u2
> Bug#749073" (Mon, 26 May 2014 19:57:33 +0100):
[...]
> > On Mon, 2014-05-26 at 18:08 +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> > > the original f
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 12:19 +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> * Adam D. Barratt: " Bug#749368: wheezy-pu: package suds/0.4.1-5+deb7u1 Bugs
> #749073 + #714340" (Mon, 26 May 2014 19:55:53 +0100):
>
> > Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> >
> > On Mon, 2014-05-26 at 18:14 +020
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #749368 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package suds/0.4.1-5+deb7u1 Bugs
#749073 + #714340
Added tag(s) pending.
--
749368: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=749368
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
On 05/05/14 15:46, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 07:48:03 +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>>
>> Dear release team,
>>
>> Debian python teams would find useful to evaluate on continuous basis
>> removal of python-support from
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 22:19:52 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 27-05-14 15:16, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Aside from
> > lazarus itself, doing so would break optgeo, which has a
> > build-dependency on lazarus-ide-1.2.
>
> Is there any reason why this isn't shown in the excuses on the
> packages
Control: tags 745603 + confirmed
On 27/05/14 16:22, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Hey again,
>
> I have uploaded php-mysql-ms and xcache with PHP 5.6 support to
> experimental,
> and that resolved the rest of the blocking bugs, so I think we are good
> to go and
> upload.
>
>>From a quick glance I don't
Processing control commands:
> tags 745603 + confirmed
Bug #745603 [release.debian.org] transition: php5
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
745603: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=745603
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 27-05-14 15:16, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Aside from
> lazarus itself, doing so would break optgeo, which has a
> build-dependency on lazarus-ide-1.2.
Is there any reason why this isn't shown in the excuses on the
packages.qa page? Usually these kind of dependencies are shown, aren't they?
Anyw
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 748169 + pending confirmed
Bug #748169 [release.debian.org] transition: wxwidgets3.0
Added tag(s) confirmed and pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
748169: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/
On 20/05/14 15:21, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 09:57:31AM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>> Hello, in order to get rid of dependencies on ruby2.0, please schedule
>> NMUs for the following source packages:
>>
>> kross-interpreters
That one seems fine now.
I have also ignore
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 747609 + confirmed pending
Bug #747609 [release.debian.org] transition: ruby2.0 removal
Added tag(s) confirmed and pending.
> forwarded 747609 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ruby2.0-rm.html
Bug #747609 [release.debian.org] transi
tags 747609 + confirmed pending
forwarded 747609 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ruby2.0-rm.html
thanks
On 10/05/14 19:24, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 12:51:25PM +0200, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
>> During the ruby1.9.1-rm transition we discovered very late in
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #677800 [release.debian.org] transition: libgnokii7
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
677800: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677800
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 17/06/12 03:02, Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote:
> On 16/06/12 22:36, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> more than a month after this mail, it looks like it's really too late:
>> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2012/05/msg4.html
>
> Oh, that was sort of an im
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 736150 - moreinfo
Bug #736150 [release.debian.org] transition: libexosip2
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
736150: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=7361
Your message dated Tue, 27 May 2014 17:17:43 +0200
with message-id <5384ac97.4040...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#740090: transition: libiodbc2
has caused the Debian Bug report #740090,
regarding transition: libiodbc2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #736150 [release.debian.org] transition: libexosip2
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
736150: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736150
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 20/04/14 08:46, Mark Purcell wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Mar 2014 19:37:52 Julien Cristau wrote:
>> Are there any API changes? Have the reverse deps been build tested?
>
> Julien,
>
> No API changes apparent.
>
> sipwitch binNMU OK
> linphone binNMU OK
>
> Updated B
On 27/05/14 16:24, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> I was going to ack this, but I just realized it failed to build on powerpc.
15:42 < sebastien> pochu: the libofx6 ppc FTBFS is indeed linked to parallelism;
I plan to disable it in the next upload
Please go ahead with the transition then.
Emilio
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #745273 [release.debian.org] transition: libccrtp
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
745273: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=745273
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 20/04/14 08:38, Mark Purcell wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Dear release team,
>
> Request a transition slot for a fairly self contained ccrtp.
Please go ahead.
Emil
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #748382 [release.debian.org] transition: libofx6
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
748382: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=748382
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 16/05/14 20:09, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Dear Release Team,
>
> Please schedule a transition for libofx.
>
> The 5 reverse build-deps (gnucas
Hey again,
I have uploaded php-mysql-ms and xcache with PHP 5.6 support to
experimental,
and that resolved the rest of the blocking bugs, so I think we are good
to go and
upload.
>From a quick glance I don't see any clashing transition, so that's also
good, right?
Could you please ack?
Thank yo
On 16/05/14 20:09, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Dear Release Team,
>
> Please schedule a transition for libofx.
>
> The 5 reverse build-deps (gnucash, grisbi, homebank, kmymone
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 19/03/14 03:20, Mike Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 23:01:51 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> Are there bugs tracking the needed changes in the reverse deps?
>
> Bugs are now filed and set to block this bug.
I see that those bugs are now fixed in unstable. I
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #740993 [release.debian.org] transition: openconnect
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
740993: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=740993
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
On 2014-05-27 13:30, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 2014-05-27 13:12, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
The Britney output is odd because it seems to implicate those specific
architectures where the arch:all packages were uninstallable anyway;
but the rename affects *all* arches...
The britney output is on
On 2014-05-27 13:12, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 26/05/14 19:41, Paul Gevers wrote:
Is it because some binaries (arch:all) got
renamed and decrufting scripts only pick this up after 10 days?
I don't think the decruft is automatic, ftpmaster might possibly notice
it in the cruft report, or you
Hi,
On 26/05/14 19:41, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Is it because some binaries (arch:all) got
> renamed and decrufting scripts only pick this up after 10 days?
I don't think the decruft is automatic, ftpmaster might possibly notice
it in the cruft report, or you could specifically file a request with
th
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 748169 with 749454 749463 749487 749488
Bug #748169 [release.debian.org] transition: wxwidgets3.0
748169 was blocked by: 748715 744115 749140 741580 741732 741988 741391 742576
741072 738849 743334 748085 748639 742031 748722 729677 748634
* Adam D. Barratt: " Bug#749368: wheezy-pu: package suds/0.4.1-5+deb7u1 Bugs
#749073 + #714340" (Mon, 26 May 2014 19:55:53 +0100):
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Mon, 2014-05-26 at 18:14 +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> > somehow the original fix for CVE-2013-2217 never got into wheezy. Th
* Adam D. Barratt: " Bug#749366: squeeze-pu: package suds/0.3.9-1+deb6u2
Bug#749073" (Mon, 26 May 2014 19:57:33 +0100):
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Mon, 2014-05-26 at 18:08 +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> > the original fix for CVE-2013-2217 was missing a proper cleanup of the
> > cach
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 12:38:05PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Sun, 2014-05-25 at 20:37 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > We would like to fix a some issues that have been identified in the
> > eglibc version included in wheezy. The best is probably to descri
61 matches
Mail list logo
