Salut KiBi,
Appreciate the personalised email! Thanks for looking out.
On 7 October 2013 at 01:30, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
| Hi,
|
| it looks like libquantlib-1.2 got dropped from the quantlib source
| package.
Yup. "We" (ie myself as maintainer and IIRC the ftpmasters) decided that the
libquan
Hi,
looking at the testing summary page for d-i, I noticed win32-loader is
blocked from automatic migration. I'm not sure whether we want to keep
it that way but at least the 0.7.4.9 release currently in sid shouldn't
hurt AFAICT; some bits of "modernity" on the source side, and updated
Built-Usin
Hi,
we currently have:
| libsigrok (0.1.1-1 to 0.2.0-2)
|
| Maintainer: Uwe Hermann
| 35 days old (needed 10 days)
| out of date on armel: libsigrok0 (from 0.1.1-1)
| Not considered
|
| libsigrokdecode (0.1.0-2 to 0.2.0-2)
|
| Maintainer: Uwe Hermann
| 35 days old (need
Hi,
it looks like libquantlib-1.2 got dropped from the quantlib source
package. Am I right in assuming that all maintainers are aware of this,
and doing whatever is needed to update reverse dependencies? Currently,
trying to remove the out of date libquantlib-1.2 binaries from the
archive results
Hi,
you dropped the following binary package from the libewf source
package:
libewf1
It is still needed by the following packages:
| guymager: guymager [amd64 i386 powerpc]
| libewf: ewf-tools [hurd-i386]
| libewf-dbg [hurd-i386]
| libewf-dev [hurd-i386]
| sleuthkit: libtsk3-3
Processing changes file: shotwell_0.12.3-2+deb7u1_mips.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xinetd_2.3.14-7.1+deb7u1_mipsel.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Arch
Hi,
you dropped the following binary package from the yaml-cpp source
package:
libyaml-cpp0.3
It appears it is still depended on by the following packages:
| librime: librime-bin [amd64 armel armhf i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386
powerpc]
| librime0 [amd64 armel armhf i386 kfreebsd-
Processing changes file: shotwell_0.12.3-2+deb7u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: shotwell_0.12.3-2+deb7u1_mipsel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xinetd_2.3.14-7.1+deb7u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a s
Processing changes file: xinetd_2.3.14-7.1+deb7u1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xinetd_2.3.14-7.1+deb7u1_s390.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archi
Processing changes file: shotwell_0.12.3-2+deb7u1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: shotwell_0.12.3-2+deb7u1_sparc.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Arch
Processing changes file: shotwell_0.12.3-2+deb7u1_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: shotwell_0.12.3-2+deb7u1_powerpc.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Arc
Processing changes file: shotwell_0.12.3-2+deb7u1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: shotwell_0.12.3-2+deb7u1_s390.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: shotwell_0.12.3-2+deb7u1_s390x.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xinetd_2.3.14-7.1+deb7u1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing
Hi,
it doesn't appear you coordinated the libtorrent-rasterbar{6,7}
transition with the release team, but I've set up a tracker anyway:
http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libtorrent-rasterbar7.html
Ideally you would have contacted us in advance, waited for a transition
slot, also making
Processing changes file: devscripts_2.12.6+deb7u1_powerpc.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ifmetric_0.3-2+deb7u1_powerpc.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Arc
Hi,
[Cyril Brulebois, 2013-10-06]
> it looks like src:gaupol dropped python-aeidon, which is apparently
> still needed by translate-toolkit; can you please sure this issue is
> tracked down, possibly by opening a bug report against translate-toolkit
> with appropriate instructions?
http://lists.d
-=| Cyril Brulebois, 29.09.2013 22:59:31 +0200 |=-
> looking at it for 7.2 now, sorry it took so long.
Cool. Thanks!
> > The last patch, out/crash-create-db-restricted.patch is for a crash
> > that is claimed fixed in upstream Svn, but the actual commit is
> > missing. I have produced it by loo
Hi Piotr,
it looks like src:gaupol dropped python-aeidon, which is apparently
still needed by translate-toolkit; can you please sure this issue is
tracked down, possibly by opening a bug report against translate-toolkit
with appropriate instructions?
Thanks already.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
D
Processing changes file: shotwell_0.12.3-2+deb7u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vsuie-00054x...@franck.debian.org
On 06/10/13 08:52, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS)
>vice: bugs 693641, flagged for removal in 8.3 days
Bug #693641 is another interesting edge case:
Found in version vice/2.3.dfsg-4 (testing, unstable, stable)
Fixed in version vice/2.4.dfsg-1 (unstable)
Marked as done
But it
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #725477 [release.debian.org] pu: shotwell/0.12.3-2+deb7u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
725477: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725477
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sun, 2013-10-06 at 20:14 +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> 2013/10/6 Adam D. Barratt :
> > Please go ahead (bearing in mind that the window for 7.2 closes today);
> > thanks.
>
> Uploaded, thanks (also thanks for the very fast reply for this late fix).
Flagged for acce
Processing changes file: davfs2_1.4.6-1.1+deb7u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: davfs2_1.4.6-1.1+deb7u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: davfs2_1.4.6-1.1+deb7u1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: davfs2_1.4.6-1.1+deb7u1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing c
Hello,
All rdeps (except tomboy) are building fine with the new soname of the
library.
Unfortunately libproxy still FTBFS due to a test failing (randomly).
Cheers
Laurent Bigonville
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
2013/10/6 Adam D. Barratt :
> Please go ahead (bearing in mind that the window for 7.2 closes today);
> thanks.
Uploaded, thanks (also thanks for the very fast reply for this late fix).
