Craig Small wrote:
> Tell me how to do it (not the API change, but more around the what
> version etc) and I will.
>
> I assume its making a 3.3.4-2 with a debian patch to reverse the API
> and then do.. something.
I think the steps are:
1. prepare 3.3.4-2 backing out the ABI change,
ask ft
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 05:37:37PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> I think including libprocps1 in wheezy would be good, but would it be
> possible to back out the ABI break in sid in the meantime?
Tell me how to do it (not the API change, but more around the what
version etc) and I will.
I assume
On Thu, 01 Nov 2012, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 09:14:48PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > References: bugs #690285 and #690286
> >
> > The versions of both intel-microcode and amd64-microcode currently in Wheezy
> > can trigger a nasty bug in initramfs-tools that
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 692074 + moreinfo
Bug #692074 [release.debian.org] unblock: procps/1:3.3.5-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
692074: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cg
Craig Small wrote:
> Please unblock package procps
If I understand correctly this involves a small transition:
$ cupt rdepends libprocps0
Reverse-Depends: libprocps0-dev 1:3.3.4-1: libprocps0 (= 1:3.3.4-1)
Reverse-Depends: open-vm-tools 2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-1+nmu1: libprocps0
(>= 1:3.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 691065 unblock: network-manager-openconnect/0.9.4.0-8
Bug #691065 [release.debian.org] unblock (pre-approval):
network-manager-openconnect/0.9.4.0-8
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: network-manager-openconnect/0.9.4.0-8' from
'unblock (pre
retitle 691065 unblock: network-manager-openconnect/0.9.4.0-8
thanks
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 05:38:47PM -0400, Mike Miller wrote:
> Dear Release Team,
>
> I would like to upload a new network-manager-openconnect that fixes an
> RC bug (#687557 and duplicates). Without this fix the gnome-shell win
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package procps
procps 3.3.5-1 is blocked because libproc1 is new. The problem is that
the oldest libproc0 will not work with 3.3.5-1 because the API changed.
This means curr
[please CC me on replies]
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 10:25:23PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Please remove hybserv. It hasn't seen a maintainer upload since
> 2006, the package is virtually unused in popcon and it lacks IPv6
> support (#629262)
Hello,
I use hybserv in squeeze and would like
Your message dated Thu, 01 Nov 2012 21:55:47 +
with message-id <1351806947.13272.13.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#691908: unblock: cyrus-sasl2/2.1.25.dfsg1-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #691908,
regarding unblock: cyrus-sasl2/2.1.25.dfsg1-6
to be marked as
Your message dated Thu, 01 Nov 2012 22:03:01 +0100
with message-id <5092e385.3000...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#692068: unblock: elinks/0.12~pre5-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #692068,
regarding unblock: elinks/0.12~pre5-9
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Thu, 01 Nov 2012 20:58:21 +
with message-id <1351803501.13272.11.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#691910: unblock: php5/5.4.4-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #691910,
regarding unblock: php5/5.4.4-9
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package elinks. It fixes CVE-2012-4545.
debdiff attached.
unblock elinks/0.12~pre5-9
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy:
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
> Apologies if I missed it, but why was use_system_crypt_fixes.patch
> disabled?
You're right, it misses the explanation.
Because the test which was patched in use_system_crypt_fixes.patch
is correct again after extended DES was fixed. The
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #691910 [release.debian.org] unblock: php5/5.4.4-9
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
691910: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691910
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 10:34 +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> - one security related bug (extended DES not detected when salt
>didn't have lenght == 9)
> - one security RC bug (PHP files exposed due typoed IfModule
>directive in apache2filter SAPI)
> - fixes libphp
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 15:27 +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote:
> On 31 October 2012 14:44, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 17:45 +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote:
> >> The last serious change required for aptitude + multi-arch is to
> >> improve the command line
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #687492 [release.debian.org] unblock: aptitude/0.6.8.2-1 (pre-approve)
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
687492: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687492
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To
On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 23:58 +0100, Jerome Benoit wrote:
> please pre-approve the unblock of libpam-ssh/1.92-15
>
> in view to encourage potential sponsor to upload it for reintroduction.
>
> libpam-ssh was removed because some easy to fix RC bugs persisted due
> to its unofficial orphan state.
>
On Nov 1, 2012 3:00 PM, "Chuan-kai Lin" wrote:
>
> I am planning to downgrade bison in unstable by uploading an older
> bison package with a higher epoch number. This approach seems to be
> the path of least resistance, unless the release team wants to get
> involved.
>
> Felipe, is it really nec
I am planning to downgrade bison in unstable by uploading an older
bison package with a higher epoch number. This approach seems to be
the path of least resistance, unless the release team wants to get
involved.
Felipe, is it really necessary to downgrade the unstable version all
the way back to
Your message dated Thu, 01 Nov 2012 17:01:44 +0100
with message-id <50929ce8.3050...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#692046: unblock: debdelta/0.50+1
has caused the Debian Bug report #692046,
regarding unblock: debdelta/0.50+1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package debdelta.
It corrects a nasty bug that occours with many KDE packages: those
contain a broken symlink, and 'debdelta-upgrade' would consider them
damaged, and not upd
Your message dated Thu, 01 Nov 2012 16:41:14 +0100
with message-id <5092981a.60...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#692036: unlock apt/0.9.7.6
has caused the Debian Bug report #692036,
regarding unlock apt/0.9.7.6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Hi all,
as mentioned in #691160, in some cases APT fails to provide a clean
upgrade path from python-pyatspi to python-pyatspi2.
