Bug#690471: marked as done (unblock: tgmochikit/1.4.2-2.1)

Your message dated Mon, 15 Oct 2012 08:00:21 +0200 with message-id <20121015060021.gm17...@radis.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#690471: unblock: tgmochikit/1.4.2-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #690471, regarding unblock: tgmochikit/1.4.2-2.1 to be marked as done. This means that you c

Bug#690501: marked as done (unblock: loadlin/1.6f-1)

Your message dated Mon, 15 Oct 2012 07:56:00 +0200 with message-id <20121015055600.gl17...@radis.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#690501: unblock: loadlin/1.6f-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #690501, regarding unblock: loadlin/1.6f-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Bug#690502: marked as done (unblock: ruby1.8/1.8.7.358-5)

Your message dated Mon, 15 Oct 2012 05:54:12 +0100 with message-id <1350276852.4156.4.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#690502: unblock: ruby1.8/1.8.7.358-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #690502, regarding unblock: ruby1.8/1.8.7.358-5 to be marked as done. This mean

Bug#689579: unblock: dvi2ps-fontdesc-morisawa5/0.5

Hi Adam, On Sat, 13 Oct 2012 18:26:30 +0100, "Adam D. Barratt" wrote: > Looking through the diff, there's an undocumented bump of the > debhelper compat level from 4 to 6. What's the rationale for that? Hmm, this package is very simple and so I seldom update the package. So I'm afraid the pack

Bug#690502: unblock: ruby1.8/1.8.7.358-5

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package ruby1.8 Version 1.8.7.358-5, just uploaded into unstable, includes a fix for CVE-2012-4381 (Debian bug #689945). Attached you will find a debdiff between the version

Bug#690501: unblock: loadlin/1.6f-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hello, Please unblock package loadlin unblock loadlin/1.6f-1 See the attached debdiff. This is a new "upstream" release (I am upstream), but it only includes two things: - the cppcheck p

Bug#690466: marked as done (unblock: libuuid-perl/0.02-5)

Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 22:27:42 +0100 with message-id <1350250062.4156.3.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#690466: unblock: libuuid-perl/0.02-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #690466, regarding unblock: libuuid-perl/0.02-5 to be marked as done. This mean

Bug#668008: transition/unblock: uw-imap

On söndagen den 14 oktober 2012, you stated the following: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 08:12:19 +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote: > > Unfortunately, Jonas's decision to upload without an SONAME bump broke > > all packages that use libc-client (see bug #682256), due to an extra, > > internal (and in this

Re: Iceweasel/Icedove ESR and Whezzy

On Sun, 14 Oct 2012, David Prévot wrote: > [ Maybe a -backports list would be a better place to discuss this issue > than -release ] > > Hi, > > Le 14/10/2012 03:41, Mike Hommey a écrit : > > > When you have backports in your sources.list, you don't automatically > > get your upgrades from ther

Re: Iceweasel/Icedove ESR and Whezzy

[ Maybe a -backports list would be a better place to discuss this issue than -release ] Hi, Le 14/10/2012 03:41, Mike Hommey a écrit : > When you have backports in your sources.list, you don't automatically > get your upgrades from there. Once you do install one for the first > time, subsequent

Bug#687779: marked as done (unblock: ksh/93u+20120628-1)

Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 20:32:52 +0200 with message-id <20121014183252.gj17...@radis.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#687779: ksh: diff for NMU version 93u+-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #687779, regarding unblock: ksh/93u+20120628-1 to be marked as done. This means that yo

Bug#668008: transition/unblock: uw-imap

On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 08:12:19 +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote: > Unfortunately, Jonas's decision to upload without an SONAME bump broke all > packages that use libc-client (see bug #682256), due to an extra, internal > (and in this case unnecessarily strict) version check that fails. > > The SO

Bug#690464: pre-approval: dput nmu

On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 17:14:08 +0100, Alberto Á. Fuentes wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > Dear release team, > > There is a bug (#561678) causing lot of extra work to security and release > teams and

Bug#690475: release.debian.org: unblock: pear-horde-channel/4

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hello release team, Mathieu Parent uploaded a pear-horde-channel source package to unstable. This builds the pear-horde-channel binary package, which basically consists of just the file /us

