On 16.05.2012 04:06, shirish शिरीष wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 00:30 +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:55 PM, shirish शिरीष
wrote:
--2012-05-16 00:13:05--
http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20120511T175706Z
in-line :-
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 00:30 +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote:
>> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:55 PM, shirish शिरीष
>> wrote:
>> This is the latest effort with another mirror, as can be seen also stuck :-
> [...]
>> ---
* Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk) [120515 22:26]:
> On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 21:45 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 20:42:14 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 20:42 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > > I'd add a concern about the mips bui
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 672207 -moreinfo
Bug #672207 [amarok] [amarok] Fails to open internal database after upgrade to
mysql 5.5 from 5.1
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #672207 to the same tags previously set
> block 671115 by 672207
Bug #671115 [release.deb
On Tue, 15 May 2012 06:30:15 Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Please upload to unstable whenever you're ready (fast is good, freeze is
> close).
Thanks KiBi,
on the way now..
Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
>> Are you sure this is right?
>> Shouldn't the headers and libs still be found automatically?
>>
>> Olaf
>
>
> Normally yes, but I am pretty sure that the patch would not be backwards
> compatible.
What patch, exactly?
--
Olaf
--
To UN
Pino Toscano (15/05/2012):
> > > > > - pykde4 (needs binNMUed kdepimlibs)
> >
> > … so not scheduled.
>
> Could you please schedule it now?
> Note that it needs kde4libs >= 4:4.7.4-5, so please add a proper d-w on
> that.
Scheduled on the archs were kde4libs got built already. Will schedule
th
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 22:10 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
[...]
> >>> On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 21:22 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 15/05/12 17:18, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > http://release.debian.org/wheezy/arch_qualify.html
>
> Should we add a row labeled "auto-signing" there?
[...]
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 09:45:43PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 20:42:14 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 20:42 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 16:18:19 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > > In an effort to stop this stalli
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 08:41:08PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> It might be worth considering as a criterion for wheezy+1, I'm not sure
> it's beneficial to enforce it as a blocker for wheezy. In any case,
> it's not really something that the porters can comment on / change,
> unless they also
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 21:45 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 20:42:14 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 20:42 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > I'd add a concern about the mips buildds to the arch qual page (not sure
> > > how to phrase it).
> >
> >
On 15/05/12 21:58, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 21:51 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 15/05/12 21:41, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 21:22 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 15/05/12 17:18, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
http://release.debian.org/wheezy/arch_qualify.html
Shou
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: britney
In doop_source britney has the following if-statement (indentation reduced):
"""
# if the binary already exists (built from another source)
if binary in binaries[parch][0]:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 20:58:06 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> In any case, I'm not going to unilaterally add new criteria right now.
> If there's consensus that it should be included, then we can of course
> look at that.
>
... for the next release.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description:
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 21:51 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 15/05/12 21:41, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 21:22 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> >> On 15/05/12 17:18, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >>> http://release.debian.org/wheezy/arch_qualify.html
> >>
> >> Should we add a row labeled
On 15/05/12 21:41, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 21:22 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 15/05/12 17:18, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
http://release.debian.org/wheezy/arch_qualify.html
Should we add a row labeled "auto-signing" there?
auto-signing makes things less a PITA and make trans
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 00:30 +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:55 PM, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> This is the latest effort with another mirror, as can be seen also stuck :-
[...]
> -
> 100 files not found in previous
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 20:42:14 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 20:42 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 16:18:19 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > In an effort to stop this stalling any further / longer, I propose
> > > sending [1] to each of the por
Hi,
Alle sabato 12 maggio 2012, Cyril Brulebois ha scritto:
> > > > - kdepimlibs (needs binNMUed akonadi)
>
> FTBFS due to gcc fun…
This is now fixed.
> > > > - pykde4 (needs binNMUed kdepimlibs)
>
> … so not scheduled.
Could you please schedule it now?
Note that it needs kde4libs >= 4:4.7.4-
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 20:42 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 16:18:19 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > In an effort to stop this stalling any further / longer, I propose
> > sending [1] to each of the port lists, probably some time tomorrow.
