Uncoordinated google-perftools transition

2012-05-27 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, I noticed you have started a transition on the google-perftools side, which can be seen through the excuses[1]: | google-perftools (1.7-1 to 2.0-2) | | Maintainer: Daigo Moriwaki | 58 days old (needed 10 days) | out of date on i386: libgoogle-perftools0, libgoogle-perftools0-dbg,

Re: sox transition

2012-05-27 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hello again Pascal. Pascal Giard (25/05/2012): > On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: > > Scheduled. > > Thanks! We're almost done, but #668793 gets in the way, through mlt. Once that fixed, britney should be more or less happy to migrate the whole lot to testing (with some h

Bug#673059: marked as done (transition: libindicator, libindicate)

2012-05-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2012 00:09:24 +0200 with message-id <20120527220924.gb23...@mraw.org> and subject line Re: Bug#673059: transition: libindicator, libindicate has caused the Debian Bug report #673059, regarding transition: libindicator, libindicate to be marked as done. This means tha

Re: Uncoordinated h323plus transition

2012-05-27 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Cyril Brulebois (24/05/2012): > it seems like we have an uncoordinated transition, from libh323-1.21.0 > to libh323-1.24.0. The following packages need binNMUs: > | # Broken Depends: > | openam: openam [amd64 armel armhf i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 s390x > sparc] > | openmcu: openmcu [amd6

Re: short-term plans for libtiff

2012-05-27 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
I wonder whether I might be able to get some kind of response on my proposal to upload a tiff with libtiff5-alt-dev. To help you make a decision, I'm supplying the information you probably need. I'm hoping you'll be able to give me a quick decision, or at least give me a quick response indicating

Re: Uncoordinated quantlib transition

2012-05-27 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 27 May 2012 at 09:55, peter green wrote: | >| At least for s390 the problem is not buildd resources. s390 has a 31bit | >| address space, which g++ manages to exhaust compiling this insane source | >| file. That can't be fixed by rescheduling. | | >So what do we do? | | My suggestion woul

Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#674541: ruby1.8: threaded code segfaults under kfreebsd-*

2012-05-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unblock 674541 with 645105 Bug #674541 [src:ruby1.8] ruby1.8: segfaults when compiled with gcc-4.7 674541 was blocked by: 645105 674541 was blocking: 645105 Removed blocking bug(s) of 674541: 645105 > block 645105 with 674541 Bug #645105 [release.

Bug#674759: RM: thoggen/0.7.1-1

2012-05-27 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Please remove thoggen from testing. It's RC-buggy since 7 months, has no rev-deps and the last maintainer upload was in 2008. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-relea

Bug#668654: marked as done (transition: libmemcached)

2012-05-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 27 May 2012 14:08:56 +0200 with message-id <4fc21958.90...@dogguy.org> and subject line Re: Bug#668654: transition: libmemcached has caused the Debian Bug report #668654, regarding transition: libmemcached to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Processed: Re: Bug#674750: transition: libnunit2.6

2012-05-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 674750 pending Bug #674750 [release.debian.org] transition: libnunit2.6 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 674750: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674750 Deb

Bug#674750: transition: libnunit2.6

2012-05-27 Thread Cyril Brulebois
tag 674750 pending thanks Jo Shields (27/05/2012): > Ben parameters as follows: > > Affected: .build-depends ~ /libnunit-cil-dev/ > Good: .depends ~ /libnunit2.6-cil/ > Bad: .depends ~ /libnunit2.5-cil/ I changed the affected line, but the tracker is at: http://release.debian.org/transitions/

Bug#672117: transition: libextractor

2012-05-27 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Samstag, 26. Mai 2012, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > libextractor-python | python-extractor uninstallable: #674616 > doddle | FTBFS: #674333 > libextractor-java| FTBFS: #674359 I've just successfully rebuild these on sid/amd64 with the versions in experimental and would be w

Bug#673800: marked as done (transition: grib-api)

2012-05-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
stay because of: > > # Broken Depends: > > magics++: libmagplus3 [amd64 armel armhf i386 ia64 kfreebsd-amd64 > > kfreebsd-i386 mipsel powerpc s390] > > I've just moved the tracker from ongoing to finished, and I'll > investigate this magics++ thing later on. Easily

Bug#674750: transition: libnunit2.6

2012-05-27 Thread Jo Shields
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition We would really like to update the unit testing library in Wheezy from version 2.5.x to the stable 2.6 release. Unfortunately this requires a small ABI break. One major factor for us in r

Bug#672117: transition: libextractor

2012-05-27 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Sonntag, 27. Mai 2012, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > This also means that vdr (and dozens of related packages) can't migrate, eek. > Alternative way of getting stuff unfucked at this point: reupload the > old package (with an epoch, or with a $foo.really-is.$bar trick), until > you're able to

Bug#672117: transition: libextractor

2012-05-27 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Cyril Brulebois (26/05/2012): > libextractor-python | python-extractor uninstallable: #674616 > doddle | FTBFS: #674333 > fossology| FTBFS: #674381 > libextractor-java| FTBFS: #674359 > > (No, I didn't look into gnunet*, too much fail already.) This also means that

Bug#673800: transition: grib-api

2012-05-27 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Cyril Brulebois (21/05/2012): > Tracker is at: > http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/grib-api.html grib-api was decrufted by ftpmasters, and could finally migrate to testing: grib-api | 1.9.16-2 | testing | source grib-api | 1.9.16-2 | unstable | source The old binari

Re: Uncoordinated quantlib transition

2012-05-27 Thread peter green
| At least for s390 the problem is not buildd resources. s390 has a 31bit | address space, which g++ manages to exhaust compiling this insane source | file. That can't be fixed by rescheduling. So what do we do? My suggestion would be to drop the optimisation level to -O1 (and if that fail