Bug#690458: RM: blcr/0.8.2-15 testing

On Sun, 2012-10-14 at 17:56 +0100, Alan Woodland wrote: [...] > The library behaves sanely without the kernel module and dropping just > the -dkms package would be my preferred solution. Most binaries that > use BLCR are built to run in environments where the presence of the > kernel part isn't a g

Bug#690472: marked as done (unblock: wzdftpd/0.8.3-6.2)

Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 18:08:30 +0100 with message-id <36ec702d81b0e3355c8ad69d0ef47...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#690472: unblock: wzdftpd/0.8.3-6.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #690472, regarding unblock: wzdftpd/0.8.3-6.2 to be marked as done. This mea

Bug#690472: unblock: wzdftpd/0.8.3-6.2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package wzdftpd This fixes bug #689906 which made the daemon fail to start after reboot if /run is a tmpfs. diff -u wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/changelog wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/chang

Bug#690468: unblock: libpst/0.6.54-4.1

On 14/10/12 18:53, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Already done earlier today; see #690440. Ha! Someone could have CC'd me on that! ;) Thanks anyway and sorry for the noise! Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort here] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#690458: RM: blcr/0.8.2-15 testing

On 14 October 2012 17:07, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sun, 2012-10-14 at 16:26 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo >> >> On 14.10.2012 16:09, Ben Hutchings wrote: >> > blcr is not usable with kernel version 2.6.39 or later (see bug >> > #638339). It will probably be fixed u

Bug#690468: marked as done (unblock: libpst/0.6.54-4.1)

Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 17:53:49 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#690468: unblock: libpst/0.6.54-4.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #690468, regarding unblock: libpst/0.6.54-4.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If th

Bug#690471: unblock: tgmochikit/1.4.2-2.1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package tgmochikit. This version clarifies the licence status of some files. diff -u tgmochikit-1.4.2/debian/changelog tgmochikit-1.4.2/debian/changelog --- tgmochikit-1.4.2

Bug#690468: unblock: libpst/0.6.54-4.1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package libpst The updated package fixes #687879, the policy violation of missing /usr/share/doc/readpst directory, which was replaced by a symlink. Debdiff output is attach

Bug#689147: unblock: gajim/0.15.1-1

On 10/14/2012 06:18 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: * Yann Leboulanger , 2012-10-14, 18:06: - the src/common/gnupg.py changes are big and don't really look bugfix only. What's the potential for regression there? gnupg.py is an external library that is not yet packaged, FWIW, it _is_ packaged as python-

Re: Fixing the Catalyst development environment in Wheezy

On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 17:14:41 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > >We, Debian Perl Group, would like to fix that, and we have been > >working on it during DebCamp and DebConf accordingly. Sorry for the > >delay since then. > [...] > >So, what we want to get into Wheezy is: > > > >- update libcataly

Bug#690443: marked as done (RM: libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl/0.15-1)

Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 17:20:30 +0100 with message-id <20121014172030.e023481a5d1971c455691...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#690443: RM: libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl/0.15-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #690443, regarding RM: libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl/0.15-1 to be marked

Bug#690446: marked as done (RM: libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl/0.06-1)

Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 17:19:40 +0100 with message-id <20121014171940.4e05e6b9564f435a145a3...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#690446: RM: libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl/0.06-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #690446, regarding RM: libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl/0.06-1 to be ma

Bug#690448: marked as done (RM: libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl/0.10-1)

Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 17:18:41 +0100 with message-id <20121014171841.81027d9e00ed7ce5a0dca...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#690448: RM: libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl/0.10-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #690448, regarding RM: libcatalyst-view-component-subinclu

Bug#689147: unblock: gajim/0.15.1-1

* Yann Leboulanger , 2012-10-14, 18:06: - the src/common/gnupg.py changes are big and don't really look bugfix only. What's the potential for regression there? gnupg.py is an external library that is not yet packaged, FWIW, it _is_ packaged as python-gnupg. -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Bug#690466: unblock: libuuid-perl/0.02-5

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Please unblock package libuuid-perl 0.02-5. This adds Conflicts: doc-base (<< 0.10.3) and closes #652638. Complete debdiff: #v+ diff -Nru

Bug#690464: pre-approval: dput nmu

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Dear release team, There is a bug (#561678) causing lot of extra work to security and release teams and the maintainer has not been very responsive lately. I was wondering uploading a nmu

