I haven't uploaded it yet (wanted to ask first), but the debdiff is
below. Please let me know if I should proceed with an upload, or make
changes -- #674181 is minor (doc change); #676424 is serious.
Thanks
diff -Nru emacsen-common-2.0.3/debian/changelog
emacsen-common-2.0.4/debian/changelog
-
Your message dated Sun, 02 Dec 2012 22:13:25 +
with message-id <1354486405.15448.2.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#694559: unblock (RFS): apt-build/0.12.44
has caused the Debian Bug report #694559,
regarding unblock (RFS): apt-build/0.12.44
to be marked as done.
Ok, thanks, Michael, for the hint! #694975
Cheers,
Anton
2012/12/2 Michael Gilbert :
> Please submit a release.debian.org bug report to better track your request.
>
> Best wishes,
> Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
On 2012-12-02 21:37, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>> The package in wheezy contains incorrect (outdated) information w.r.t.
>> to support for legacy hardware (as it was written before AMD released
>> the beta driver) and is therefore misleading the users on upgrades.
>>
>> There are also some (partial) u
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear release-team,
please, consider a granting a wheezy-ignore tag for bugs
#617613 (freecad) and #618968 (netgen).
Both bugs are license issues, which are, seems to be "fixed",
but not in Wheezy. It is i
On Sat, 1 Dec 2012 12:13:06 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 21:50:17 +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>
> > Control: retitle -1 unblock: nut/2.6.4-2.1
> >
> > Upon request of Arnaud Quette, I have uploaded a NMU of nut
> > versioned 2.6.4-2.1, which fixes RC bug #677054. Th
> The package in wheezy contains incorrect (outdated) information w.r.t.
> to support for legacy hardware (as it was written before AMD released
> the beta driver) and is therefore misleading the users on upgrades.
>
> There are also some (partial) upgrade issues with the 32-bit stuff on amd64
Cou
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Tobias Hansen wrote:
> Can this bug be tagged wheezy-ignore? From the bug report:
Please submit a release.debian.org bug report to better track this request.
Thanks,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "uns
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Anton Gladky wrote:
> Dear release-team,
>
> please, consider a granting a wheezy-ignore tag for bugs
> #617613 (freecad) and #618968 (netgen).
>
> Both bugs are license issues, which are, seems to be "fixed",
> but not in Wheezy. It is impossible to make a new uploa
Please feel free to ignore this, but there were a few bugfixes in
lockfile-progs 0.1.17 (just uploaded to sid) that I thought might make
it appropriate for consideration for wheezy:
1) No longer (unintentionally) includes .git* in the source package.
2) Fixes cross-build problem. (Closes: #6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello Julien,
Thank you for your answer. Does it mean I should prepare a new version
with the following changes :
Le 25/11/2012 20:17, Julien Cristau a écrit :
>> + * Revert the use dh_installdocs --link-doc (Closes: #687875,
>> #687881, +#687
Package: bcrypt
Version: 1.1-8
Previously a request was submitted to have bcrypt removed from testing
(#694093). Work has since been completed by DD Michael Stapelberg to
address the two RC bugs that were the motivation behind removal. I would
therefore request that the bcrypt package be included
Your message dated Sun, 2 Dec 2012 15:25:58 +0100
with message-id <20121202142558.gf5...@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#680076: unblock: fonts-sil-padauk/2.80-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #680076,
regarding unblock: fonts-sil-padauk/2.80-1
to be marked as done.
This mea
Your message dated Sun, 2 Dec 2012 15:11:10 +0100
with message-id <20121202141110.go5...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#694935: unblock: openbox/3.5.0-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #694935,
regarding unblock: openbox/3.5.0-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Hi,
please unblock openbox. The version in unstable contains a minor change fixing
an RC bug which causes installations/upgrades to fail (#694396).
unblock: openbox/3.5.0-6
Kind
Dear release-team,
please, consider a granting a wheezy-ignore tag for bugs
#617613 (freecad) and #618968 (netgen).
