Hello,
Aurelien Jarno (08/01/2013):
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 08:56:45PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Cyril Brulebois (24/11/2012):
> > > From a d-i point of view, this is more than welcome. I haven't
> > > reviewed the patch itself yet, but you can commit it right now,
> > > as d-i wheezy
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 08:56:45PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Cyril Brulebois (24/11/2012):
> > From a d-i point of view, this is more than welcome. I haven't
> > reviewed the patch itself yet, but you can commit it right now,
> > as d-i wheezy beta 4 has just been released. Just remember to
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Dear Release Team,
I would like to update the snacc package enabling multiarch for the
shipped libraries.
The debdiff also adds a watch file which I can remove if its presence
bloc
Hi Niels,
thanks for taking your time to look at this issue more deeply. Your
extra info is very valuable to me and the D-E team.
On Mo 07 Jan 2013 14:34:17 CET Niels Thykier wrote:
On 2013-01-07 12:12, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi Mike,
[...]
Mind you, I am a bit out of my conform zone
Processing changes file: portmidi_184-2+squeeze1_powerpc.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1tslhl-00052e...@franck.debian.org
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #697639 {Done: Julien Cristau } [release.debian.org]
release.debian.org: please upgrade cairo in wheezy
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
697639: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=697639
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.d
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
HI Samuel
Disclaimer: I'm not part of the Release-Team, so answer is not
"authoritative":
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 09:54:57PM +0100, Samuel Wolf wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
>
> please upgrade to cairo/1.12.6-1 in debian wheezy because a
> b
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 20:22:16 +0100, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> 2013/1/6 Julien Cristau :
> > If the symbols are added in this 1.0.1-1.1+deb7u1 version, why did you
> > make the symbols file claim they're in 1.0.1?
>
> I blindly picked those suggested by dh_makeshlibs.
> Should I prepare a new up
Your message dated Mon, 7 Jan 2013 22:01:02 +0100
with message-id <20130107210102.gt5...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#697639: release.debian.org: please upgrade cairo in
wheezy
has caused the Debian Bug report #697639,
regarding release.debian.org: please upgrade cairo in wheezy
to
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
please upgrade to cairo/1.12.6-1 in debian wheezy because a
bug [1] in cairo/1.12.2-2 which breaks the complete text on a printout.
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694789
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
APT prefers t
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 697219 697589
Bug #697219 [release.debian.org] unblock: gnome-menus/3.4.2-6
Bug #697589 [release.debian.org] unblock: gnome-menus/3.4.2-7
Merged 697219 697589
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
2013/1/6 Julien Cristau :
> If the symbols are added in this 1.0.1-1.1+deb7u1 version, why did you
> make the symbols file claim they're in 1.0.1?
I blindly picked those suggested by dh_makeshlibs.
Should I prepare a new upload fixing this?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lis
Processing changes file: xnecview_1.35-5.2_mipsel.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1tsgmu-0005sd...@franck.debian.org
Processing changes file: portmidi_184-2+squeeze1_mipsel.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1tsgyo-00019x...@franck.debian.org
Processing changes file: xnecview_1.35-5.2_sparc.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1tsf9j-0006gd...@franck.debian.org
Processing changes file: portmidi_184-2+squeeze1_sparc.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xnecview_1.35-5.2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Arc
On 2013-01-07 Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 02:20:06PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
> > Due to insufficient quoting it is possible to pass on arbitrary
> > arguments to spfquery and therefore bypass SPF checks. The fix is not
> > invasive, but it changes dpkg conffiles.
[...
Hi Holger,
On Mo 07 Jan 2013 12:12:09 CET Holger Levsen wrote:
keep this change from 0.0.12-4:
* Change in conffile management:
+ Drop CRON job /etc/cron.daily/slbackup. Re-enable configuration
of slbackup via debconf templates (closes: #662914).
+ Remove conffile /etc/cron.dail
HI folks,
There will be a BSP on the weekend of the 25th-27th of January at my
house in Cambridge.
More information in the wiki at
http://wiki.debian.org/BSP/2013/01/gb/Cambridge
and please register there as well if you're going to join us so we can
co-ordinate accommodation, food etc.
Let's
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 09:23:44PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>Hey folks,
>
>Let's have another BSP at my place and get Wheezy ready for
>release. One of the weekends in January sounds like a good option to
>me - please tell us when you can make in the Doodle poll at
>
> http://www.doodle.com/dk
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: britney
Adam, Julien and I talked about this in #d-qa today and it turns out
that Britney cannot reliably distinguish between RC bugs affecting
source packages and RC bugs affecting binary packages.
On 2013-01-07 12:12, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> On Dienstag, 1. Januar 2013, Mike Gabriel wrote:
>> package for wheezy is not possible. For wheezy, slbackup has to be
>> provided via the D-E archive. (Long story [1]). I'll keep the package
>> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.c
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 01:24:29PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 07.01.2013 13:19, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> >On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 01:11:01PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >>I wasn't suggesting getting a new upstream version in to testing.
> >>The fact that the fix for testing is
On 07.01.2013 13:19, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 01:11:01PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I wasn't suggesting getting a new upstream version in to testing.
The fact that the fix for testing is going via tpu doesn't change
the wish to have it fixed in unstable first.
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 01:11:01PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> I wasn't suggesting getting a new upstream version in to testing.
> The fact that the fix for testing is going via tpu doesn't change
> the wish to have it fixed in unstable first.
So, what do you suggest? New upstream version or p
Your message dated Mon, 07 Jan 2013 13:14:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#697578: unblock: abyss/1.3.4-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #697578,
regarding unblock: abyss/1.3.4-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
On 07.01.2013 13:03, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 10:07:51PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Thanks for the confirmation. In general, we prefer that the fixes
are
applied and verified in unstable first, as it's generally easier to
fix
up in the event of any issues. (I
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 10:07:51PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 22:18 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 09:05:37PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > The version information for #679966 looks like it might have got broken
> > > at some poi
Hi Mike,
On Dienstag, 1. Januar 2013, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> package for wheezy is not possible. For wheezy, slbackup has to be
> provided via the D-E archive. (Long story [1]). I'll keep the package
> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687526
now that I the bug report I must say
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package gnome-menus for an additional fix for #692141.
The sole change to the script would indeed fix new installations but not
existing ones.
gnome-menus (3.4.2-7) unstabl
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 02:20:06PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On top of this I would like to discuss whether it is acceptable to fix
> http://bugs.debian.org/697057 in stable, too. [ I definitily want o
> get the fix into testing - #697444.] The Debian configuration
> optionally allows to use
Your message dated Mon, 07 Jan 2013 11:04:01 +0100
with message-id <50ea9d91.3010...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#697579: unblock: kanatest/0.4.8-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #697579,
regarding unblock: kanatest/0.4.8-2.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Hi,
> Two weeks later, and rougly one month before the freeze? PING? Can you
> (= pkg-java and Sebastien!) please answer?
Now - *8* months later (yes, I let it slip but it was not very likely
to fit the freeze anyway with the non-reaction of the r-dep maintainers) -
we are long inside the freeze
33 matches
Mail list logo