Re: Fixing the Catalyst development environment in Wheezy

On 28.08.2012 20:07, intrigeri wrote: the Catalyst development environment is seriously broken and currently in Debian current testing/sid (to get and idea, see #683656, #680819, #680829, #680826, #665222). We, Debian Perl Group, would like to fix that, and we have been working on it during Deb

Bug#690458: RM: blcr/0.8.2-15 testing

On Sun, 2012-10-14 at 16:26 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > On 14.10.2012 16:09, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > blcr is not usable with kernel version 2.6.39 or later (see bug > > #638339). It will probably be fixed upstream at some point, but > > it cannot now be releas

Bug#689147: unblock: gajim/0.15.1-1

On 10/12/2012 11:31 AM, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 16:12:55 +0200, Yann Leboulanger wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package gajim A new Gajim release fixes some bugs, and parti

Bug#690461: RM: freecad/0.12.5284-dfsg-7

I am not agreed with that and asked adding wheezy-ignore tag to the bug 617613 [1]. We are not able to add a relicensed opencascade version on this freeze-stage. But in general the problem seems to be resolved and new version will hopefully be packaged after the wheezy-release. Anton [1] http://

Bug#690461: RM: freecad/0.12.5284-dfsg-7

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm freecad contains GPLv2 code and links to OCTPL (non-GPL-compatible) libraries (bug #617613)/ This is supposed to be fixed soon as there is a new version of libopencascade under a BSD licence

Processed: Re: Bug#690458: RM: blcr/0.8.2-15 testing

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #690458 [release.debian.org] RM: blcr/0.8.2-15 testing Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 690458: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690458 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#690458: RM: blcr/0.8.2-15 testing

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On 14.10.2012 16:09, Ben Hutchings wrote: blcr is not usable with kernel version 2.6.39 or later (see bug #638339). It will probably be fixed upstream at some point, but it cannot now be released in wheezy. Therefore please remove from testing only. As mentioned a

Bug#689156: marked as done (unblock: mediawiki/1:1.19.2-2)

Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 16:15:41 +0100 with message-id <1b9f97b0150ff0bcaf2b304389b0e...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#689156: unblock: mediawiki/1:1.19.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #689156, regarding unblock: mediawiki/1:1.19.2-2 to be marked as done. Th

Bug#689157: marked as done (unblock: mediawiki-extensions/2.9)

Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 16:14:30 +0100 with message-id <4885fbf38b5b700a51d07c1c81b70...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#689157: unblock: mediawiki-extensions/2.8 has caused the Debian Bug report #689157, regarding unblock: mediawiki-extensions/2.9 to be marked as d

Bug#690458: RM: blcr/0.8.2-15 testing

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm blcr is not usable with kernel version 2.6.39 or later (see bug #638339). It will probably be fixed upstream at some point, but it cannot now be released in wheezy. Therefore please remove from

Bug#689361: marked as done (unblock: at-spi2-atk/2.5.3-2)

Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 16:03:10 +0100 with message-id <490cce03024190b85d6e541815595...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#689361: unblock: at-spi2-atk/2.5.3-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #689361, regarding unblock: at-spi2-atk/2.5.3-2 to be marked as done. This

Re: Fixing the Catalyst development environment in Wheezy

On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 13:07:25 +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > The diffs supplied originally in August are likely to be too large to > be acceptable as unblocks and I've been wondering about an alternative > solution for Wheezy. Thanks for looking into this; but I'd rather have an opinion from the re

Bug#690457: RM: twidge/1.0.8.1+nmu1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm twidge needs to be migrated to a modified hoauth API but the RC bug #665254 has had no maintainer input since it was opened in March. (Maintainer is also upstream.) Please remove twidge from tes

Bug#690448: RM: libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl/0.10-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm As part of the fixes for the Catalyst development environment and to close RC bug #680843, I feel it is necessary to remove libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl from testing. libcatalyst-

Bug#690447: unblock: libphone-ui/1:0.0.1+git20110825-2.1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock this NMU, uploaded to delayed/2. There is an nmudiff in the bug #690150. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Develope

Re: RC-ness of incomplete copyright files

* Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org) [121014 12:44]: > Quoting Michael Gilbert (mgilb...@debian.org): > > Hi, > > > > Jakub Wilk has been filing a lot of RC bugs on packages with > > incomplete copyright files. Some examples: > > http://bugs.debian.org/690394 > > http://bugs.debian.org/690371

