Processing control commands:
> block 735557 by -1
Bug #735557 [release.debian.org] transition: octave3.8
735557 was not blocked by any bugs.
735557 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 735557: 736392
--
735557: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=735557
736392: http:/
On 2014-01-22 22:44, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Have you checked the resulting package, beyond confirming that it
> installs? I'd be particularly interested in a full binary debdiff; I
> realise this is "just" a no-change rebuild, but the previous upload was
> pre-lenny.
$ debdiff nana_2.5-12_amd64.
On 22/01/14 22:23, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> Given that libopenscenegraph80 is uninstallable (it depends on the
> no-longer-existing libavcodec53/libavformat53/libavutil51), keeping it
> around doesn't actually help its reverse dependencies; how should this
> be dealt with? (request its removal? r
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 10:32 PM, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
> 0.8.11~git20120629-1+deb7u1, please. Other than that, assuming the
> resulting package has been tested on a wheezy system, please go ahead;
> thanks.
Just uploaded.
Thanks for your time.
--
G..e
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-rel
choreonoid and ossim turned out to also FTBFS (for
non-openscenegraph-related reasons); I have posted a patch for
choreonoid (#735891), and suggested that ossim (#735814) move to the
already-fixed version in the UbuntuGIS PPA.
this no longer blocks anything else or needs to be handled
as a t
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Sun, 2014-01-12 at 03:16 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Followup-For: Bug #735020
>
> Better let's add a dummy prerm to also cover upgrading nana after dpkg.
Have you checked the resulting package, beyond confirming that it
installs? I'd be particularly intereste
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #735020 [release.debian.org] pu: package nana/2.5-12+deb7u1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
735020: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=735020
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 18:12 +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > I have prepared an update for Glance over here:
> > http://archive.gplhost.com/pub/security/glance/
>
> The security tracker lists this issue as potentially open in
> Wheezy: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2013-4354
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 17:34 +0100, intrig...@debian.org wrote:
> as described on #736254, a memory allocation bug in Wheezy's
> libglib-object-introspection-perl causes segfaults in
> reverse-dependencies (#695838).
>
> I've tracked this down to a single upstream comm
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #736257 [release.debian.org] pu: package
libglib-object-introspection-perl/0.009-1+deb7u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
736257: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736257
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org wi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 735399 + wheezy
Bug #735399 [release.debian.org] pu: package policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-7
Added tag(s) wheezy.
> tags 736257 + wheezy
Bug #736257 [release.debian.org] pu: package
libglib-object-introspection-perl/0.009-1+deb7u1
Added tag(s) whe
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #729998 [release.debian.org] pu: package gnash/0.8.11~git20120629-1+wheezy1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
729998: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=729998
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
-
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Sat, 2014-01-11 at 18:41 +0100, Gabriele Giacone wrote:
> Attached a smaller debdiff: removed useless ifdefs according to wheezy
> libav versions.
> libavcodec 533500
> libavformat 532101
> libavutil 512201
+gnash (0.8.11~git20120629-1+wheezy1) stable; urgenc
Hi Niels,
I admit I want to sort out something with qiime to let version 1.8
migrate to testing. The old version in testing (1.4) was quite
unimportant compared to what we need to do with latest upstream.
So thanks for your offer but there is no need to create manual work for
you anyway.
Thanks
On 2014-01-22 00:43, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On 21/01/14 18:45, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> However, it is kicked because of an "old libffi" dependency. I realised
>> that it had in fact
>>
>>libffi6 (>= 3.0.4)
>>
>> in its dependencies which was included via
>>
>>${shlibs:Depends} or
>>
It looks like there are only two blocking bugs left on the tiff
transition and only one of them applies to a package that's in testing
(gimp). After these issues are resolved, will it be time for me to
request removal of the tiff3 package? If not, what is the trigger that
the time has come to req
Hi Adam (2014.01.22_21:47:50_+0200)
> I'm assuming the changes below are part of the original Ubuntu patch,
> but they seem slightly odd given that none of the subsequent changes
> appear to be compression-related; I may well be missing something
> however.
Yeah, they're just removing unused impor
Package: tuxguitar
Version: 1.2-13
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-release@lists.debian.org
Hi,
The version of tuxguitar in wheezy still depends on xulrunner-10.0,
whereas wheezy now has iceweasel 17 and will shortly (at least via
-security) have 24.
Would it be possible to update the p
Package: conkeror
Version: 1.0~~pre+git120527-1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-release@lists.debian.org
Hi,
The version of conkeror in wheezy still depends on xulrunner-10.0,
whereas wheezy now has iceweasel 17 and will shortly (at least via
-security) have 24.
Would it be possible to
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + wheezy confirmed
Bug #736290 [release.debian.org] pu: package pdns/3.1-4
Added tag(s) wheezy and confirmed.
--
736290: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736290
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To U
Control: tags -1 + wheezy confirmed
On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 01:02 +0100, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> pdns-server in stable has shipped with old SQL schema files, having
> both records.content and supermasters.ip too short.
+pdns (3.1-4.1) stable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + wheezy confirmed
Bug #736260 [release.debian.org] pu: package lazr.restfulclient/0.12.0-2
Added tag(s) wheezy and confirmed.
--
736260: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736260
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with p
Control: tags -1 + wheezy confirmed
On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 19:07 +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Hi. Paul Wise reported launchpadlib cache corruption in the Debian wiki
> in #736259.
>
> It looks like the concurrency improvements in lazr.restfulclient 0.13.1
> helped with the issue, and he's now ru
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 719227 + pending
Bug #719227 [release.debian.org] transition: poppler 0.22
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
719227: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=719227
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #706895 [release.debian.org] transition: db5.3
Bug #658829 [release.debian.org] transition: db5.3
Added tag(s) pending.
