On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 11:00 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2012-04-14 13:59, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Thanks for working on fixing this in stable. fwiw, "-6+squeeze1" is
> > more conventional, although it's unlikely to make a difference in this
> > case. Please feel free to go ahead with t
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu shogun_1.1.0-4 . ALL . -m "Binary rebuild against numpy 1.6.1 in sid"
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (600, 'unst
On 2012-04-20 22:32, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 12:44 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Per discussions on #d-release, we have decided to postpone the meeting
>> till some time after Easter.
>
> It's now distinctly after Easter, and we need to look at rescheduling
> this.
>
> Do
On 2012-04-22 10:42, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 09:32:40PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 12:44 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>> Per discussions on #d-release, we have decided to postpone the meeting
>>> till some time after Easter.
>>
>> It's now dis
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Dear Release Team,
Subsequent to the upload of armadillo 3, dolfin needs a rebuild.
nmu dolfin_1.0.0-4 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against armadillo (>= 1:3.0.1+dfsg)"
gdal also needs a rebuild, b
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 03:11:35PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> I notice that my initial patch didn't handle the library dependency
> part. I'm attaching a new patch that fixes this issue. This makes new
> packages built against the patched libc0.1-dev depend on libc0.1 >=
> 2.13-31.
El 22 d’abril de 2012 17:08, Aurelien Jarno ha escrit:
> I have been mostly away from Debian stuff in the last weeks due to
> moving, but i'll try to catchup with glibc stuff during the next days
> and schedule an upload for the middle of the week.
Good to hear, thanks.
--
Robert Millan
--
To
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> owner 668806 pkg-xfce-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Bug #668806 [release.debian.org] nmu for xfce4-panel dependencies
Owner recorded as pkg-xfce-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assis
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 16:33:58 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> Xfce 4.10 is around the corner, and like last time, we have some changes
> in the panel which break the plugins built against the previous (4.8)
> panel.
>
> Like last time, we'd like to push a new 4.8 xfce4-panel with shlibs
> li
Your message dated Sun, 22 Apr 2012 12:38:58 +0200
with message-id <20120422103858.ga14...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#664428: [release.debian.org] update_output.txt.gz
compressed twice
has caused the Debian Bug report #664428,
regarding [release.debian.org] update_output.txt.gz co
On dim., 2012-04-22 at 12:33 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 16:33:58 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
>
> > Xfce 4.10 is around the corner, and like last time, we have some changes
> > in the panel which break the plugins built against the previous (4.8)
> > panel.
> >
> >
Your message dated Sun, 22 Apr 2012 12:21:57 +0200
with message-id <20120422102157.gi4...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#659202: transition: t38modem 2.0.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #659202,
regarding transition: ptlib opal t38modem ekiga
to be marked as done.
This means that y
Your message dated Sun, 22 Apr 2012 12:58:42 +0200
with message-id <20120422105842.ga14...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#664447: [release.debian.org] britney: removes package
removed by auto-cruft even though it's not cruft in testing (konq-plugins)
has caused the Debian Bug report #
Hi,
I notice that my initial patch didn't handle the library dependency
part. I'm attaching a new patch that fixes this issue. This makes new
packages built against the patched libc0.1-dev depend on libc0.1 >=
2.13-31.
VERY IMPORTANT NOTICE: if this patch is introduced in a later
version
On Sat, 2012-04-21 at 23:38 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> I've prepared the upload and uploaded to stable. Debdiff below, please
> tell me if somehting is missing (haven't done that for ages).
The intention was to send the debdiff /before/ the upload, not at the
same time.
As Julien mentioned, yo
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 09:32:40PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 12:44 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > Per discussions on #d-release, we have decided to postpone the meeting
> > till some time after Easter.
>
> It's now distinctly after Easter, and we need to look at resche
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 23:38:17 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> +texlive-base (2009-12) stable; urgency=low
You need to use a different version number, you already uploaded a
package with this version last August. 2009-11+squeeze1 would be the
usual pattern.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Descrip
17 matches
Mail list logo
