Hi Cyril,
Am Mittwoch, dem 08.08.2012 um 0:35 schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
> Hello Thomas.
>
> Thomas Müller (07/08/2012):
> > The security issues have not been introduced in .5 - they exist since
> > day one. Are suggesting to push the .6 as experimental to have .5 and
> > .6 available?
>
> That
On Wed, August 8, 2012 01:15, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Thijs Kinkhorst (07/08/2012):
>> On Tue, August 7, 2012 01:44, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> > while I have only glanced at it, that doesn't look bad at all,
>> > please go ahead and ping us once it's accepted.
>>
>> It has now been accepted.
>
>
Hello,
Anton Gladky (16/07/2012):
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package paraview_3.14.1-7.
>
> The version fixes bug #680359 and has some minor fixes, including hardening
> build-flags. Diff
Your message dated Wed, 8 Aug 2012 02:32:58 +0200
with message-id <20120808003258.gi31...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#684007: unblock: ukolovnik/1.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #684007,
regarding unblock: ukolovnik/1.4-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Wed, 8 Aug 2012 02:31:01 +0200
with message-id <20120808003101.gh31...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#684141: unblock: boinc/7.0.27+dfsg-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #684141,
regarding unblock: boinc/7.0.27+dfsg-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Hello,
Adam D. Barratt (04/08/2012):
> It'd still really want someone from the team to be happy with the
> changes before unblocking them however.
I think I won't be against having 1.8.4 in unstable, and see what
happens on the bug reports front after an extended period of time (say
20 days).
I
Your message dated Wed, 8 Aug 2012 02:14:58 +0200
with message-id <20120808001458.gf31...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#683736: unblock: iptables/1.4.14-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #683736,
regarding unblock: iptables/1.4.14-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
On 08/08/2012 01:30 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Steffen Moeller (07/08/2012):
>> Please unblock package boinc
>>
>> It is currently not in testing, once removed because of a dependency
>> of a virtual binary package on the unfortunate fglrx drivers.
>
> yeah, I remember removing it a
Thomas Goirand (02/08/2012):
> FYI, I have been working with Luis on phpunit-selenium (I sponsored
> his upload), as well as on many other phpunit packages. I do approve
> the addition of the DMUA flag (which was first introduced in the
> version uploaded to Experimental).
I'm sure you'll both ma
Hello,
Erik Johansson (30/07/2012):
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: freeze-exception
>
> Please unblock package licq
>
> Contains fix for RC bug and correction to release goal. From changelog:
>
> * Add lintian overri
Daniel Baumann (30/07/2012):
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> 3.0.0-3 would have migrated in time, 3.0.0-4 fixes a syntax error in the
> init script.
If you have had the decency to basically test your package,
Josh Triplett (30/07/2012):
> As discussed with Adam Barratt via #debian-release, -2 just adds a
> single patch from upstream to fix bug 662087.
>
> debdiff:
>
> diff -u htop-1.0.1/debian/changelog htop-1.0.1/debian/changelog
> --- htop-1.0.1/debian/changelog
> +++ htop-1.0.1/debian/changelog
>
Hello.
Julian Andres Klode (30/07/2012):
> Since the version of testing, this contains mostly bug fixes and
> many translation updates, but also (starting with 0.8.5) one new
> module (apt.auth) which is a cleaned up version of an internal
> software-properties module (and not used by any code in
Hello,
David Prévot (02/08/2012):
>
> You recently accepted 2.1.1-3squeeze4 for the next point release, that
> fixes some security issues, but a new one has just been disclosed
> (#683667), so here I am again. Upstream confirmed they can't reproduce
> the last security issue with this version.
>
Hello,
Steffen Moeller (07/08/2012):
> Please unblock package boinc
>
> It is currently not in testing, once removed because of a dependency
> of a virtual binary package on the unfortunate fglrx drivers.
yeah, I remember removing it at the time.
> No serious bugs. It is much superior to what
Your message dated Wed, 8 Aug 2012 01:22:08 +0200
with message-id <20120807232208.gh26...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#684112: unblock: samba/2:3.6.6-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #684112,
regarding unblock: samba/2:3.6.6-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Thijs Kinkhorst (07/08/2012):
> On Tue, August 7, 2012 01:44, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > while I have only glanced at it, that doesn't look bad at all,
> > please go ahead and ping us once it's accepted.
>
> It has now been accepted.
Thanks. Now that I have a little more time, finally looking at
Hi,
Andrew Shadura (07/08/2012):
> Please unblock package wmii
>
> unblock wmii/3.9.2+debian-4
>
> Begin forwarded message: […]
thanks for filing a bug.
> There's a nasty bug in wmii, #628575. It's already fixed upstream, and
> it's already packaged by me, but that version is certainly unsuit
Your message dated Wed, 8 Aug 2012 00:54:17 +0200
with message-id <20120807225417.ge26...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#684221: unblock: hexer/0.1.7-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #684221,
regarding unblock: hexer/0.1.7-1.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Niels Thykier (31/07/2012):
> Not sure if you are aware of it, but d-i has requested us to hold all
> udebs for now. So it may be a while before you get a final answer on
> this request.
Hopefully not too much. Feel free to unblock after a review, no
objection (on principle) on the d-i side.
Mr
Hello Thomas.
Thomas Müller (07/08/2012):
> The security issues have not been introduced in .5 - they exist since
> day one. Are suggesting to push the .6 as experimental to have .5 and
> .6 available?
That would be nice, people could then grab it from there and start
toying with it.
> I'm als
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package hexer
It contains a fix for bug #684084; debdiff is attached to that bug.
unblock hexer/0.1.7-1.1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers uns
Your message dated Wed, 8 Aug 2012 00:27:14 +0200
with message-id <20120807222714.gb26...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#684122: unblock: mesa/8.0.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #684122,
regarding unblock: mesa/8.0.4-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Hello,
Tobias Quathamer (07/08/2012):
> Dear release team,
>
> traditionally, the package iso-codes has been granted unblock requests
> with new upstream versions without problems, because it contains only
> data and translations. I'd like to prepare a new upstream release to
> upload to unstabl
Your message dated Tue, 07 Aug 2012 22:21:32 +0100
with message-id <1344374492.11372.1.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#684209: unblock: libmojomojo-perl/1.05+dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #684209,
regarding unblock: libmojomojo-perl/1.05+dfsg-3
to be marked
Your message dated Tue, 07 Aug 2012 22:06:54 +0100
with message-id <1344373614.11372.0.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#684212: unblock: python-networkx/1.7~rc1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #684212,
regarding unblock: python-networkx/1.7~rc1-3
to be marked as don
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package python-networkx
It includes an upstream patch to fix a FTBFS bug in nypype .
unblock python-networkx/1.7~rc1-3
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
A
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libmojomojo-perl
libmojomojo-perl/1.05+dfsg-3 contains a one-line fix picked from
upstream git, removing a workaround for a previous limitation in
Catalyst::Plugins::
On 06/08/12 15:12, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 06.08.2012 14:20, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> Attached is a debdiff of changes made since 0.6.19~dfsg1-2 - the version
>> that would've entered testing had it not been held back by bugs #611698
>> and #681360.
>
> None of the code has ever been in test
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 01:38:00AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
...
> > - New maintainer address. Thanks to Jan Hauke Rahm for his
> > sponsorships.
>
> Congratulations for that.
Thanks.
> > - Standards Version updated to 3.9.3: No changes required.
>
> That's some bits of noise dur
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package wmii
unblock wmii/3.9.2+debian-4
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 21:45:33 +0200
From: Andrew Shadura
To: debian-release@lists.debian.org
Subject: w
tasksel 3.12 also removes the contrib package
opendict-plugins-lingvosoft from the Recommends of task-serbian.
Which was a violation of a policy "must", and so a RC bug.
tasksel is ready to migrate tomorrow if unblocked.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Control: block -1 with 684044
On 07.08.2012 16:04, Marcelo Jorge Vieira wrote:
Please unblock package uglifyjs
We have now adjusted uglifyjs use nodejs (not node) as hashbang, and
consider it ready for inclusion in Wheezy.
This assumes that nodejs will be in wheezy, which is far from certain;
Processing control commands:
> block -1 with 684044
Bug #684181 [release.debian.org] unblock: uglifyjs/1.2.6-3
684181 was not blocked by any bugs.
684181 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 684181: 684044
--
684181: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684181
Debian B
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package uglifyjs
We have now adjusted uglifyjs use nodejs (not node) as hashbang, and
consider it ready for inclusion in Wheezy.
