hi,
At Thu, 08 Nov 2012 21:31:18 +0900,
KURASHIKI Satoru wrote:
> Subject: Bug#692740: unblock: hyperestraier/1.4.13-8
I'm sorry forgetting to add the keyword, this bug is intended as
"pre approval" request (so package itself still don't be uploaded).
# I fixed BTS title.
regards,
--
KURASHIKI
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 00:09:52 +0100 intrigeri wrote:
[...]
> Hi,
Hi!
Thanks for your very fast reply.
>
> Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote (10 Nov 2012 22:37:17 GMT) :
> > unblock apt-listbugs/0.1.9
>
> The request does not help me understand how the proposed update is
> supposed to meet the c
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 692928 + moreinfo
Bug #692928 [release.debian.org] unblock: apt-listbugs/0.1.9
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
692928: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=6
tags 692928 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote (10 Nov 2012 22:37:17 GMT) :
> unblock apt-listbugs/0.1.9
The request does not help me understand how the proposed update is
supposed to meet the current guidelines for freeze exceptions [1].
Please clarify.
[1] http://releas
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package apt-listbugs
As can be seen with the following command on the public git repository:
$ git diff apt-listbugs/0.1.8..apt-listbugs/0.1.9 | filterdiff \
--exc
* Adam D. Barratt [121110 21:02]:
> Thanks. In that case, please go ahead.
Done, zsnes_1.510+bz2-5 is now in unstable.
Thanks!
--
Etienne Millon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hello release team,
please unblock package capi4hylafax.
The updated capi4hylafax 1:01.03.00.99.svn.300-18 fixes two RC bugs about
the same issue:
* Only suggest package isdnactivecards
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package wicd. Latest upload in sid fixes RC bug #692916.
Attaching diff to -3 (which was already unblocked recently).
I moved the code adding users from debconf's .config to
On 11/10/2012 12:23 PM, intrigeri wrote:
> Michael Shuler wrote (10 Nov 2012 17:52:41 GMT) :
>> unblock ca-certificates/20121105
>
> There are multiple instances of:
>
>> -CKA_TRUST_SERVER_AUTH CK_TRUST CKT_NSS_TRUST_UNKNOWN
>> +CKA_TRUST_SERVER_AUTH CK_TRUST CKT_NSS_MUST_VERIFY_TRUST
>
> I gues
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 692911 + moreinfo
Bug #692911 [release.debian.org] unblock: ca-certificates/20121105
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
692911: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi
tags 692911 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
Michael Shuler wrote (10 Nov 2012 17:52:41 GMT) :
> unblock ca-certificates/20121105
There are multiple instances of:
> -CKA_TRUST_SERVER_AUTH CK_TRUST CKT_NSS_TRUST_UNKNOWN
> +CKA_TRUST_SERVER_AUTH CK_TRUST CKT_NSS_MUST_VERIFY_TRUST
I guess that was imported
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #692652 [release.debian.org] unblock: xcache/2.0.0-3
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
692652: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692652
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On Sat, 2012-11-10 at 18:49 +0100, Michal Čihař wrote:
> Dne Sat, 10 Nov 2012 17:42:59 +
> "Adam D. Barratt" napsal(a):
> > On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 09:52 +0100, Michal Čihař wrote:
> > > Please unblock (just uploaded) package xcache
> > >
> > > The upload fixes bug
Hi
Dne Sat, 10 Nov 2012 17:42:59 +
"Adam D. Barratt" napsal(a):
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 09:52 +0100, Michal Čihař wrote:
> > Please unblock (just uploaded) package xcache
> >
> > The upload fixes bug #690409 (wrong handling of conffile move), diff of
> > pac
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Please unblock package ca-certificates
ca-certificates/20121105 has been uploaded to unstable and includes two
important fixes for Wheezy:
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #692652 [release.debian.org] unblock: xcache/2.0.0-3
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
692652: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692652
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 09:52 +0100, Michal Čihař wrote:
> Please unblock (just uploaded) package xcache
>
> The upload fixes bug #690409 (wrong handling of conffile move), diff of
> packages is attached.
I might be missing something, but why was the file moved in
to /e
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed d-i
Bug #692767 [release.debian.org] unblock: cryptsetup/2:1.4.3-4
Added tag(s) d-i and confirmed.
