On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 09:35:20PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > Armadillo 3 has been released with an soname change. The revers
> > > dependencies gdal and dolfin build fine, so a binNMU should be
> > > sufficient. May I go ahead and upload the new package to unstable?
> >
> > A gentle prod?
On 17.04.2012 23:36, OndÅej Surý wrote:
I will check with doko, but I think it's no longer true as python has included
support for bdb 5.1.
But let me get back to you tomorrow, when I have full internet access.
OndÅej Surý
On 17. 4. 2012, at 21:32, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 669098 src:qapt qapt/1.3.0-1
Bug #669098 [qapt] qapt FTBFS MD5Summation and debMD5 undeclared
Bug reassigned from package 'qapt' to 'src:qapt'.
No longer marked as found in versions 1.3.0-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 665969 + pending
Bug #665969 [release.debian.org] transition: apt 0.9.0
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
665969: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=665969
De
I will check with doko, but I think it's no longer true as python has included
support for bdb 5.1.
But let me get back to you tomorrow, when I have full internet access.
Ondřej Surý
On 17. 4. 2012, at 21:32, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 15:09:05 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 665969 with 669163 669061 669151
Bug #665969 [release.debian.org] transition: apt 0.9.0
665969 was not blocked by any bugs.
665969 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 665969: 669163, 669061, and 669151
> thanks
Stopping proce
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 09:59:09AM +0200, Michael Vogt wrote:
> > > Problems reported so far include:
> > >
> > > E: Method http has died unexpectedly!
> > > E: Sub-process http received signal 10.
> >
> > This is #669061
>
> This appears to be Sparc only, right? We do had trouble with
> alignme
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 668456 + confirmed squeeze
Bug #668456 [release.debian.org] pu: package wicd/1.7.0+ds1-5+squeeze1
Added tag(s) squeeze and confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
668456: http://bugs.debian
tags 668456 + confirmed squeeze
thanks
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 00:31 +0200, David Paleino wrote:
> I'm hereby requesting permission to upload a fix for wicd to p-u, bug #668397
> (CCed), CVE-2012-2095. "git diff" attached.
>
> The patch for stable is slightly different from the one just pushed in
>
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 15:09:05 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> The only real obstacle is python, but since it started using db5.1, I
> think it won't be a big problem (like bumping from 4.8 to 5.1).
>
I thought bumping to 5.1 already required ignoring test failures? That
seems rather like a proble
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 06:21:51 -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 08:54:42PM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> > Dear Release Team,
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:47:13PM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> > > Thanks for the pointer. I have ensured that the reverse dependencies
>
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 03:09:05PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> libreoffice: CHECK-NEEDED (but it's so huge and there was no problem before)
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/tree/configure.in?h=libreoffice-3-5#n5113:
[...]
for dbver in 5.1 5.0 5 4.8 4.7 4; do
for dash
Hi release team,
here is the list of packages which are not binNMUable right away:
bogofilter: unrelated-FTBFS (#660717) (test suite failure, so it compiles fine)
ggcov: unrelated-FTBFS (#669099) (test suite failure, so it compiles fine)
gridengine: PATCH-NEEDED (but compiles ok when patched)
lib
Hi Norbert,
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 19:09:04 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Mi, 04 Apr 2012, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
>> > Also #666293 (dvi2ps), which I missed before.
>>
>> I remembered that dvi2ps caused problem when we upgraded
>> to kpathsea5.
>> It looks the maintainer is not active recent
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 08:54:42PM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> Dear Release Team,
>
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:47:13PM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> > Thanks for the pointer. I have ensured that the reverse dependencies
> > build fine.
> >
> > Now, I am ready to go ahead and upload it and req
Kohda-san,
On Mi, 04 Apr 2012, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> > Also #666293 (dvi2ps), which I missed before.
>
> I remembered that dvi2ps caused problem when we upgraded
> to kpathsea5.
> It looks the maintainer is not active recently but I found
> the upstream has released new version which is base
On 17.04.2012 08:59, Michael Vogt wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 09:47:21PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 21:40 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> E: Method http has died unexpectedly!
> E: Sub-process http received signal 10.
This is #669061
This appears to be Sparc only,
Just FYI, I am doing a check for all reverse dependencies on libdb{,4.8,5.1}-dev
and the result so far are quite good:
Number of binNMUable packages: 61
Number of packages I still need to check[*]: 22
Number of packages with invalid dependency on libdb*-dev: 5
The rest of the packages in the trac
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 09:47:21PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 21:40 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 21:44 +0200, Michael Vogt wrote:
> > > Ok, thanks! Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help
> > > at this point.
> >
> > It looks
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 11:47:37PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:58:21PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 07:34:46PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > Oh, also request-tracker3.8 can't go away without
> > > - rtfm
> > > - rt-extension-em
20 matches
Mail list logo