Both bugs are license issues, which are, seems to be "fixed",
but not in Wheezy. It is impossible to make a new uploads now
to correctly close those bugs.
Thanks,
Anton
--
To U
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 21:55:25 +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> diff -Nru aephea-10.008/debian/control aephea-10.008/debian/control
> --- aephea-10.008/debian/control2011-04-27 07:40:21.0 +0200
> +++ aephea-10.008/debian/control2012-11-26 10:12:59.0 +0100
> @@
Your message dated Sun, 2 Dec 2012 13:10:40 +0100
with message-id <20121202121040.gm5...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#690458: RM: blcr/0.8.2-15 testing
has caused the Debian Bug report #690458,
regarding RM: blcr/0.8.2-15 testing
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sun, 2 Dec 2012 12:54:46 +0100
with message-id <20121202115446.gl5...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#694656: unblock: update-notifier/0.99.3debian11
has caused the Debian Bug report #694656,
regarding unblock: update-notifier/0.99.3debian11
to be marked as done.
Thi
Your message dated Sun, 2 Dec 2012 12:53:05 +0100
with message-id <20121202115305.gk5...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#694327: unblock: javamorph/0.0.20100201-1.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #694327,
regarding unblock: javamorph/0.0.20100201-1.2
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Sun, 2 Dec 2012 12:52:29 +0100
with message-id <20121202115229.gj5...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#691639: unblock: lxde-metapackages/4
has caused the Debian Bug report #691639,
regarding unblock: lxde-metapackages/4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 10:43:35 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On 01/12/12 11:40, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:02:00 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> >> unanimous feedback from users and the Games Team was that they
> >> would prefer an "are you sure?" prompt when auto-downl
On 01/12/12 11:40, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:02:00 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> unanimous feedback from users and the Games Team was that they
>> would prefer an "are you sure?" prompt when auto-downloading was
>> enabled.
>
> Is the rest of the user interface generally
Your message dated Sun, 2 Dec 2012 11:32:32 +0100
with message-id <20121202103232.gg5...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#694859: t-p-u pre-approval fossil/1.22.1+dfsg-0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #694859,
regarding t-p-u pre-approval fossil/1.22.1+dfsg-0.1
to be marked as done.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:46:33 +, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Hello release team,
>
> please unblock package ettercap.
>
> A new upstream version 0.7.5 of ettercap (a ne
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 21:29:30 +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
>
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: unblock
>>
>>
>> This is a relatively big debdiff, but most of the noise
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: jmilli...@gmail.com
Please unblock package haskell-dbus
The version currently in testing, 0.10, has two bugs which can cause problems
for users who run processes with lifetime
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 07:30:16 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> +cairo-dock (3.0.0-3) unstable; urgency=low
> +
> + * Add dpkg-dev (>= 1.16.1~) to Build-Depends.
> + * Enable hardening.
I'd prefer if the above items were left out.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signatur
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 23:04:07 -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> >
> >+if [ "$1" = "triggered" ]; then
> >+if [ -x "/etc/init.d/dovecot" ]; then
> >+if [ -x /usr/sbin/invoke-rc.d ]; then
> >+invoke-rc.d dovecot start
> >+else
> >+/etc/init.d/dovecot star
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 09:31:26 +, Alan Woodland wrote:
> On 7 November 2012 11:15, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Hi Alan,
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 17:56:32 +0100, Alan Woodland wrote:
> >
> >> There's a bug outstanding for dropping the Recommends to Suggests on
> >> the kernel module, th
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package im-config
Applications started by dbus do not get proper keyboard input for CJK
locales as reported in http://bugs.debian.org/694446. The proper
functioning input ca
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 08:01:25PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 19:31:40 +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> > Can I do the upload to t-p-u (via a sponsor)?
> >
> Go ahead.
Uploaded.
Cheers,
Ivo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
32 matches
Mail list logo