--
692767: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692767
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To
Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i
On Sat, 2012-11-10 at 18:01 +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> Jonas Meurer wrote (08 Nov 2012 16:31:14 GMT) :
> > Only easy fixes, documentation and translation updates are included.
>
> I have reviewed the diff, and I agree the few proposed changes are
> easy ones, don't
Your message dated Sat, 10 Nov 2012 17:03:05 +
with message-id <1352566985.4531.16.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#692128: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#692128: unblock:
fonts-liberation/1.07.2-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #692128,
regarding unblock: fonts-liberati
Hi,
Jonas Meurer wrote (08 Nov 2012 16:31:14 GMT) :
> Only easy fixes, documentation and translation updates are included.
I have reviewed the diff, and I agree the few proposed changes are
easy ones, don't look risky to me, and fix annoying bugs. Thanks.
Minor comments follow.
> diff -Nru cryp
Your message dated Sat, 10 Nov 2012 17:58:56 +0100
with message-id <509e87d0.5010...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#692873: unblock: epydoc/3.0.1-13
has caused the Debian Bug report #692873,
regarding unblock: epydoc/3.0.1-13
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sat, 10 Nov 2012 16:57:32 +
with message-id <1352566652.4531.15.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#692790: unblock: icedtea-web/1.3.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #692790,
regarding unblock: icedtea-web/1.3.1-1
to be marked as done.
This mea
Your message dated Sat, 10 Nov 2012 18:00:54 +0100
with message-id <509e8846.50...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#690464:
has caused the Debian Bug report #690464,
regarding unblock: dput/0.9.6.3+nmu1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Control: tags 692733 + fixed pending
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 11:37:46PM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
> Le 09/11/2012 22:31, Kenneth Pronovici a écrit :
>
> > Please unblock package epydoc. The only change is to remove one
> > outdated file is under the non-free CC-BY-NC-SA license. This closes
>
Hi,
Dominique Dumont wrote (05 Nov 2012 12:43:49 GMT) :
> unblock libconfig-model-approx-perl/1.005-1
This includes a big amount of boilerplate / format / ordering changes.
To review the proposed update, one has to ensure each of these
non-minimal changes does not cause any functional change.
I
Hi,
alberto fuentes wrote (20 Oct 2012 13:51:22 GMT) :
> The nmu is already in unstable
... and according to interdiff,
the "d" output matches what Alberto initially proposed,
and about which Julien wrote:
> Looks ok to me.
=> adding the hint looks like the way to go:
unblock dput/0.9.6.3+nmu1
Adam D. Barratt wrote (04 Aug 2012 09:56:26 GMT) :
> For the record: the new package is therefore currently in NEW.
Still true.
Kees Cook wrote:
> I'd like to have this 1.0.0 version in Debian for easier development
> work for people wanting to use libseccomp going forward.
I am not sure I exact
Hi,
> unblock fonts-liberation/1.07.2-6
Looks good, since the ttf-liberation transitional package ships
compatibility symlinks.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 689706 + moreinfo
Bug #689706 [release.debian.org] unblock: gpa/0.9.3-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
689706: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689706
D
tags 689706 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
Daniel Leidert wrote (05 Oct 2012 10:50:17 GMT) :
> So what is your opinion? Can we agree on uploading gpa 0.9.3 to
> unstable and unblocking this version or do you reject this request?
> If you agree, I would upload and then downgrade severity of #634930.
How h
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 690075 + moreinfo
Bug #690075 [release.debian.org] unblock: dnsmasq/2.63-4
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
690075: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=69007
tags 690075 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi Moritz,
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote (09 Oct 2012 17:51:26 GMT) :
> Please unblock package dnsmasq
> It fixes CVE-2012-3411
> unblock dnsmasq/2.63-4
The new upstream version includes quite a few changes that are
unrelated to the security fix, which probably partly ex
On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 15:12:56 +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> The upstream ticket corresponding to this issue is
> https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=74252
>
> It seems to me the actual issue that patch fixes only may impact the
> test suite of other modules that check for unexpected warning
Hi,
(disclaimer: I'm not a member of the release team.)