Added tag(s) pending.
--
658829: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658829
706895: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bi
Control: tag -1 pending
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 16:51:10 +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Uploaded, thanks.
>
Telling the bug.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:41:32 +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Niels Thykier wrote (11 Dec 2013 18:42:44 GMT) :
> > On 2013-12-11 07:54, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> >> Package: release.debian.org
> >> Severity: normal
> >> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> >> Usertags: binnmu
> >>
>
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2014 15:21:32 +0100
with message-id <20140122142132.gc4...@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#714355: nmu: djview4_4.9-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #714355,
regarding nmu: djview4_4.9-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2014 15:20:58 +0100
with message-id <20140122142058.gb4...@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#712604: nmu: python-scientific_2.9.2-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #712604,
regarding nmu: python-scientific_2.9.2-4
to be marked as done.
This means that
Hi,
2014/1/21 intrigeri :
> Hi,
>
> Teodor, ping?
I don't have the necessary experience to make this source debdiff.
Thomas, are you still interested in uploading this (simple) patch for
squeeze?
Cheers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "uns
Hi,
Steffen Möller wrote (22 Jan 2014 11:11:02 GMT) :
> I would happily see the binary removed. Who do I do this?
> Through reportbug?
My understanding is that it requires a stable proposed update, with
a debdiff that stops building the binary package you want to
see removed.
> Is there also a w
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:46:04AM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote (15 Nov 2013 16:40:40 GMT) :
> >> Ping?
>
> > Yes the upstream is working on a clean solution.
> > So I am waiting for the next release which should fix this problem.
>
> Did I understand correctly
> Thijs Kinkhorst wrote (02 May 2013 07:51:28 GMT) :
> > Isn't it possible to fix these vulnerabilities through a DSA or in the
> > first point release? Or alternatively remove the binary package in the
> > first point release?
>
> Steffen, what are your plans regarding this (now kind of old)
> RM
Hi,
PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote (15 Nov 2013 16:40:40 GMT) :
>> Ping?
> Yes the upstream is working on a clean solution.
> So I am waiting for the next release which should fix this problem.
Did I understand correctly that this won't be fixed via a binnmu?
If so, I suppose that this request co
Hi,
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote (02 May 2013 07:51:28 GMT) :
> Isn't it possible to fix these vulnerabilities through a DSA or in the
> first point release? Or alternatively remove the binary package in the
> first point release?
Steffen, what are your plans regarding this (now kind of old)
RM request?
Hi,
Niels Thykier wrote (11 Dec 2013 18:42:44 GMT) :
> On 2013-12-11 07:54, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: binnmu
>>
>> nmu transmission_2.82-1 . ALL . -m "rebuild with newer libminiupnpc"
> No
Hi,
Julien Cristau wrote (30 Sep 2013 08:51:28 GMT) :
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:45:51 +0100, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:
[...]
>> nmu djview4_4.9-3 . ALL . -m "unify libtiff dependency, thanks to Harald
>> Jenny for noting the issue"
>>
> What does that mean? What issue?
I see djview4 4.9-4
Hi,
Daniel Pocock wrote (21 Jan 2014 17:55:15 GMT) :
> On 21/01/14 18:43, intrigeri wrote:
>> Jonathan Wiltshire wrote (25 Sep 2013 21:59:15 GMT) :
I could provide a diff that eliminates changes in such files.
>>
>>> Yes, please.
>>
>> AFAICT, this stable proposed update has been blocking o
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2014 11:36:36 +0100
with message-id <85mwiogv63@boum.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#698778: preapproval of expect/5.45-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #698778,
regarding pu: expect/5.45-2+deb7u1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 717493 - moreinfo
Bug #717493 [release.debian.org] pu: package sympa/6.1.11~dfsg-5.1~deb7u1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
717493: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugr
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
Nicolas Delvaux wrote (19 Dec 2013 22:46:25 GMT) :
> Here is a new version proposal, this time taking the traditional path
> of patching the current stable package.
> The debdiff is shorter/easier to review than the one based on the new
> upstream version, but I would s
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 - moreinfo
Bug #725142 [release.debian.org] pu: package totem-plugin-arte/3.2.1-1~wheezy1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
725142: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725142
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
Hi,
Adam D. Barratt wrote (04 Dec 2013 20:31:44 GMT) :
> On Sun, 2013-11-03 at 14:05 +0530, Rahul Amaram wrote:
>> Updated zoneinfo data
> Is there a plan for doing so in unstable?
Ping?
Regards,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fi
Hi,
Cyril Brulebois wrote (07 Oct 2013 08:41:17 GMT) :
> Nobuhiro Iwamatsu (2013-10-07):
>> I'd like to propose an upgrade of opencv.
>>
>> opencv distributed in wheezy includes source code of non-free (#724920).
>> I want to solve this problem.
>> Source code of the target is the code for test.
Hi,
Joachim Zobel wrote (06 Dec 2013 07:20:30 GMT) :
> The issue has been discussed on the debian java mailing list, see the
> discussion following
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2013/11/msg00100.html
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2013/12/msg2.html
> It was found that a build
On Wed, 22 Jan 2014 08:26:56 +0100 (CET)
"Steffen Möller" wrote:
> The problem with the qiime removal imho is less the extra work that
> you ask for, but the message sent to our users of testing that they
> cannot rely on us - I know it says "testing", but this is exactly
> what they should be al
46 matches
Mail list logo