Since both packages are binary-compatible, the python-pyatspi2 package
should never have existed in the first place, but it’s a bit late for
that. I think the easiest w
Your message dated Thu, 01 Nov 2012 16:26:15 +0100
with message-id <50929497.8090...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#692037: unblock: gsettings-desktop-schemas/3.4.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #692037,
regarding unblock: gsettings-desktop-schemas/3.4.2-2
to be marked as done.
This me
Your message dated Thu, 01 Nov 2012 16:22:35 +0100
with message-id <509293bb.5060...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#692040: unblock: gnome-system-log/3.4.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #692040,
regarding unblock: gnome-system-log/3.4.1-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Thu, 01 Nov 2012 16:25:00 +0100
with message-id <5092944c.3010...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#691523: unblock: meta-gnome3/1:3.4+6
has caused the Debian Bug report #691523,
regarding unblock: meta-gnome3/1:3.4+6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Thu, 01 Nov 2012 16:20:35 +0100
with message-id <50929343.9000...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#692038: unblock: gnome-menus/3.4.2-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #692038,
regarding unblock: gnome-menus/3.4.2-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
please unblock gnome-system-log for a translation update.
gnome-system-log (3.4.1-3) unstable; urgency=low
[ Michael Biebl ]
* Mark the strings in debian/org.debian.pkexec.gnome-s
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 691523 unblock: meta-gnome3/1:3.4+6
Bug #691523 [release.debian.org] unblock: meta-gnome3/1:3.4+5
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: meta-gnome3/1:3.4+6' from 'unblock:
meta-gnome3/1:3.4+5'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact m
retitle 691523 unblock: meta-gnome3/1:3.4+6
thanks
Hi,
Le vendredi 26 octobre 2012 à 20:10 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
> Please unblock meta-gnome3 for another round of wheezy-targeted fixes.
I forgot another package so there’s a new upload.
> Added:Removed:
> +
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock gnome-menus for a trivial update.
gnome-menus (3.4.2-4) unstable; urgency=low
* Update blacklist for OpenJDK and Icedtea control panels.
Closes: #679565.
unblock gnom
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 02:35:26AM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Actually, including taxbird in wheezy might not be very useful anyway.
> Its website says: "Taxbird ist tot! ... lang lebe Geierlein". So
> another option to consider is removal.
the typical use case is imho to have such so
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
please unblock gsettings-desktop-schemas for a pair of not-so-cosmetic
fixes.
gsettings-desktop-schemas (3.4.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
[ Jeremy Bicha ]
* debian/gsettings-deskto
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: de...@lists.debian.org
Please unblock package apt
Welcome to another lovely episode of "APT unblock"-request!
Previously on the show we had 0.9.7.5, today is all about 0.9.7.6
Your message dated Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:48:36 +0100
with message-id <50927db4.3060...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#692029: unblock: iso-codes/3.40-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #692029,
regarding unblock: iso-codes/3.40-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Please unblock package iso-codes
The new upload renames to message catalogs from "bn_IN" to "bn" locale,
so that users of that locale are ab
Your message dated Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:09:12 +0100
with message-id <50927478.6050...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#691969: unblock: emacs-goodies-el/35.2+nmu1
has caused the Debian Bug report #691969,
regarding unblock: emacs-goodies-el/35.2+nmu1
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Your message dated Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:00:12 +0100
with message-id <5092725c.3040...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#686526: unblock: lightdm/1.2.2-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #686526,
regarding unblock: lightdm/1.2.2-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
On 2012-11-01 12:56, Vlad Orlov wrote:
> Something's wrong... the PTS page doesn't show any unblock requests for
> this package. Is it possible to repeat it somehow?
>
>
Hi,
The PTS does not show unblock requests (only actual unblocks), because
its data source (Britney) does not know about requ
Something's wrong... the PTS page doesn't show any unblock requests for this
package. Is it possible to repeat it somehow?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debi
Your message dated Thu, 01 Nov 2012 11:45:25 +0100
with message-id <509252c5.6020...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#692015: unblock: kdesudo/3.4.2.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #692015,
regarding unblock: kdesudo/3.4.2.4-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package kdesudo.
The -2 version fixes two l10n bugs: a fix in es.po and the addition of
id.po. I have also re-run debconf-updatepo (which only affects the VCS
state). Changel
Your message dated Thu, 01 Nov 2012 11:10:50 +0100
with message-id <50924aaa.7030...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#691971: unblock: mh-e/8.3-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #691971,
regarding unblock: mh-e/8.3-1.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 09:14:48PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> References: bugs #690285 and #690286
>
> The versions of both intel-microcode and amd64-microcode currently in Wheezy
> can trigger a nasty bug in initramfs-tools that renders the system
> unbootable. The packages in u
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
Please unblock raptor2/2.0.8-2, which adds a Breaks against raptor1
versions without symbol versioning, fixing the important bug#656928:
| raptor_sequence.c:385: (raptor_sequence_get_at) assertion fail
Your message dated Thu, 01 Nov 2012 09:14:02 +0100
with message-id <50922f4a.1080...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#692002: unblock: esmtp/1.2-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #692002,
regarding unblock: esmtp/1.2-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
48 matches
Mail list logo