Bug#690446: RM: libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl/0.06-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm As part of the fixes for the Catalyst development environment and to close RC bug #680819, I feel it is necessary to remove libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl from testing. libcatalyst-actionrole-

Bug#690442: marked as done (unblock: cairo-5c/1.8.1)

Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 13:28:57 +0100 with message-id <3487a849f110d468597f7dfbc8653...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#690442: unblock: cairo-5c/1.8.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #690442, regarding unblock: cairo-5c/1.8.1 to be marked as done. This means tha

Bug#690443: RM: libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl/0.15-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm As part of the fixes for the Catalyst development environment and to close RC bug #680829, I feel it is necessary to remove libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl from testing. libcatalystx-simplelogin-p

Bug#690442: unblock: cairo-5c/1.8.1

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock cairo-5c/1.8.1. This upload is no rocket science at all, just removing all the past release files from the package. It would help, if the package would be packaged an an upstream package, usi

Bug#690440: marked as done (unblock: libpst 0.6.54-4.1)

Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 13:07:59 +0100 with message-id <102ebeee0ec4f989dfadc729dfdf3...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#690440: unblock: libpst 0.6.54-4.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #690440, regarding unblock: libpst 0.6.54-4.1 to be marked as done. This mea

Re: Fixing the Catalyst development environment in Wheezy

On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 21:07:24 +0200 intrigeri wrote: > the Catalyst development environment is seriously broken and currently > in Debian current testing/sid (to get and idea, see #683656, #680819, > #680829, #680826, #665222). Agreed. > We, Debian Perl Group, would like to fix that, and we hav

Bug#690423: unblock: dropbear/2012.55-1.2

On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 01:17:33PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 13:02:12 +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 12:44:12PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > > Please unblock package dropbear. Uploads 2012.55-1.1 and -1.2 fixed > > > > #630581 which preven

Bug#690440: unblock: libpst 0.6.54-4.1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi, Please unblock libpst; the NMU from Gregor is pending upload for PowerPC and then it will be eligible. His NMU diff is attached. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire

Bug#685597: marked as done (unblock: ppl/0.11.2-8)

Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 12:19:18 +0100 with message-id <61813d4ea4746ba53bc743a895350...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#685597: unblock: ppl/0.11.2-8 has caused the Debian Bug report #685597, regarding unblock: ppl/0.11.2-8 to be marked as done. This means that yo

Bug#690423: unblock: dropbear/2012.55-1.2

Also, fuck Gerrit's mail bouncing with C/R crap. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#690423: unblock: dropbear/2012.55-1.2

On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 13:02:12 +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 12:44:12PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > Please unblock package dropbear. Uploads 2012.55-1.1 and -1.2 fixed > > > #630581 which prevented the "remote unlock" feature to work correctly > > > on Wheezy. This

Bug#690423: unblock: dropbear/2012.55-1.2

On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 12:44:12PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > Please unblock package dropbear. Uploads 2012.55-1.1 and -1.2 fixed > > #630581 which prevented the "remote unlock" feature to work correctly > > on Wheezy. This initramfs hook allows to easily add the possibility to > > enter the

Bug#683323: unblock: python-apt/0.8.7

2012/9/3 Michael Vogt : > On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 01:24:24PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 02:10:17PM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: >> > ke, 2012-08-08 kello 01:50 +0200, Cyril Brulebois kirjoitti: >> > >> > > Julian Andres Klode (30/07/2012): >> > > > Since the v

Bug#690423: unblock: dropbear/2012.55-1.2

On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 11:44:33 +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > Please unblock package dropbear. Uploads 2012.55-1.1 and -1.2 fixed > #630581 which prevented the "remote unlock" fe

Re: RC-ness of incomplete copyright files

Quoting Michael Gilbert (mgilb...@debian.org): > Hi, > > Jakub Wilk has been filing a lot of RC bugs on packages with > incomplete copyright files. Some examples: > http://bugs.debian.org/690394 > http://bugs.debian.org/690371 > http://bugs.debian.org/690370 > > Now, these are mostly easy fixes

Re: Bug#665476: libsasl2-2 - ABI change without changing ABI name

On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 11:29:21 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: > Please revert, this will only break everything around and we don't > really want transition sasl right now. > Agreed that this patch is not acceptable. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#685960: unblock: gnupg/1.4.12-6

