Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package ircd-hybrid
This fixes the following important bugs:
* Really enable hardened build flags; thanks to Simon Ruderich
(Closes: #657537)
* Fix bug where only
retitle 690877 unblock: love/0.8.0-1+deb7u1 TPU pre-approval
tags 690877 - moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 07:11:10PM +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> On 11-11-12 18:40, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >> The new package fixes several RC and RG bugs. Compared to the previous
> >> unblock
> >> requ
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 690877 unblock: love/0.8.0-1+deb7u1 TPU pre-approval
Bug #690877 [release.debian.org] unblock: love/0.8.0-3
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: love/0.8.0-1+deb7u1 TPU pre-approval' from
'unblock: love/0.8.0-3'
> tags 690877 - moreinfo
Bug #69
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 12:18:43PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > diff -ruN 6.0.6-1/debian/hylafax-client.postrm
> > 6.0.6-2~wheezy1/debian/hylafax-client.postrm
> > --- 6.0.6-1/debian/hylafax-client.postrm2010-06-20
> > 00:29:50.0 +0200
> > +++ 6.0.6-2~wheezy1/debian/hylaf
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
This is a pre-upload approval for transition of x2goclient src:package
3.99.2.1-2 to wheezy. The package has not been uploaded, yet.
The upload closes two RC bugs (grave) and closes two oth
On 21/12/12 12:33, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On 2012-12-21 12:04, Toni Mueller wrote:
>>> In practice, isn't taxbird dead and therefore unlikely to change at
>>> all in the future? I think if we include it in wheezy, we should
>>> include the newest packaged version.
>>
>> Yes. The author works
Adam D. Barratt (22/12/2012):
> Please go ahead; thanks.
Uploaded, thanks.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Sat, 22 Dec 2012 20:36:54 +0100
with message-id <20121222193654.ga17...@spike.0x539.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#696546: unblock: openexr/1.6.1-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #696546,
regarding unblock: openexr/1.6.1-7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
On 10.12.2012 16:06, Martin Pitt wrote:
As usual, they are on
http://people.debian.org/~mpitt/psql/squeeze/
together with a full debdiff.
fwiw, at the time of writing there doesn't appear to be a debdiff
there. I generated one myself for the purposes of review.
The package pass the upst
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package openexr, converting the package to multiarch.
thanks, cu andreas
unblock openexr/1.6.1-7
[The following lists of changes regard files as different if they have
diffe
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 20:47:13 +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> > Looks good but (there is always a but :),
> Thanks for the review.
> I added it to nut-client as well (new debdiffs attached).
Thanks, uploaded with this debdiff (to DELAYED/1 in case the
maintainer or the RT want to take a last look).
On 22.12.2012 13:33, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
unblock apt-setup/1:0.77
unblock-udeb apt-setup/1:0.77
unblock espeakup/1:0.71-12
unblock-udeb espeakup/1:0.71-12
[...]
unblock cdebconf/0.180
unblock-udeb cdebconf/0.180
[...]
unblock live-installer/38
unblock-udeb live-installer/38
[...]
unbloc
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 684437
Bug #684437 [release.debian.org] unblock: fpc/2.6.0-6
Marked Bug as done
> # 2.6.0-6 correctly handled, and 2.6.0-7 request superseded by #696540
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
684437
Your message dated Sat, 22 Dec 2012 14:40:40 +0100
with message-id <20121222134040.gb14...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#696454: unblock: espeakup/1:0.71-12
has caused the Debian Bug report #696454,
regarding unblock: espeakup/1:0.71-12
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Cyril Brulebois (20/12/2012):
> time for another round of unblocks/unblock-udebs! Here's a first list,
> basically things I thought I could review way past bedtime. Some more
> packages need review, at least according to the testing summary page:
> http://d-i.debian.org/testing-summary.html
>
>
Your message dated Sat, 22 Dec 2012 12:34:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#696449: unblock: policykit-1/0.105-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #696449,
regarding unblock: policykit-1/0.105-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #696498 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org: unblock: ykclient/2.8-2
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
696498: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696498
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On 21.12.2012 18:57, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
Please unblock ykclient 2.8-2. Debdiff attached.
+ykclient (2.8-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Fix FTBFS on signed-char architectures. Thanks to Jakub Wilk for
the
+patch. Closes: #694804.
Does that issue apply
Your message dated Sat, 22 Dec 2012 11:56:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#695592: unblock: debconf/1.5.48
has caused the Debian Bug report #695592,
regarding unblock: debconf/1.5.48
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package pyxdg for a dependency update. This will avoid
installing menu-xdg on GNOME systems which don’t use it at all anymore.
pyxdg (0.19-5) unstable; urgency=low
* Tea
On 22.12.2012 00:43, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
assuming +squeezeN is still customary for squeeze, here's a source
debdiff. That is really:
Makefile |2 +-
debian/changelog | 10 ++
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
but the list is updated during the source pack
21 matches
Mail list logo
