Hi
Dne Sat, 7 Jul 2012 10:51:07 +0200
Cyril Brulebois napsal(a):
> Michal Čihař (04/07/2012):
> > Okay, attaching filtered diff without translations.
>
> Thanks, doesn't look too huge or insane, so please go ahead with an
> upload to unstable.
Thanks, uploaded.
> I guess letting it spend 15
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
it would be cool if you could unblock qwbfsmanager/1.2.1-1.1.
1.2.1-1 had an automatic freeze exception but never migrated due to two bugs:
#672048 FTBFS: src/gui/pColorButton.h:35:25:
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 07:54:27PM -0600, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Aurelien,
>
> thanks for informing us.
>
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 12:08:06AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > As a consequence the armhf value will have to be changed in the future,
> > which might have some side effects.
>
>
On 9 July 2012 07:45, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Grepping my d-i directory (contained many d-i related package checkouts)
Thanks for pointing this out, I had not identified d-i packages when
searching for Depends: aptitude. I had assumed that d-i was using
apt-get and it's more predictable interfa
On 9 July 2012 07:45, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> The new version is available on mentors.d.n, we will not upload
>> however unless granted a freeze exception.
>
> Having it uploaded to experimental would be an idea for the time being,
> so that people can (in an opt-in fashion) test it.
I have upd
Your message dated Mon, 09 Jul 2012 04:47:39 +0200
with message-id <4ffa464b.6030...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: nmu: apertium-en-ca_0.8.9-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #680437,
regarding nmu: apertium-en-ca_0.8.9-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 680901 -1
Bug #680901 [release.debian.org] nmu: rpy_1.0.3-21
Bug 680901 cloned as bug 680903
> reassign -1 python-rpy 1.0.3-21
Bug #680903 [release.debian.org] nmu: rpy_1.0.3-21
Bug reassigned from package 'release.debian.org' to 'python-rpy
clone 680901 -1
reassign -1 python-rpy 1.0.3-21
retitle -1 needs tighter dependency on R
thanks
On 2012-07-09 03:16, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
[...]
> RuntimeError: No module named _rpy2151
[...]
> Rebuilding rpy in a clean sid chroot replaces
> usr/lib/python2.?/dist-packages/_rpy2150.so
> with
>
Le dimanche, 8 juillet 2012 17.03:40, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> doesn't look insane to me, but I'd appreciate a tiny briefing on the
> uPr=WCDMA bit: Care to explain why that fixes a bug? (I suspect it makes
> sure some extra properties are checked, instead of just relying on
> vendorid+productid
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu rpy_1.0.3-21 . ALL . -m "rebuild against R 2.15.1"
>>> from rpy import *
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/rpy.py", line
Moritz Muehlenhoff (05/07/2012):
> Please unblock package chrony
>
> The upload adds hardened build flags and chrony is one of the
> packages from the targeted subgroup (had a DSA in the past)
>
> unblock chrony/1.26-2
121 files changed, 5741 insertions(+), 13289 deletions(-)
:(
Ready to dea
Hello,
Nicholas Bamber (03/07/2012):
> I cannot reproduce the crash but there is a patch if someone can. Else
> can this bug be downgraded to important.
>
> I was thinking of raising an NMU but I'm not sure if I feel comfortable
> for just one bug.
>
> And of course I have copied the maintainer
Nicholas Bamber (03/07/2012):
> This is one I raised and people are asking me to upgrade the w3c stuff
> which requires fixing it. It probably just requires a slight
> application of xargs, but the XML world in Debian is pretty dead and
> quite a lot is going on already and XML is not my top focus
Your message dated Mon, 09 Jul 2012 01:19:10 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#679495: unblock: klibc/2.0.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #679495,
regarding unblock: klibc/2.0.1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Chow Loong Jin (05/07/2012):
> Here's a diff between 2.0.4.0-1 (in unstable) and 2.1.0.0-1. I needed
> to get upstream to bump the version as one of the bugfixes had
> introduced an ABI break.
For those getting bored by reading this long diff, this means:
libtaglib2.0-cil → libtaglib2.1-cil
>
Hello,
Daniel Hartwig (02/07/2012):
> The main bugs concerning this are: 121313, 282408, 302784, 434502,
> 576212, 590686, 639789. A quick look at those bugs should indicate
> that aptitude's current behaviour has long been considered quite
> unusable.
thanks for your work on aptitude, it's bee
Rob Browning writes:
> Right, that one I can't explain. So far, only murphy hates the package
> (both revisions). It builds fine on biber, and also here in a wheezy
> i386 chroot.
It looks like one difference between biber and murphy is that the former
is amd64 while the latter is strictly i38
On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 07:00:56PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> > You may want to learn about binary removals:
> > http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals
> I am not sure if any binary package is to be removed.
I think you can safely assume that when you're pointed at it, by us, it's
high
Your message dated Mon, 9 Jul 2012 01:29:18 +0200
with message-id <20120708232918.gg25...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#680895: unblock: libtext-tabulardisplay-perl/1.33-1
(asking for pre-approval, package not uploaded yet)
has caused the Debian Bug report #680895,
regarding unblock: libtext-
Hello,
Am Sonntag, den 08.07.2012, 22:43 +0200 schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
> > unblock tcpreplay/3.4.4-1
>
> Which couldn't work given you already have uploaded another revision…
> Anyway, waiting a week after the freeze to upload a new upstream version
> from 2010 is something that looks a bit unn
Hello Cyril
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 12:56:41AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hello Salvatore,
>
> Salvatore Bonaccorso (09/07/2012):
> > It was reported a FTBFS with libtext-recordparser-perl [1].
> >
> > [1]: http://bugs.debian.org/680831
> >
> > But this actually is a bug in libtext-tabul
Cyril Brulebois writes:
> Apparently emacs24 isn't quite in testing yet, since it got uploaded
> again:
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/e/emacs24/news/20120705T013216Z.html
True, though the only change was to fix builds on non-linux systems. I
added a [linux-any] to the libselinux1-dev build-
Etienne Millon (08/07/2012):
> This upload fixes RC bugs #679526 (Multi-arch support) and #679826
> (segfault of zsnes:i386 on amd64 machines).
I'll just comment on one bit, which means your package can't migrate
anyway.
> + [ Etienne Millon ]
> + * Disable build on amd64 (Closes: #679526)
> +
Hello,
Didier Raboud (06/07/2012):
> This upstream release further specifies the identifier for a specific
> device; in that case, the [19d2:0083] ZTE MF110 Blade phone. by moving
> it's configuration file from 19d2:0083 to 19d2:0083:uPr=WCDMA. This
> avoids switching a wrong device.
>
> u
Hello Salvatore,
Salvatore Bonaccorso (09/07/2012):
> It was reported a FTBFS with libtext-recordparser-perl [1].
>
> [1]: http://bugs.debian.org/680831
>
> But this actually is a bug in libtext-tabulardisplay-perl just
> introduced by an update with 1.31-1. Upstream reference is found
> here[
Cyril Brulebois writes:
> I'm not sure we're going to let any new packages enter testing at this
> point…
No problem. I'm only asking that _if_ emacs24 is released with wheezy
then I'd like to have a freeze exception for magit 1.1.1-3.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.de
Timo Juhani Lindfors (03/07/2012):
> just after freeze I heard that emacs24 got a freeze-exception [1]. I
> maintain magit which is an add-on to emacs. Since magit does not support
> xemacs21 or emacs22 it has to maintain an explicit list of supported
> emacs versions as per debian emacs policy [2
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jul 2012 23:47:59 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#680851: unblock: django-auth-ldap/1.0.19-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #680851,
regarding unblock: django-auth-ldap/1.0.19-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Your message dated Mon, 9 Jul 2012 00:42:31 +0200
with message-id <20120708224231.gb25...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#680889: release.debian.org: unblock:
libio-socket-ip-perl/0.16-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #680889,
regarding release.debian.org: unblock: libio-socket-ip-perl/0.16-2
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Release-Team
It was reported a FTBFS with libtext-recordparser-perl [1].
[1]: http://bugs.debian.org/680831
But this actually
Hi,
Cyril Brulebois wrote (08 Jul 2012 22:29:28 GMT) :
> Surely, waiting one extra day to let 0.51-1 migrate to testing would
> have been appreciated…
I'm sorry if the way I acted creates more work for you.
I was not aware of this.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debia
Your message dated Mon, 9 Jul 2012 00:33:08 +0200
with message-id <20120708223308.ga25...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#680888: release.debian.org: unblock:
libio-async-perl/0.51-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #680888,
regarding release.debian.org: unblock: libio-async-perl/0.51-2
to be m
intrig...@debian.org (08/07/2012):
> please unblock libio-async-perl/0.51-2 to fix #680832.
> debdiff is attached.
>
> 0.51-1 is in unstable only, but it was uploaded before the freeze, so
> it was granted an automatic freeze exception, so I hope amending the
> already-granted freeze exception wi
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package ruby-httpclient
The latest upload fixes RC bug #674308, which affects testing as well as
unstable. Follows attached a debdiff between the version currently in testing
Bastian Blank (08/07/2012):
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package xen. It fixes upgrades between incompatible
> versions by removing /usr/lib/xen-default. Also it fixes an oversight in
> the i
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: Possible freeze exception for autopkgtest"):
> Uh, I asked about two possible uploads. One of which needs me to
> review and test the patch so I only have a provisional diff. The
> provisional diff is the final one in this bug report
> http://bugs.debian.org/678359
Afte
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package alsa-base for the RC bug fix
just uploaded for #673679.
The complicating factor here is the udeb. alsa-drivers
provides the old alsa-base udeb in testing which is now
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Hi!
please unblock libio-socket-ip-perl/0.16-2 to fix #680809.
debdiff is attached.
0.16-1 is in unstable only, but it was uploaded before the freeze,
so it was granted an automat
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Hi!
please unblock libio-async-perl/0.51-2 to fix #680832.
debdiff is attached.
0.51-1 is in unstable only, but it was uploaded before the freeze,
so it was granted an automatic f
Hi,
and thanks for checking with us.
shawn (06/07/2012):
> paulproteus/asheesh wanted me to get an ACK from you on unfreezing
> 1.2.76-4 before he uploads
Feel free to get that uploaded, but unfortunately I fear we won't be
accepting any new packages into testing at this point (especially as 4
Your message dated Sun, 8 Jul 2012 23:29:51 +0200
with message-id <20120708212951.ga21...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#680753: unblock: mythtv-status/0.10.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #680753,
regarding unblock: mythtv-status/0.10.2-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Hi,
Iain Lane (05/07/2012):
> Please ack an unblock of package pinta. I just uploaded it to
> experimental in case you deny this request, so we still have room to
> cherry-pick bug fixes in.
thanks for that.
> 1.3 is an upstream bug fix release that came out quite some time ago,
> but I missed
Hello,
Stephen Kitt (05/07/2012):
> Just to clarify, this is a pre-upload request...
yeah, it looks possible to install all 3 packages + the
conflicted-against package in wheezy without apparent issues.
Please upload to unstable and ping again once that's done.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Desc
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jul 2012 23:44:15 +0200
with message-id <4ff9ff2f.3020...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#680725: unblock: aolserver4-nsxml/1.5-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #680725,
regarding unblock: aolserver4-nsxml/1.5-2.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Hi,
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo (08/07/2012):
> IMO the best things about the game are that it's relatively low on
> resources and dependencies (so highly available across arches and old
> computers or small devices), yet quite polished and focused on
> delivering a good experience. It's picki
Aron Xu (07/07/2012):
> Could you please unblock ttf-wqy-microhei/0.2.0-beta-1.1? In this
> version we've got x-ttcidfont-conf removed, effectively avoids defoma
> for ordinary users who install Recommends by default. Also the
> maintainer scripts are removed to avoid possible breakage when
> conf
On Sun, 2012-07-08 at 19:19 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> If the old unversioned dependency is thus correct still, please
> upload
> a new package which drops that change and let us know.
django-auth-ldap-1.0.19-2 has been uploaded which dropped the versioned
dependency. However, just to clari
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jul 2012 21:52:34 +0100
with message-id <6f18af3cec689df858b8ee8c3e367...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#680864: unblock: zeroc-ice/3.4.2-8.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #680864,
regarding unblock: zeroc-ice/3.4.2-8.1
to be marked as done.
This
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package mumble
Movement on this one had mostly been blocked pending some resolution to
the zeroc-ice ABI breakage, but since people didn't want to relegate it
to unstable/
Roland Stigge (06/07/2012):
> Please take 0.6.3-4 for wheezy. It fixes RC bug #679761.
The diff between testing and unstable appears to be:
262 files changed, 31368 insertions(+), 3572 deletions(-)
That looks a bit too much for my taste. Other release team members might
have another opinion, th
Noël Köthe (07/07/2012):
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package tcpreplay
>
> Fixes RC bug#634538
>
> unblock tcpreplay/3.4.4-1
Which couldn't work given you already have uploaded another re
Your message dated Sun, 8 Jul 2012 22:36:27 +0200
with message-id <20120708203627.ga18...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#680848: unblock: udj-desktop-client/0.5.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #680848,
regarding unblock: udj-desktop-client/0.5.1-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Hi Gregor,
Gregor Jasny (08/07/2012):
> currently the v4l-utils source package builds lib32v4l-0 and
> lib32v4l-dev packages on amd64. I'd like to get rid of them better
> sooner than later. With the recent ia32-libs uploads the last reverse
> dependency vanished. Will the release team grant a fr
Andreas Noteng (08/07/2012):
> Dear release team. I would like to request a freeze exception for
> transgui_4.0.3-2 (allready in unstable). It contains no code change from
> the previous revision, but fixes a minor bug preventing transgui from
> beeing chosen as default .torrent handler in Gnome.
Dear release team. I would like to request a freeze exception for
transgui_4.0.3-2 (allready in unstable). It contains no code change from
the previous revision, but fixes a minor bug preventing transgui from
beeing chosen as default .torrent handler in Gnome. The bug was reported
for Ubuntu on Lau
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Michael Gilbert (02/07/2012):
>> Please unblock package freeglut
>>
>> It fixes 3 bugs: an rc issue (#678571), a release goal (#677735), and
>> an old bug (#331244).
>
> Rewriting the build system is something which really isn't appreciated
Hello,
currently the v4l-utils source package builds lib32v4l-0 and
lib32v4l-dev packages on amd64. I'd like to get rid of them better
sooner than later. With the recent ia32-libs uploads the last reverse
dependency vanished. Will the release team grant a freeze exception
to drop the two cros
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package scanlogd
Fixes RC bug #668722
unblock scanlogd/2.2.5-3.1
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
Your message dated Sun, 8 Jul 2012 13:48:44 -0600
with message-id <20120708194844.ga22...@spike.0x539.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#680699: unblock: flash-kernel/3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #680699,
regarding unblock: flash-kernel/3.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Hello Adam,
On Sunday 08 July 2012 20:56:06 Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> You didn't understand correctly. t-p-u is intended to handle cases
> where the package in unstable is unsuitable for unblocking and an
> important (i.e. RC) bug fix needs to get to testing.
Many thanks for your explaination a
On 08.07.2012 23:37, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> On 08.07.2012 23:10, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
[]
>> Maybe we could make something happen anyway, e.g. by letting it stay for
>> a longer period in unstable before considering an unblock. But I'll let
>> some other team members voice their opinion on this
On 08.07.2012 23:10, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Michael Tokarev (08/07/2012):
>> That version grew a bug which people were hitting often -- #679788,
>> thats the only reason I hurried up with the new version. People
>> started upping severity exactly to STOP it from entering testing.
>> So there's
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package zeroc-ice
This is a minimal fix reverting the API/ABI breakage introduced in -8,
(which accidentally slipped into testing when reopening #672066 didn't
really block t
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package wordpress. The 3.4.1 upstream release is a minor
security & maintenance release.
With wordpress, the only reasonable way that we have to stay on top of
security fixes
Michael Tokarev (08/07/2012):
> That version grew a bug which people were hitting often -- #679788,
> thats the only reason I hurried up with the new version. People
> started upping severity exactly to STOP it from entering testing.
> So there's no way it'd enter testing with this bug, even it i
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jul 2012 20:05:11 +0100
with message-id <8b4ce31d8eb6c445cd37373fec163...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#680853: unblock: libcam-pdf-perl/1.58-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #680853,
regarding unblock: libcam-pdf-perl/1.58-2
to be marked as done.
On 08.07.2012 01:42, Daniele Tricoli wrote:
(Please Cc me on replies, I'm not subscribed)
Hello Release-Team,
I had read your freeze policy document for Wheezy[¹] and I would like
to
ask if circuits 1.6-1[²] can be accepted into
testing-proposed-updates (I
refer to rule #5, if I understood i
On 08.07.2012 10:46, Daigo Moriwaki wrote:
The package in unstable fixes the following issues, which would be of
use
for users and us.
Unfortunately, unblocking it is not possible at the moment.
* debian/patches/20120708_ppc_ftbfs.patch: Imported Ubuntu's patch,
fixing
a build failure
On 08.07.2012 14:30, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Sunday 08 July 2012 06:11 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Thankfully you can read up yourself:
http://release.debian.org/britney/update_excuses.html#open-iscsi
I already had seen that. open-iscsi-udeb depends on scsi-modules,
which
is not built o
On 03.07.2012 13:21, Christian Perrier wrote:
Please unblock package fonts-sil-padauk
This package provides a fonts udeb. There should be few impact on D-I
as the package is in the graphical installer images and the update
will just provide a more complete font for Burmese script.
From a quick
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi
Please unblock package libcam-pdf-perl
In libcam-pdf-perl there where missing (build-)dependencies causing a
FTBFS (#680797). I have fi
On 08.07.2012 19:08, Michael Fladischer wrote:
On Sun, 2012-07-08 at 19:01 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
What's the rationale for:
+ * Bump dependency on python-django to (>= 1.2).
?
Oops, this is a leftover because the package was initialy intented to
be
1.1 which has this dependency. Th
On Sun, 2012-07-08 at 19:01 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> What's the rationale for:
>
> + * Bump dependency on python-django to (>= 1.2).
>
> ?
Oops, this is a leftover because the package was initialy intented to be
1.1 which has this dependency. The correct dependency for 1.0.19 on
django
On 08.07.2012 20:41, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Michael Tokarev (08/07/2012):
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: unblock
>>
>> Please unblock package qemu-kvm. Please note that the package has
>> already been uploaded to u
On 08.07.2012 18:55, Michael Fladischer wrote:
Please unblock package django-auth-ldap
It fixes RC bug #669486 and the only upstream change from 1.0.18 to
.19
is a compatibility fix for django >= 1.3 that prevents deprecation
warnings when used with such a django version.
What's the rational
Hi
Stefano Zacchiroli writes:
> Ansgar has been experimenting with .deb sizes to make the packages
> needed for a minimal desktop installation fit in the first CD. It looks
> like that's doable by switching to xz compression for the involved
> binaries. Would you grant freeze exceptions for pac
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mobile-broadband-provider-info"
* Package name: mobile-broadband-provider-info
Version : 20120708-1
Section : Admin
It builds those binar
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please unblock package django-auth-ldap
It fixes RC bug #669486 and the only upstream change from 1.0.18 to .19
is a compatibility fix for dja
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # meant it close it with my reply - meh
> close 680783
Bug #680783 [release.debian.org] unblock: netsed/1.00b-2.1
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
680783: http://bugs.debian.org/c
Mehdi Dogguy writes ("Re: Possible freeze exception for autopkgtest"):
> On 05/07/12 21:30, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Let me know if there's any more questions you have.
>
> Could you please send us a debdiff between 2.2.2 and the one you want to
> upload?
Uh, I asked about two possible uploads. O
On 08.07.2012 17:09, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
please consider unblocking (and possibly urgenting) the following
udeb-producing packages.