Please unblock gnupg/1.4.12-6 The last upload did not fix #685627 as it did not trigger a rebuild of the .gmo file(s). The upload of gnupg/1.4.12-6 will fix that. Regards, Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont

Re: Bug#687402: beanstalkd: proposed TPU (diff for NMU version 1.4.6-3.1)

On 13.10.2012 23:15, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 09:19:24PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On 13.10.2012 20:22, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: >Dear RMs, here's an almost identical patch (also, dropping -i as >it's also >deprecated, and adding VCS headers). On the whole, this lo

Bug#690419: marked as done (unblock: iceweasel/10.0.9esr-1)

Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 12:12:50 +0200 with message-id <20121014101250.gb17...@radis.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#690419: unblock: iceweasel/10.0.9esr-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #690419, regarding unblock: iceweasel/10.0.9esr-1 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#690424: unblock: node/0.3.2-7.2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package node I've just uploaded an NMU which implements only the changes requested by the TC for the rename to stop the clash with nodejs. Reviewed already by several folks a

Bug#690423: unblock: dropbear/2012.55-1.2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package dropbear. Uploads 2012.55-1.1 and -1.2 fixed #630581 which prevented the "remote unlock" feature to work correctly on Wheezy. This initramfs hook allows to easily add

Bug#681717: unblock: openjpeg/1.3+dfsg-4.4

On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 17:59:37 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: > > Needing to debug the tools is both a lot more unlikely than debugging > > the library or something that uses it, and easy enough to build a debug > > version of the tool (which you need to do anyway to debug). So I don't > > think

Re: Bug#665476: libsasl2-2 - ABI change without changing ABI name

And your patch is wrong, you have bumped soname, but left the package name same, which is even more wrong the this subtle breakage in the first place. On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Ondřej Surý wrote: > Please revert, this will only break everything around and we don't > really want transition

Re: Bug#665476: libsasl2-2 - ABI change without changing ABI name

Please revert, this will only break everything around and we don't really want transition sasl right now. The only thing which broke was openldap due some really deep internal library symbols, which are not used anywhere else, and it's already fixed, so I don't think this deserves transition. Deb

Bug#690419: unblock: iceweasel/10.0.9esr-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package iceweasel 10.0.8esr-1/10.0.9esr-1 only contain upstream changes, which are security updates for the extended support branch. unblock iceweasel/10.0.9esr-1 -- System

Re: Iceweasel/Icedove ESR and Whezzy

On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 02:19:25PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 09:43:48 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > Or maybe it would be a good idea to add the working pinning setup to the > > iceweasel package itself, so that people that add backports source will > > automatically

Bug#688391: marked as done (unblock: caribou/0.4.4-1)

Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 09:27:12 +0200 with message-id <507a6950.1090...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#688391: unblock: caribou/0.4.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #688391, regarding unblock: caribou/0.4.4-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Processed: Re: Bug#689351: unblock: klibc/2.0.1-2

Processing control commands: > tags -1 pending d-i Bug #689351 [release.debian.org] unblock: klibc/2.0.1-2 Added tag(s) d-i and pending. -- 689351: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689351 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Bug#689351: unblock: klibc/2.0.1-2

Control: tags -1 pending d-i On 2012-10-01 21:54, maximilian attems wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > Please unblock package klibc > > Has 3 fixes for armhf RC bug, plus security fix for dash > and a fix

Processed: Re: Bug#688512: unblock or tpu: glib2.0/2.33.12+really2.32.4-1

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending d-i Bug #688512 [release.debian.org] unblock or tpu: glib2.0/2.33.12+really2.32.4-1 Added tag(s) d-i and pending. -- 688512: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688512 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problem

Bug#688512: unblock or tpu: glib2.0/2.33.12+really2.32.4-1

Control: tag -1 pending d-i On 2012-10-06 02:44, Josselin Mouette wrote: > I have just uploaded version 2.33.12+really2.32.4-2 because of a > security vulnerability: > > glib2.0 (2.33.12+really2.32.4-2) unstable; urgency=medium > > * Revert link adding for gdbus-object-manager-example. While i

Bug#689691: marked as done (unblock: php-letodms-core/3.3.9-1)

Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 09:08:41 +0200 with message-id <507a64f9.1030...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#689691: unblock: php-letodms-core/3.3.9-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #689691, regarding unblock: php-letodms-core/3.3.9-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim