Adam D. Barratt (07/05/2012):
> I've scheduled binNMUs for most of level 1 on the tracker, with the
> exception of geeqie which has a pre-existing FTBFS bug; setting that
> as a blocker.
FWIW, as mentioned on IRC: #669543 is being 0-day NMU'd as I write.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description:
menting them as errata for alpha 1. In the
meanwhile, I've pushed my master branch along with a signed tag for
20120507, and the upload of the generated amd64 images is going on.
Whether this is the one labelled alpha 1 or not isn't exactly my call,
but I guess it's mostly about PR e
On Sun, 2012-05-06 at 10:35 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-05-06 at 02:23 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > On 05.05.2012 16:26, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2012-05-05 at 16:15 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > So I'd kindly ask you to binNMU clutter-gst, clutter-imcontext and
>
On 07.05.2012 20:19, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Julien Cristau (07/05/2012):
>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 16:19:00 +, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>
>>> gcc-defaults (1.118) unstable; urgency=low . * Default to GCC 4.7 for
>>> gcc, g++, gfortran on amd64, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386 and
>>> hur
Julien Cristau (07/05/2012):
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 16:19:00 +, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> > gcc-defaults (1.118) unstable; urgency=low
> > .
> >* Default to GCC 4.7 for gcc, g++, gfortran on amd64, i386,
> > kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386 and hurd-i386.
>
> Please revert this ch
Processing changes file: linux-kernel-di-mipsel-2.6_1.31+squeeze7_multi.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6_1.63+squeeze7_multi.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6_1.64+squeeze7_multi.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux-kern
GCC 4.7 is now the default for x86 architectures for all frontends except the D
frontends, including KFreeBSD and the Hurd.
There are still some build failures which need to be addressed. Out of the ~350
bugs filed, more than the half are fixed, another quarter has patches available,
and the remai
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 16:19:00 +, Matthias Klose wrote:
> gcc-defaults (1.118) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>* Default to GCC 4.7 for gcc, g++, gfortran on amd64, i386,
> kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386 and hurd-i386.
Please revert this change. There are still too many open bugs on
h
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 02:37:56PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >
> > Debian have access to at least one Power7 machine located at OSUOSL. The
> > machine list shows three LPAR running on it.
>
> Yes, the project has these resources. But a kernel porter will of
> course need to install and test
On Mon, 07 May 2012 00:04:35 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > > Specifically, a loss of error handling. […]
> > Hm, good catch.
> > Maybe it's better to give this a second look ...
> Given the above, it very much looks like fixing that bug properly in
> unstable first (which is what we encourage
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear Release Team,
I am filing this bug for the transition of the "cpl" package.
Upstream released a new version 6.0 on April 1st, bumping the ABI
version (SONAME) from 12 to 20.
List
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 656829 with 669543
Bug #656829 [release.debian.org] transition: exiv2 - libexiv2-9 -> libexiv2-11
656829 was blocked by: 653919
656829 was blocking: 650516
Added blocking bug(s) of 656829: 669543
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please co
block 656829 with 669543
thanks
On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 23:48 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> David Paleino (27/04/2012):
> > I meant: what are the plans to start it?
>
> The plan now is: let's go! :)
I've scheduled binNMUs for most of level 1 on the tracker, with the
exception of geeqie which ha
On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 08:19:40PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 21:21:55 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
>
> > Generally the official C interface is the most widely used and should be
> > not affected
> > by any change.
> >
> OK let's go ahead with this then. Than
On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 09:48 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 11:24:48PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > * s390/s390x: Actively supported upstream by IBM.
>
> Sometimes to actively supported. :-)
>
> >Only runs in virtual
> >
Processing changes file: base-files_6.0squeeze5_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1srlhc-0007f5...@franck.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 653903 + pending
Bug #653903 [release.debian.org] transition: qt4-x11 multiarch
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
653903: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=6
reassign 276274 texlive-extra-utils
reassign 375819 texlive-extra-utils
reassign 503752 texlive-extra-utils
reassign 603707 texlive-extra-utils
reassign 609642 texlive-extra-utils
reassign 615943 texlive-extra-utils
reassign 468225 texlive-extra-utils
reassign 276275 texlive-extra-utils
stop
On 07
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 11:24:48PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> * s390/s390x: Actively supported upstream by IBM.
Sometimes to actively supported. :-)
>Only runs in virtual
> machines,
It runs in three different environments: Bare hardware, LP
On Sun, May 6, 2012 10:00, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Sat, May 5, 2012 20:49, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> On Sat, 2012-05-05 at 20:39 +0200, Ondrej Sury wrote:
>>> > For some reason I had it in my head that 5.4.2 was the upstream
>>> version
>>> > with the fixed fix rather than the not-quite fixed f
20 matches
Mail list logo
