;t seem to explode too badly either.
Done.
> And since that “take 1” thing isn't over, let's hijack it a bit more:
> feel free to also unblock installation-guide/20130408, which should
> have less junk (.svn/ all over the place) than the previous upload,
> and should be a better
t a bit more:
feel free to also unblock installation-guide/20130408, which should
have less junk (.svn/ all over the place) than the previous upload,
and should be a better fit for testing.
Thanks already.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Bastian.
Niels Thykier (08/04/2013):
> On 2013-04-08 02:02, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > RMs, please unblock/urgent the recently uploaded:
> > netcfg/1.108
> Unblocked.
Meh. Now it's blocked from migrating because:
Invalidated by dependency
Not considered
Depends: netcfg libdebian
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 10:18:14PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 22:56 +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 09:13:43PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2013-04-06 at 16:39 +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > > > Please unblock package asterisk. It i
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 704566 + d-i
Bug #704566 [release.debian.org] unblock: isc-dhcp/4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+deb70u4
Added tag(s) d-i.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
704566: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu
(sorry for the delay, which was to avoid a rash reply)
(quotes have been re-ordered)
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 08:12:15PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 09:07:44PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> >> Please unblock
В Sun, 24 Mar 2013 21:11:34 +
Jonathan Wiltshire пишет:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 08:18:16PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 07:55:41PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > > Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 02:55:54AM +0400, Alexand
В Mon, 08 Apr 2013 21:25:08 +0100
"Adam D. Barratt" пишет:
> On Sun, 2013-03-24 at 21:11 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 08:18:16PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 07:55:41PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Feb 01,
On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 22:56 +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 09:13:43PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sat, 2013-04-06 at 16:39 +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > > Please unblock package asterisk. It includes a number of fixes, mostly
> > > two series of security fixes.
[..
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 09:13:43PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-04-06 at 16:39 +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > Please unblock package asterisk. It includes a number of fixes, mostly
> > two series of security fixes.
>
> It includes a number of things that don't meet the published c
Your message dated Mon, 8 Apr 2013 21:44:28 +0100
with message-id <20130408204428.gn11...@ernie.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#702787: pre-approval: unblock: python-pyrrd/0.1.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #702787,
regarding pre-approval: unblock: python-pyrrd/0.1.0-2
to be
On Sun, 2013-03-24 at 21:11 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 08:18:16PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 07:55:41PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 02:55:54AM +0400, Alexander Golovko wrote:
> > > > Please, unblock
On Sat, 2013-04-06 at 16:39 +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> Please unblock package asterisk. It includes a number of fixes, mostly
> two series of security fixes.
It includes a number of things that don't meet the published criteria,
which is far from ideal for an urgency=high upload at this point i
On Monday 08 April 2013 02:43 PM, Guy Roussin wrote:
>> Just to re-confirm, is the actual bug, that was initially reported by
>> Guy, is that also resolved?
> Yes the bug is resolved. No more errors when "update-initramfs -u"
>
> Thank you,
>
Thank you for confirming.
Given that we are in deep fre
Your message dated Mon, 08 Apr 2013 13:52:57 +0100
with message-id <741e833f9a44be03ae2c4f0c07015...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#688100: unblock: fglrx-driver/1:12-6+point-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #688100,
regarding unblock: fglrx-driver/1:12-6+point-3
to be marke
Hi
On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 12:44:02PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 7 avril 2013 02:34 CEST, Julien Cristau :
>
> >> > your email. I am not using the 1.4.x branch and therefore cannot say if
> >> > 1.4.15 is usable.
> >> >
> >> > Here is what I propose:
> >> >
> >> > - We release with 1.4.
On 2013-02-16 20:59, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2012-12-02 22:17, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> On 2012-12-02 21:37, Michael Gilbert wrote:
The package in wheezy contains incorrect (outdated) information w.r.t.
to support for legacy hardware (as it was written before AMD released
the
Dear release team,
TL;DR: This issue is fixable with 18 binNMUs of which 14 are arch:all.
On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 05:46:57PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> We can move discussion of the conffile issue to a new bug / thread if
> needed.
Let me give you some data on this. The basic issue was firs
08.04.2013 11:57, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Forgot to mention one thing:
>
> Cyril Brulebois (08/04/2013):
>> My take is: until we hit real bugs in real situations, we keep busybox as it
>> is. If release managers want to cherry-pick a few fixes, I won't stop them
>> from requesting so. But as f
Forgot to mention one thing:
Cyril Brulebois (08/04/2013):
> My take is: until we hit real bugs in real situations, we keep busybox
> as it is. If release managers want to cherry-pick a few fixes, I won't
> stop them from requesting so. But as far as I'm concerned, I'd really
> like to see practi
Michael Tokarev (08/04/2013):
> I'm pinging this bug, as we're getting seriously out of time.
Well, if you had Cc'd the right people in the first place…
> > Let me start from scratch please. I wasn't aware of this
> > bugreport/discussion, and I made a mistake by not filing a proper
> > unblock
21 matches
Mail list logo
