Hi,
On Sun, 10 Jun 2012, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Asking to be sure: For sbuild, that means instead of changing the file
> debian/changelog before starting the build, a new file
> debian/changelog.binary-rebuild (or however it is named) is created
> and from there on all works "by itself"?
That's t
+1 from /me on not releasing suhosin in wheezy...
Ondřej Surý
On 11. 6. 2012, at 22:22, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we as the former (and again) maintainers of suhosin are a little bit worried
> about the current state of suhosin in Debian.
>
> A short introduction about suhosin. Suhosin
Hi,
we as the former (and again) maintainers of suhosin are a little bit worried
about the current state of suhosin in Debian.
A short introduction about suhosin. Suhosin is a security extension for php
which contains of two parts: a patch for php and an extension. Suhosin
extends php with severa
On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 15:40 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Also, limitations in the existing testing migration tools are making
> wine not considered for wheezy, since those tools don't check whether
> dependencies for 'Multi-Arch: allowed' packages are satisfied by
> packages on other architectur
Hi,
We've been getting a few bug reports from users attempting to install
multiarch wine who have yet to manually enable multiarch itself.
Obviously that is a failure on their part, and is easily correctable.
However, I wonder if we can't make such migrations a bit more
straightforward?
In partic
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 671115 with 676083
Bug #671115 [release.debian.org] transition: mysql-5.5
671115 was blocked by: 674328 675836 676595 673528 650059 667428 673263 650058
660686 674122 649955 651110 674309 672714 650060 672950 666331 672619 673264
672716 67
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 671115 by 677114
Bug #671115 [release.debian.org] transition: mysql-5.5
671115 was blocked by: 674328 675836 676595 650059 673528 667428 673263 650058
674122 660686 649955 651110 674309 672714 650060 672619 666331 672950 672716
673264 6513
Julien Cristau writes:
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 19:07:38 +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>
>> What is clear is that the atlas binaries built on the amd64 buildds
>> should not have the problem that is affecting the current amd64 binary
>> (for example I tested the binary for 3.8.4-3 which was b
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 18:19:20 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Dear release team,
>
> I have NMUed most of the remaining packages that build-depended on
> libjpeg62-dev.
>
> I think the only remaining packages are:
> compiz-fusion-plugins-main
> kphotoalbum
>
> but they seems quite old.
>
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 13:28:51 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 12:34 AM, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 11:30:30PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> >> Isn't python 2.6 going away? I have just removed libdb4.8-dev in a
> >
> > I'm not sure, but argued a
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 19:07:38 +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> What is clear is that the atlas binaries built on the amd64 buildds
> should not have the problem that is affecting the current amd64 binary
> (for example I tested the binary for 3.8.4-3 which was built on buildds
> and it is san
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 13:52:17 +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> > If you agree, I'd go on uploading a new dummy transitional lv2core [1] to
> > ensure a smooth transition [2].
>
> Any news?
>
I don't understand if/how this affects the tr
Your message dated Mon, 11 Jun 2012 18:39:11 +0200
with message-id <20120611163911.gv31...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#655912: transition: libupnp3 -> libupnp6
has caused the Debian Bug report #655912,
regarding transition: libupnp3 -> libupnp6
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Mon, 11 Jun 2012 18:37:53 +0200
with message-id <20120611163753.gt31...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#653823: transition: boost-defaults
has caused the Debian Bug report #653823,
regarding transition: boost-defaults 1.49
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
Your message dated Mon, 11 Jun 2012 18:38:36 +0200
with message-id <20120611163836.gu31...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#645105: transition: gdal
has caused the Debian Bug report #645105,
regarding transition: gdal
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 671115 with 676083
Bug #671115 [release.debian.org] transition: mysql-5.5
671115 was blocked by: 674328 675836 676595 673528 650059 667428 673263 650058
660686 674122 649955 651110 674309 672714 650060 672950 666331 672619 673264
672716 65
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 671115 with 676595
Bug #671115 [release.debian.org] transition: mysql-5.5
671115 was blocked by: 674328 675836 650059 673528 667428 673263 650058 660686
674122 649955 651110 674309 672714 650060 666331 672619 672950 672716 673264
651317 67
On 09.06.2012 19:39, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2012-06-09 at 18:02 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Everything looks good and the old libraries were decrufted
(increasing
fossology's brokenness). The original upload would be over 10 days
old
now, so I'm looking at aging things for tonight's
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 05:31:18PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Touko Korpela (08/06/2012):
> > > diff -ruN ttb-1.0.1.orig/debian/control ttb-1.0.1/debian/control
> > > --- ttb-1.0.1.orig/debian/control 2012-06-08 10:49:51.0
> > > +0200
> > > +++ ttb-1.0.1/debian/control2012-
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> If you agree, I'd go on uploading a new dummy transitional lv2core [1] to
> ensure a smooth transition [2].
Any news?
--
Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com
Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org
Ubuntu Core Developer
Guillem Jover writes ("Re: [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#676686: libxslt1.1: libxslt1.1
binNMUbroke multi-arch installability"):
> As I mentioned in the long ref-counting thread, I strongly disagree this
> is a correct solution, it just seems like a hack to me. Instead I
> think we should consider chang
Mike Hommey (11/06/2012):
> Could you hint iceape so that it goes to testing sooner? I forgot to
> bump its urgency when uploading (it is a security update release)
# 20120611
# ROM -- security update:
age-days 2 iceape/2.7.5-1
Thanks.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
22 matches
Mail list logo