All unblocked and urgented; thanks.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub
On 2012-07-08 18:54, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package netsed
>
> 1.00b-2.1 contains a fix for #676126 (FTBFS and thus RC), changelog is:
>
> netsed (1.00b-2.1) unsta
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package udj-desktop-client
udj-desktop-client 0.5.1-1 is currently in testing. This version is
essentially unusable in Debian due to a missing dependency on
libqt4-s
On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 06:54:47PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Thankfully the upstream diff doesn't look too huge and I trust any
> regression could be easily tracked down.
I'm basically upstream for this, so I believe this is true, yes.
> I've hinted it this way to let
> it stay in unstable
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package xen. It fixes upgrades between incompatible
versions by removing /usr/lib/xen-default. Also it fixes an oversight in
the init script name and finally uses udev to mana
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:02:11 +0200
with message-id <4ff9bd13.7070...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#680407: unblock: liblicense/0.8.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #680407,
regarding unblock: liblicense/0.8.1-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package netsed
1.00b-2.1 contains a fix for #676126 (FTBFS and thus RC), changelog is:
netsed (1.00b-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Add 05-f
Steinar H. Gunderson (02/07/2012):
> I'm looking to see if it would be possible to get a freeze exception
> for snappy (producing libsnappy1 and libsnappy-dev). testing has had
> 1.0.4-1 for a long time; 1.0.5-1, a new upstream release (containing
> mostly performance improvements) has been in uns
Michael Tokarev (08/07/2012):
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package qemu-kvm. Please note that the package has
> already been uploaded to unstable, because I incorrectly assumed it
> is the w
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jul 2012 18:36:34 +0200
with message-id <4ff9b712.9020...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#680541: unblock: mutt/1.5.21-6.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #680541,
regarding unblock: mutt/1.5.21-6.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jul 2012 17:33:13 +0200
with message-id <4ff9a839.9000...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#680728: unblock: linux-igd/1.0+cvs20070630-4 (re-send
with debdiff)
has caused the Debian Bug report #680728,
regarding unblock: linux-igd/1.0+cvs20070630-4
to be marked as do
On 2012-07-08 11:36, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package aolserver4-nsxml
>
> It fixes RC bug #680033. Changelog entry follows:
>
> aolserver4-nsxml (1.5-2.1) unstabl
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Julien Cristau (08/07/2012):
>> Say what? This bumps SONAME compared to the version in wheezy and
>> changes -dev package names, breaking all of the reverse deps in the
>> process. How can that look remotely "good" for an unblock?
>
> Ar
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package zsnes
This upload fixes RC bugs #679526 (Multi-arch support) and #679826
(segfault of zsnes:i386 on amd64 machines).
There are a few other changes, namely :
Hi release team,
please consider unblocking (and possibly urgenting) the following
udeb-producing packages. If you have a preferred format for those,
please say so, and I'll use that in further requests. (I guess
keeping the rationale in the hints file would make sense, that's
why I didn't merge a
Giuseppe Iuculano (08/07/2012):
> please remove chromium-browser (armhf) 17.0.963.83~r127885-1 from
> testing and force chromium-browser 20.0.1132.43~r143823-1 in testing.
> We will try to fix FTBFS in armel and armhf in the next upload.
Excuses say:
out of date on armhf: chromium, chromium-bro
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jul 2012 16:56:44 +0200
with message-id <4ff99fac.2090...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#680736: unblock: lives/1.6.2~ds1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #680736,
regarding unblock: lives/1.6.2~ds1-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Julien Cristau (08/07/2012):
> Say what? This bumps SONAME compared to the version in wheezy and
> changes -dev package names, breaking all of the reverse deps in the
> process. How can that look remotely "good" for an unblock?
Argh, failed to 'd' it after having started by reading the debdiff
On 08.07.2012 17:08, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Michael Tokarev (08/07/2012):
>> #680342 - http://bugs.debian.org/679377
>> xargs applet does not implement basic POSIX-specified features
>
> Question: is it expected it's not available in the initramfs?
it is not available there now (before the las
I have attached the diff between current "testing" and "unstable" versions.
Anton
freeglut.diff
Description: Binary data
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