> >
> > Comments / changes / upda
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 21:22 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 15/05/12 17:18, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > http://release.debian.org/wheezy/arch_qualify.html
>
> Should we add a row labeled "auto-signing" there?
>
> auto-signing makes things less a PITA and make transitions run (a bit)
> faster. It'd
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
I'd like to get the latest libindicator, libindicate and libdbusmenu into
Debian before the freeze. Latest means in this case "same version as in
Ubuntu 12.04 LTS" which I hope to be
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 20:58 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 04:18:19PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > With the sound of the ever approaching freeze ringing loudly in our
> > ears, we're (somewhat belatedly) looking at finalising the list of
> > release architectures for the W
On 15/05/12 17:18, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
http://release.debian.org/wheezy/arch_qualify.html
Should we add a row labeled "auto-signing" there?
auto-signing makes things less a PITA and make transitions run (a bit)
faster. It'd be very nice if we could require auto-signing for release
architect
in-line :-
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:55 PM, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> I have tried with both http:// omfpr,atopm
meant to say had tried both http://http.debian.org as well as
ftp://ftp.debian.org but somehow get stuck somewhere.
This is the latest effort with another mirror, as can be seen also s
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 04:18:19PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In an effort to stop this stalling any further / longer, I propose
> sending [1] to each of the port lists, probably some time tomorrow.
>
> Comments / changes / updates / whatever welcome.
>
> Regards,
>
> Adam
>
> [1]
On 15/05/12 09:49, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Nicholas Bamber
wrote:
Thomas,
I attach a patch to enbale libdbi-drivers to build against the latest
Are you sure this is right?
Shouldn't the headers and libs still be found automatically?
Olaf
Normally
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 16:18:19 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In an effort to stop this stalling any further / longer, I propose
> sending [1] to each of the port lists, probably some time tomorrow.
>
> Comments / changes / updates / whatever welcome.
>
I'd add a concern about the mi
Hi all,
I have been trying to use jigdo to download DVD 1 and keep getting
stuck at one file in the download.
In fact the download on this isn't smooth in anyway . Here's what I
get when I try to download it via jigdo :-
100 files not found in previous pass, trying
alternative download locations:
On 2012-05-15 17:18, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In an effort to stop this stalling any further / longer, I propose
> sending [1] to each of the port lists, probably some time tomorrow.
>
> Comments / changes / updates / whatever welcome.
>
> Regards,
>
> Adam
>
> [...]
>
>
Sounds goo
Hi,
d...@debian.org (15/05/2012):
> On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 01:44:53PM +0900, HIGUCHI Daisuke (VDR dai) wrote:
> > I'd like to upload uim 1:1.8.0-2 which has changed SONAME (libuim7 =>
> > libuim8),
> > to unstable (1:1.8.0-1 in experimental, with no change).
> >
> > Accepted uim 1:1.8.0-1 (sou
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 01:44:53PM +0900, HIGUCHI Daisuke (VDR dai) wrote:
> I'd like to upload uim 1:1.8.0-2 which has changed SONAME (libuim7 =>
> libuim8),
> to unstable (1:1.8.0-1 in experimental, with no change).
>
> Accepted uim 1:1.8.0-1 (source all amd64)
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/u
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 12:19:07 +0200
with message-id <20120515101907.ga8...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#672827: transition: x264
has caused the Debian Bug report #672827,
regarding transition: x264
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Nicholas Bamber
wrote:
> Thomas,
> I attach a patch to enbale libdbi-drivers to build against the latest
Are you sure this is right?
Shouldn't the headers and libs still be found automatically?
Olaf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sorry, this was meant for Bug #671675.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPsgIjAAoJEHEVr9B3ENz3HjQQAMJqLHIVdStXMTvLyBHrYUq6
8Ci/beU1UzP8bE0RL0
The cause is just that I accidently removed the libcext-dev section from
the debian/control file. Simply re-inserting does the job (already done
in the git repository; not uploaded yet because of the unresolved FTBS).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a s
36 matches
Mail list logo
