Hi,
Quoting peter green (2013-11-28 01:12:57)
> One problem with these metrics is that you get source packages whose
> importance is artifically inflated because of the way our source packages
> work. If anything in a source package needs x then the whole source package
> has to build-depend on x.
Instead of dwelling on this discovery, which is not productive, why not
concentrate on what to do to improve Debian.
The analysis has shown faults. Has Debian stopped working? Has the world
crashed?
The problems have been identified, the patches to address the issues are being
evaluated and
On 28 November 2013 00:04, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Hi josch!
>
> On 27/11/13 17:58, Johannes Schauer wrote:
>> http://mister-muffin.de/p/Gid8.txt
>>
>> One can see that now the amount of source packages which is needed to build
>> the
>> rest of the archive is only 383.
>
> So, there are 383
Johannes Schauer wrote:
Hi,
the following is a report of a successful implementation of what I have been
talking about with Niels Thykier during debconf13. The question was how
important it is for a source package to be compilable or exist in the first
place given an incomplete port which is in
Hi josch!
On 27/11/13 17:58, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> http://mister-muffin.de/p/Gid8.txt
>
> One can see that now the amount of source packages which is needed to build
> the
> rest of the archive is only 383.
So, there are 383 packages that share the same, maximum value (in this
case 11657) i
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 729071 + pending
Bug #729071 [release.debian.org] transition: libmatroska
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
729071: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=729071
Hi,
the following is a report of a successful implementation of what I have been
talking about with Niels Thykier during debconf13. The question was how
important it is for a source package to be compilable or exist in the first
place given an incomplete port which is in the process of being boots
On 2013-11-16 15:57, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> According to the normal schedule, the point release for 7.3 is due
> somewhere around 12th December.
>
> How does everybody look for the weekends of:
> 14th/15th
Maybe; but I'd prefer one of the other two suggestions.
> 21st/22nd
> 28th/29th Decem
CCing the release.d.o bug.
Marcin: As you already stated, Calligra won't switch to libpqxx4 but to libpq.
But that will happen (hopefully) early next year.
We really don't want to drop psql support. Is there any chance to have
libpqxx3 back with a bigger epoch until that release? The dev packag
On 2013-11-26 22:35:36, Julien Cristau wrote:
> calligra FTBFS: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=calligra
Hi Julien,
Thx for the info, but I'm not sure if there is anything I can do about it as it
looks like upstream bug. I just filled a bug (#730632) against calligra
package.
I th
Package: ben
Version: 0.6.6
Severity: normal
Le 09/02/2012 18:21, Niels Thykier a écrit :
>> While this post-processing of generated HTML files is kind of ugly, it
>> makes it easy to show which transitions might be entangled due to
>> collisions.
>> [...]
>
> I am in favor of using this as a tem
11 matches
Mail list logo