Cheers,
Luca
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscr
Niels Thykier (2013-10-06):
> It looks like this is caused by kfreebsd-8 being marked with
> "Extra-Source-Only: yes", presumably because something lists it in
> "Built-Using". For most parts it means the package is already removed
> but not all tools seem to recognise this e.g. the PTS, the BTS
On 2013-10-06 13:09, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 06/10/13 08:52, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>kfreebsd-8: bugs 720470,717959,720476, flagged for removal in 14.7 days
>
> Not sure why that's appearing in this list because:
> 1. the package was removed from testing over a month ago at the
Processing changes file: xinetd_2.3.14-7.1+deb7u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vsqxz-0007re...@franck.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 723116 + pending
Bug #723116 [release.debian.org] RM (or pu): chmsee -- RoQA; FTBFS with
Iceweasel 17
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
723116: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #725370 [release.debian.org] pu: package xinetd/1:2.3.14-7.1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
725370: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725370
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sun, 2013-10-06 at 13:36 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 11:27:59AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sat, 2013-10-05 at 17:55 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > Anyway, it looks like this is actually a problem with the packaging from
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 724653 with 725495
Bug #724653 [release.debian.org] transition: libproxy
724653 was not blocked by any bugs.
724653 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 724653: 725495
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if y
Hi Niels,
I don't know upto what point you are familiar with my history and its link to
the powerpc
port, but it pains me to see that the powerpc port is left with so few porters,
and that it
may mean the port being dropped. I also have not really followed the mailing
lists since
a long time,
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Lior Kaplan wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Adam D. Barratt <
> a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote:
>
>> On 2013-09-10 9:09, Lior Kaplan wrote:
>> Is there are a plan for an upload for squeeze?
>>
>
> Would be nice, but we didn't ask for it. Having it in
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + wheezy confirmed
Bug #725477 [release.debian.org] pu: shotwell/0.12.3-2+deb7u1
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #725477 to the same tags previously set
--
725477: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725477
Debian Bug Tracking System
Cont
Control: tags -1 + wheezy confirmed
On Sun, 2013-10-06 at 12:00 +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> I'd like to upload a fix for #722909, submitter confirmed the patch
> solves the issue, and is already part of 0.14, which is in Jessie
> already.
Please go ahead (bearing in mind that the window for 7.
Hi Adam,
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 11:27:59AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 +confirmed
>
> On Sat, 2013-10-05 at 17:55 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Anyway, it looks like this is actually a problem with the packaging from
> > 7.1. Unpacking the source package gives:
> >
> >
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + wheezy confirmed
Bug #725477 [release.debian.org] pu: shotwell/0.12.3-2+deb7u1
Added tag(s) wheezy and confirmed.
--
725477: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725477
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
-
Processing changes file: openvrml_0.18.9-5+deb7u1_mips.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vsmkg-0005oj...@franck.debian.org
Hi,
On 06/10/13 08:52, Niels Thykier wrote:
>kfreebsd-8: bugs 720470,717959,720476, flagged for removal in 14.7 days
Not sure why that's appearing in this list because:
1. the package was removed from testing over a month ago at the request
of the maintainer, and
2. when that happened the bug
Hi Adam,
On Sonntag, 6. Oktober 2013, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Uploading slbackup with the change removed would be fine; thanks.
Ok, will (try to) prepare the package today while traveling and shall upload
tomorrow evening at latest.
> debian-edu itself is a little more complicated, as the new
Processing changes file: debian-edu-install_1.720+deb7u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vslob-ca...@franck.debian.org
On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 04:26:55PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > It seems libvncserver was built in an unclean environment on mipsel, which
> > caused it to link against libpng12-0 only on mipsel.
> >
> Sounds like a missing build-conflicts if having extra packages around
> causes issues...
Hi
Control: tags -1 +confirmed
On Sat, 2013-10-05 at 17:55 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Anyway, it looks like this is actually a problem with the packaging from
> 7.1. Unpacking the source package gives:
>
> dpkg-source: info: upstream files that have been modified:
> xinetd-1:2.3.14-7.1/config
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 +confirmed
Bug #725370 [release.debian.org] pu: package xinetd/1:2.3.14-7.1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
725370: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725370
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Sat, 2013-10-05 at 23:46 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> So that leaves three packages: debian-edu, debian-edu-config and slbackup.
>
> Am I right to assume you'd be happy if we'd upload debian-edu with the chmsee
> recommends removed and slbackup with that NACKed change removed? (And you
> con
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 722909 0.14.0-1
Bug #722909 [shotwell] shotwell: Shotwell crashes on library updates
Marked as fixed in versions shotwell/0.14.0-1.
> block 722909 with 725477
Bug #722909 [shotwell] shotwell: Shotwell crashes on library updates
722909 was no
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
I'd like to upload a fix for #722909, submitter confirmed the patch
solves the issue, and is already part of 0.14, which is in Jessie
already.
Debdiff of the change is attached.
Cheers,
Luca
Hi,
This is a friendly reminder. If you are listed below, then the listed
packages of yours will be automatically removed from testing within 15
days. The "first batch" of automatic removals will happen in about 8
days.
Please remember that "fixing" your RC bug(s) can sometimes be as
simple as
"Adam D. Barratt" writes:
> On Sun, 2013-10-06 at 00:22 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> hm, when running "dak ls debian-edu-artwork" on coccia.d.o I see the today
>> uploaded d-e-artwork package in the "accepted" suite, but this aint the case
>> for "dak ls gosa" - any idea why?
>>
>> Same for s
49 matches
Mail list logo
