On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 00:05 -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
> please hint fsl 4.1.9-4+b1 on armel, mips, mipsel. It seems to have got
> stuck on these architectures for about 6 days according to
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=fsl
"hint" is a testing migration term, it doesn
please hint fsl 4.1.9-4+b1 on armel, mips, mipsel. It seems to have got
stuck on these architectures for about 6 days according to
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=fsl
thanks
--
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-releas
Dear Release Team,
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:47:13PM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> Thanks for the pointer. I have ensured that the reverse dependencies
> build fine.
>
> Now, I am ready to go ahead and upload it and request binNMUs, if the
> release team is all right with it.
Armadillo 3 has be
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 667863 + pending
Bug #667863 [release.debian.org] transition: octave 3.2 -> 3.6
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
667863: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=6
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2012 20:40:33 +0200
with message-id <20120412184033.gw22...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#668461: RM: request-tracker3.8/3.8.11-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #668461,
regarding RM: request-tracker3.8/3.8.11-1
to be marked as done.
This means that y
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 16:24:56 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> As this is a rather serious and publicised issue, an urgency bump would be
> particularly appreciated, if possible.
>
I made it 2 days.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 06/04/12 16:16, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
Le 06/04/2012 13:00, Joachim Breitner a écrit :
I regularly check
http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/haskell.html, it is a
great tool. But I am confused why it says haskell-sfml-audio,
-openal and -alut is bad on armel armhf mips mipsel ppc s390
Dear release team,
Can you consider to urgency bump samba/2:3.6.4-1 for security issue
CVE-2012-1182? The debdiff is indeed 2 MB, however, this is because the
bug is in the source for generated code which makes the resulting diff
rather large. The upstream release contains no other changes. I'm
at
8 matches
Mail list logo