Bug#734672: pu: package subversion/1.6.17dfsg-4+deb7u5

2014-01-08 Thread James McCoy
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Subversion's transition to the non-versioned ruby-svn package didn't make it into Wheezy. Since ruby1.8 is planning on being removed for Jessie, the libsvn-ruby1.8 → ruby-svn transition should b

Bug#734650: transition: perl 5.18.2

2014-01-08 Thread gregor herrmann
On Wed, 08 Jan 2014 22:52:00 +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: > Affected packages that we know of are (hope I got this right) > > is_affected: ".depends ~ /perl \(<< 5\.18/" > bad: ".depends ~ /perl \(<< 5\.18\.2/" > good: ".depends ~ /perl \(<< 5\.18\.3/" > > which would currently yield > > nmu li

Bug#734650: transition: perl 5.18.2

2014-01-08 Thread Niko Tyni
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 10:52:00PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: > Perl 5.18.2 was released on Monday. This is an ABI-compatible maintenance > release, see the upstream policy at > > http://search.cpan.org/~jesse/perl-5.14.0/pod/perlpolicy.pod#MAINTENANCE_BRANCHES Sorry, that should of course have be

Processed: block 734650 with 734651

2014-01-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 734650 with 734651 Bug #734650 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.18.2 734650 was not blocked by any bugs. 734650 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 734650: 734651 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me i

Bug#734650: transition: perl 5.18.2

2014-01-08 Thread Niko Tyni
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: p...@packages.debian.org Perl 5.18.2 was released on Monday. This is an ABI-compatible maintenance release, see the upstream policy at http://search.cpan.org/~jesse/perl-5.14.0/pod/perlpol

Bug#725823: pu: package icedove/3.0.11-1+squeeze15

2014-01-08 Thread Carsten Schoenert
Hello, On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 09:30:26PM +0200, Carsten Schoenert wrote: > Any chances to get this change into the next point release for Squeeze? the next point release will for Squeeze is comming in february as far as I can see. What about this bug to take place into the next point release? R

Re: Scheduling 7.4 and 6.0.9

2014-01-08 Thread Neil McGovern
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 05:50:27AM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Our "standard" time intervals lead to us looking at point releases for > both stable and oldstable during February. > > The weekend of the 1st / 2nd February is FOSDEM, so probably best avoided. :-) > How are people fixed for: > >

Processed: bug 728919 is forwarded to https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/freebsd-libs.html

2014-01-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 728919 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/freebsd-libs.html Bug #728919 [release.debian.org] transition: freebsd-libs Changed Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/freebsd-libs.html' from 'ht

Bug#734588: Acknowledgement (transition sdlgfx 2.0.23 to 2.0.25)

2014-01-08 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Sorry for don't adding the binnmu tag, but this package isn't uploaded yet. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1389178176.5046.yahoomail...@web171802.m

Bug#734588: transition sdlgfx 2.0.23 to 2.0.25

2014-01-08 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition (opening a bug, sorry for double posting) Hi debian release Managers! Together with Manuel (the sdlgfx uploader, who reads in cc), we decided to ask for a transition the package can b

Re: Scheduling 7.4 and 6.0.9

2014-01-08 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 05:50:27AM +, Adam Barratt wrote: >Hi, > >Our "standard" time intervals lead to us looking at point releases for >both stable and oldstable during February. > >The weekend of the 1st / 2nd February is FOSDEM, so probably best avoided. :-) >How are people fixed for: > >8t

Re: Scheduling 7.4 and 6.0.9

2014-01-08 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, On 01/08/2014 06:50 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > How are people fixed for: > > 8th / 9th February > 15th / 16th February > 22nd / 23rd February > 1st / 2nd March I'm still free on all dates. Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "uns

Bug#734099: CVE for vulnerability now available: CVE-2013-7262

2014-01-08 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
> On 2014-01-08 7:51, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> Control: tags -1 security >> >> As reported by Salvatore Bonaccorso in #734565, there is now a CVE for >> the security issue in question. >> >> Can I get a Go/No Go for uploading the proposed changes in the debdiff? > > You proposed the changes

Bug#734099: CVE for vulnerability now available: CVE-2013-7262

2014-01-08 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 2014-01-08 7:51, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: Control: tags -1 security As reported by Salvatore Bonaccorso in #734565, there is now a CVE for the security issue in question. Can I get a Go/No Go for uploading the proposed changes in the debdiff? You proposed the changes four days ago, inc