Attached is a debdiff of changes made since
On 2012-07-21 21:41, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> I'd like to ask whether an exception is possible for the following
> change/move of functionality:
>
> The non-free video drivers Nvidia and Fglrx need to blacklist their free
> counterparts Nouveau and Radeon. Currently a conffile is shipped in
> /et
Your message dated Tue, 07 Aug 2012 15:18:17 +0200
with message-id <50211599.1060...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#682092: unblock: skktools/1.3.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #682092,
regarding unblock: skktools/1.3.2-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Tue, 07 Aug 2012 13:50:59 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#684125: unblock: libmath-random-mt-perl/1.15-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #684125,
regarding unblock: libmath-random-mt-perl/1.15-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Your message dated Tue, 07 Aug 2012 13:48:26 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#684140: unblock: libotr/3.2.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #684140,
regarding unblock: libotr/3.2.1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package boinc
It is currently not in testing, once removed because of a dependency of a
virtual binary package on the unfortunate fglrx drivers.
No serious bugs. It is much
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libotr
Fixes security hole (possible buffer overflow in base64 routines): #684121
The only change from 3.2.0-4 (currently in wheezy) and 3.2.1-1 is the security
fix,
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 07:03:16PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Copying debian-release@ and debian-kernel@ on what they think. To provide
> context (it seems that pkg-nvidia-devel@ dropped my mails or put it into a
> queue, hence they're not in a list archive): nvidia-graphics-modules seems to
> be
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear Release-Team
Please unblock package libmath-random-mt-perl
Version 1.15 introduced a bug: rand() does not handle arguments and
irand()
Dear release team,
traditionally, the package iso-codes has been granted unblock requests
with new upstream versions without problems, because it contains only
data and translations. I'd like to prepare a new upstream release to
upload to unstable now.
However, the package has received bug #68382
Your message dated Tue, 7 Aug 2012 10:26:40 +0200
with message-id <20120807082640.gg17...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#683719: release.debian.org: unblock: gnat-4.6/4.6.3-5
to allow gnat-gps to migrate to testing
has caused the Debian Bug report #683719,
regarding release.debian.org
Hi Cyril,
thanks for answer. Let me try to got into more details below.
Am Dienstag, dem 07.08.2012 um 2:08 schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
> Hello,
>
> Thomas Müller (31/07/2012):
> > We have ownCloud 4.0.4 in testing and 4.0.5 (which fixes RC #681138)
> > in unstable. Just a few minutes ago upstrea
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package mesa. 8.0.4 is the latest release from
upstream's stable branch. No regressions reported since its upload a
week ago, ttbomk. There'll probably be at least one more
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Changing the request again (sorry) to include also next patch scheduled
for security update:
php5 (5.4.4-5) unstable; urgency=low
.
* CVE-2012-3450: parsing bug in PDO can lead to access violations
diffstat:
debian/patches/CVE-2012-3450.patch |
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 682192 unblock: php5/5.4.4-4
Bug #682192 [release.debian.org] unblock: php5/5.4.4-5
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: php5/5.4.4-4' from 'unblock: php5/5.4.4-5'
> thank you
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
retitle 682192 unblock: php5/5.4.4-4
thank you
I take this mail back - so this applies to 5.4.4-4. Should not mail
before first coffee :(.
Seems this bug has already been fixed in Debian version (only squeeze
needed to be updated).
O.
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Packag
Your message dated Tue, 7 Aug 2012 09:40:08 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: pu: package php5/5.3.3-7+squeeze14
has caused the Debian Bug report #682984,
regarding pu: package php5/5.3.3-7+squeeze14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 682192 unblock: php5/5.4.4-5
Bug #682192 [release.debian.org] unblock: php5/5.4.4-4
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: php5/5.4.4-5' from 'unblock: php5/5.4.4-4'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package fex
It addresses all currently known issues. It would be great if this could
make it into wheezy still to spare us unneccessary work with supporting
the 20120215-3 on
On Tue, August 7, 2012 01:44, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hello Thijs,
>
> Thijs Kinkhorst (06/08/2012):
>> I would like to upload simplesamlphp/1.9.1-1: an upstream security
>> release that only fixes a security issue and adds some minor
>> documentation fixes. The debdiff is attached.
>
> while I
54 matches
Mail list logo
