Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Sat, 2013-03-23 at 20:58 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> The primary fix is the updated patch for dropping guids; however, it also
> includes an important fix for switching to dh_python2 which currently
> results in no helper being used if built in a minimal chro
Your message dated Sun, 24 Mar 2013 10:49:35 +
with message-id <20130324104935.gc5...@ernie.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#703650: unblock: resiprocate - added missing error
message, more sane TLS config
has caused the Debian Bug report #703650,
regarding unblock: resiprocate
Hi Angel
(dropping the RC bug)
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 12:09:38PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Disclaimer: not part of the release team but noticed #702911 as the
> corresponding #702905 in almanah fixes a security bug.
>
> It looks that your unblock request never went trough the list, a
Your message dated Sun, 24 Mar 2013 10:24:18 +
with message-id <20130324102418.ga5...@ernie.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#703705: unblock: debian-reference/2.50
has caused the Debian Bug report #703705,
regarding unblock: debian-reference/2.50
to be marked as done.
This mean
Control: tags -1 + d-i confirmed
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 14:57:52 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 12:56:42 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
>
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: unblock
> >
> > Ple
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 09:34:51PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Sat, 2013-03-23 at 20:58 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > The primary fix is the updated patch for dropping guids; however, it also
> > includes an important fix for switching to dh_python2 w
Your message dated Sun, 24 Mar 2013 20:49:15 +
with message-id <20130324204915.ga20...@ernie.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#691115: unblock libdvdread/4.2.0+20120521-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #691115,
regarding unblock libdvdread/4.2.0+20120521-3
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Sun, 24 Mar 2013 23:07:47 +
with message-id <20130324230747.ga23...@ernie.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#702786: unblock: inputlirc/23-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #702786,
regarding unblock: inputlirc/23-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + moreinfo
Bug #696564 [release.debian.org] unblock: fusioninventory-agent/2.2.3-5
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
696564: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696564
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBS
Hi Angel and Salvatore,
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 01:44:35PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 12:09:38PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Disclaimer: not part of the release team but noticed #702911 as the
> > corresponding #702905 in almanah fixes a security bug.
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 22:30:59 +0100, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package griffith
>
> I fixed it looong time ago in the trunk. Restoring database from a
> backup i
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 08:18:16PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 07:55:41PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 02:55:54AM +0400, Alexander Golovko wrote:
> > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > Severity: norm
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 703132 + experimental
Bug #703132 [release.debian.org] nmu: python2.7_2.7.3-16
Added tag(s) experimental.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
703132: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?b
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package debootstrap
This upload fixed #703146. The bug is severity "important" but one
might consider it as serious as it prevents debootstreap to create a
pbuilder chroot fo
Your message dated Sun, 24 Mar 2013 20:38:35 +
with message-id <20130324203814.ga19...@ernie.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#689822: Fwd: Bug#689822: release.debian.org: please
accept the package wims_4.03a-8 into testing-proposed-updates
has caused the Debian Bug report #6898
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #702353 [release.debian.org] unblock: python2.7/2.7.3-8
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
702353: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702353
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
Your message dated Sun, 24 Mar 2013 21:17:21 +
with message-id <20130324211721.ga21...@ernie.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#701663: pre-approve unblock: tryton-server/2.2.7-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #701663,
regarding pre-approve unblock: tryton-server/2.2.7-1
to be m
Hi Angel
Disclaimer: not part of the release team but noticed #702911 as the
corresponding #702905 in almanah fixes a security bug.
It looks that your unblock request never went trough the list, as the
debdiff is quite big. At this stage of the release the release team
will probably not acknowled
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #703801 [release.debian.org] tpu: gunicorn/0.14.5-3+deb7u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
703801: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=703801
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 08:57:02PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
>
> On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 05:46:07AM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> > libsocialweb package in testing has a security bug as CVE-2012-4511,
> > and I've cherry-picked a patch from upstream as just 1
Your message dated Sun, 24 Mar 2013 20:59:36 +
with message-id <20130324205936.ga20...@ernie.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#696716: unblock: pyvorbis/1.5-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #696716,
regarding unblock: pyvorbis/1.5-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
Control: tag -1 + confirmed d-i
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 02:14:42AM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Please unblock package e
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + confirmed d-i
Bug #703581 [release.debian.org] unblock: e2fsprogs/1.42.5-1.1
Added tag(s) d-i and confirmed.
--
703581: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=703581
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To U
Your message dated Sun, 24 Mar 2013 21:26:50 +
with message-id <1364160410.24071.37.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#699817: unblock:
gnome-settings-daemon/3.4.2+git20121218.7c1322-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #699817,
regarding unblock: gnome-settings-daemo
Your message dated Sun, 24 Mar 2013 23:08:20 +
with message-id <20130324230820.ga23...@ernie.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#702785: unblock: ifenslave-2.6/1.1.0-21
has caused the Debian Bug report #702785,
regarding unblock: ifenslave-2.6/1.1.0-21
to be marked as done.
This m
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + d-i confirmed
Bug #702167 [release.debian.org] unblock: lvm2/2.02.95-7
Added tag(s) d-i and confirmed.
--
702167: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702167
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBS
Hi,
I uploaded a -7 here http://people.debian.org/~goneri/fusioninventory-agent/
a package without this upstream-fix-backport.diff patch. I everything is ok
for you, I will upload it in Debian.
== Changes
* Drop upstream-fix-backport.diff in order to reduce the size of the
debdiff
* Drop debia
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 00:02:28 +0800, Matthias Klose wrote:
> python2.7 (2.7.3-8) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * python2.7: Replace python2.7-minimal (<< 2.7.3-7). Closes: #702005.
> * Build the _md5, _sha1, _sha256 and _sha512 extension modules.
>
What's the rati
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 699109 RM: tcos/0.89.90
Bug #699109 [release.debian.org] unblock (pre-approval):
initramfs-tools-tcos/0.89.91
Bug #703270 [release.debian.org] RM: tcos/0.89.90
Changed Bug title to 'RM: tcos/0.89.90' from 'unblock (pre-approval):
initram
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 03:17:28PM +0100, Gonéri Le Bouder wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 07:37:39PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Hi Gonéri,
>
> Hi Julien,
>
> > > +
> > > +case "$1" in
> > > + configure)
> > > +[ -d "/etc/fusioninventory" ] || mkdir "/etc/f
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package reportbug
This package fixes the crashes seen with GTK+ UI, which impacted several users.
unblock reportbug/6.4.4
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 04:20:25PM -0430, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote:
> i'll explain..
>
> the kernel are bad.. my kernel are x86 only 3.2.0 from wheeze
>
> so i upgraded mplayer rebuild agains new libogg and goes bad.. then i
> upgrade mplayer sources and rebuild agains libogg (and several others
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Le 24/03/2013 06:37, Jonathan Wiltshire a écrit :
> Provided the diff is clear and isolated, and you can get it turned around
> in the next couple of days, I think I can make this exception.
Thanks Jonathan,
> I wonder if the recent upload of debi
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 07:20:43PM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Unfortunately, while we were having a shiny nice 100% translation
> ratio for 7 languages.we now have a less nice 99%:-)
>
> This 100% was a result of a very hard work by l10n coordinators and a
> great reward to translat
(this should probably move to -devel or somewhere)
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 11:23:32AM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> On 22 March 2013 22:17, Nicolas Boulenguez wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 09:50:07PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> >> > e2fsprogs (1.42.5-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
> >> >
On Sun, 2013-03-24 at 11:29 +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> cpufreqd is in a relatively bad shape, unfortunately I haven't been able
> take care of it as I should have in quite some time.
> One bug seems particularly bad (severity is important at the moment):
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo
36 matches
Mail list logo