Hideki Yamane wrote (16 Oct 2012 20:03:34 GMT) :
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 23:45:14 +0100
> "Adam D. Barratt" wrote:
>> > +To enable Tomoyo as the MAC security, please specify parameter to
>> > the kernel.
>> > +By default, it will be done by p
Your message dated Sat, 10 Nov 2012 14:34:26 +
with message-id <1352558066.4531.14.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#691098: unblock: mumble/1.2.3-349-g315b5f5-2.1
[pre-approval request]
has caused the Debian Bug report #691098,
regarding unblock: mumble/1.2.3-349-
Hi Anton,
Anton Gladky wrote (21 Sep 2012 19:57:04 GMT) :
> Dear release team,
(Disclaimer: I'm not part of the release team.)
> the license problem of GMSH is resolved [1], the upstream
> kindly agreed to add a license exception.
> Please, consider adding this package (version 2.6.1.dfsg-4 in
Hi,
Adam D. Barratt wrote (13 Oct 2012 15:06:42 GMT) :
>> Old file-mmagic uses deprecated perl syntax, so I want to unblock it.
>> The follwing is diff (really small changes):
>> http://cvs.namazu.org/Subversion/MMagic/trunk/MMagic.pm?r1=286&r2=279
(That's the diff from "somewhere in between 1.27
Hi Joachim,
Le 06/11/2012 15:06, Joachim Wiedorn a écrit :
> I care about the package chrony: There is a new upstream version in
> unstable which didn't go into testing before freeze. But for some
> days there is a RC bug which should be solved.
>
> How is the right way to update the testing vers
Hi,
Jérémy Bobbio wrote (19 Oct 2012 12:45:44 GMT) :
> Please unblock package torbutton. See #690658: the version currently
> in Wheezy will simply make Iceweasel crash since the later has been
> updated.
This should not be needed for the stable lifetime of Wheezy, once
#690729 is fixed (icewease
Hi,
Philippe Le Brouster wrote (31 Oct 2012 10:06:04 GMT) :
> Le lundi 29 octobre 2012 à 19:04 +, Adam D. Barratt a écrit:
>> As you mentioned above, testing currently has 0.3.10. The relevant
>> diff is thus 0.3.10 to 0.3.12, not from 0.3.11.
> Here are the information from 0.3.10 to 0.3.12
Hi,
Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote (10 Nov 2012 11:15:16 GMT) :
> I have uploaded corrected files (including unified diff,
> old->new) to the same location as before:
> http://rkward.sourceforge.net/debian/0.5.7-3/
FWIW, the new changes_0.5.7_2_3.diff looks good to me.
(Disclaimer: I'm not part o
Hello release team,
hello John,
I care about the package chrony: There is a new upstream version in
unstable which didn't go into testing before freeze. But for some
days there is a RC bug which should be solved.
How is the right way to update the testing version? I could create
an update of this
Hi!
On Saturday 10 November 2012, intrigeri wrote:
> > Files: rkward/qwinhost.cpp.orig rkward/qwinhost.cpp
> > rkward/qwinhost.h.orig rkward/qwinhost.h
>
> These paths don't look correct to me.
> I suggest s,rkward/,rkward/qwinhost/,
Good catch, thanks! I have uploaded corrected files (including
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 08:24:51PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 12:53:08PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 12:39:28AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > > Please unblock package schroot
> > >
> > > I have uploaded schroot 1.6.4-1 to unstable. This contains
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote (10 Nov 2012 09:25:29 GMT) :
> For your convenience, I have also prepared a recursive diff between
> the unpacked and patched source trees of 0.5.7-2 and 0.5.7-3 ([5]).
That may be only me nitpicking, but from my humble reviewer
point-of-view:
- a unifie
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: tpu
A bug report[1] concerning omissions in debian/copyright was filed against the
version of rkward in testing (0.5.7-2). Meanwhile, due to somewhat imperfect
communication, I have already upload
Your message dated Sat, 10 Nov 2012 07:54:30 +
with message-id <1352534070.4531.12.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#687492: unblock: aptitude/0.6.8.2-1 (pre-approve)
has caused the Debian Bug report #687492,
regarding unblock: aptitude/0.6.8.2-1 (pre-approve)
to be
48 matches
Mail list logo
