Adam D. Barratt dixit:
>Erm, no. The mail you've replied to is about an issue in texlive, which
>has nothing to do with either stable-security or info/dir.gz files.
Oops. Sorry. It went directly beneath the cvs one in my INBOX,
and so I was confused.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
“Having a smoking sec
Adam D. Barratt dixit:
>Ping?
buildd.d.o doesn’t have stable-security build logs, but the
package showed up in the meantime. It does not contain the
dir file, so I’m considering the issue solved (for now).
bye,
//mirabilos
--
“Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having
Processing changes file: cvs_1.12.13-12+squeeze1+b1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1sghhl-0006dd...@franck.debian.org
On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 22:23 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt dixit:
>
> >Ping?
>
> buildd.d.o doesn’t have stable-security build logs, but the
> package showed up in the meantime. It does not contain the
> dir file, so I’m considering the issue solved (for now).
Erm, no. The mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 652650 with 667826
Bug #652650 [release.debian.org] transition: imagemagick
652650 was blocked by: 665256 664943 663010
652650 was blocking: 666126
Added blocking bug(s) of 652650: 667826
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 16:53:23 +0100, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> The newer imagemagick package just uploaded to unstable (6.7.4.0-1)
> introduces an ABI change, without API change. BinNMUs should be enough
> this time.
>
A number of package build-depend on libmagickcore{,4}-extra, and will
nee
ah -- sorry, went off my radar... IIRC there were no additional changes
necessary, right?
Meanwhile -- I will build the package on stable and upload it.
On Fri, 06 Apr 2012, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-02-18 at 16:10 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 10:36 -0500,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 666126 with 652650 666067
Bug #666126 [release.debian.org] transition: poppler 0.18
666126 was blocked by: 651169 651385 651388 651386 660937
666126 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 666126: 666067 and 652650
> thanks
Stopp
Your message dated Fri, 6 Apr 2012 22:49:04 +0200
with message-id <20120406204904.gd22...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#667819: Second half of nmus for hardened build flags
has caused the Debian Bug report #667819,
regarding Second half of nmus for hardened build flags
to be marked as
On Sat, 2012-02-18 at 16:10 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 10:36 -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> > full patch attached -- I just want to hear your feedback first and
> > then will do additional testing to assure correct behavior on a stable
> > system
>
> Well, even lenny
On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 21:32 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 21:08 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sat, 2011-11-05 at 08:51 +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> > > On 11/04/2011 08:08 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 18:57 +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> >
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 21:26 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 18:18 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 01:39:03PM +0100, Patrick Winnertz wrote:
> > > > Impressive design. What would happen if it skips half of the "config"?
> > > > I
> > > > agree that not
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 20:20 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-03-12 at 14:16 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sat, 2011-03-12 at 12:52 +, Carl Chenet wrote:
> > > The rdiff-backup version currently in Squeeze triggers an annoying
> > > Python deprecation warning message in some
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 20:00 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> As far as I can tell, the line was commented out somewhere between the
> version in squeeze and the package in wheezy/sid. Assuming that's
> correct, please:
>
> - add an appropriate fixed version to #612924, which right now claims
> not
On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 21:35 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-09-03 at 00:07 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 08:03:16PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 14:32 -0400, Obey Arthur Liu wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 5:27 AM, Jona
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 21:26 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-10-31 at 09:06 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:47:53 +0400, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
> > > I wonder, is there any chance to get this trivial fix for Squeeze
> > > regression into Squeeze actually?
> >
>
On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 21:42 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-11-05 at 14:43 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 00:23 +0100, Chris Butler wrote:
> > > I've had a request in #645616, asking if I can update the libcgicc package
> > > to fix bug #600943 in squeeze. The
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hi,
here's the second half of cdbs binNMU requests to enable hardened
build flags now that cdbs has been fixed. I've validated with a
local rebuild that these packages have properly hardened
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 18:49 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 20:54:02 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 08:11:06PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > It'd probably be best to have kde sorted before the boost defaults
> > > change. Otherwise it soun
Le 06/04/2012 13:00, Joachim Breitner a écrit :
> I regularly check
> http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/haskell.html, it is a great
> tool. But I am confused why it says haskell-sfml-audio, -openal and
> -alut is bad on armel armhf mips mipsel ppc s390 s390x. According to the
> parameters,
On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 11:43 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Bernhard R. Link dixit:
> >The following patch moves he deletion behind dh_compress,
> >thus actually matching something.
>
> OK. Thanks!
fwiw, I assume s/\.gz//g on the affected lines would also have worked.
> Should I upload this, or
Bernhard R. Link dixit:
>The effect you see is usually not from a unclean chroot, but from a
>non-minimal chroot.
Non-minimal is unclean.
>It essentially means that the cvs package misses
>either code to mitigate this or misses a Build-Conflicts.
Possibly… the package from squeeze and older is
Hi Release team, especially Mehdi,
I regularly check
http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/haskell.html, it is a great
tool. But I am confused why it says haskell-sfml-audio, -openal and
-alut is bad on armel armhf mips mipsel ppc s390 s390x. According to the
parameters, this means that some
On Mar 30, 2012 08:30 "Niels Thykier" wrote:
> On 2012-03-30 00:16, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> > [...]
>
> Thanks. So one more time :).
>
> I propose we do an architecture qualification meeting over the Easter
> holidays. I have setup a doddle for it at [1].
>
> ~Niels
>
> [1] http://www.do
Your message dated Fri, 06 Apr 2012 11:35:09 +0200
with message-id <4f7eb8cd.60...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#667579: nmu: numexpr_2.0.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #667579,
regarding nmu: numexpr_2.0.1-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
On 06.04.2012 11:30, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 05/04/12 23:24, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> nmu empathy_3.2.2-1+b1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against cheese 3.4"
>>
>> nmu gnome-control-center_1:3.2.2-3 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against cheese
>> 3.4"
>>
>
> Scheduled.
Thanks
>> Please add a dw on libcheese-gtk-de
Your message dated Fri, 06 Apr 2012 11:30:43 +0200
with message-id <4f7eb7c3.3080...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#667691: nmu: rebuild empathy and gnome-control-center
for cheese 3.4
has caused the Debian Bug report #667691,
regarding nmu: rebuild empathy and gnome-control-center for chees
Hi,
Daniel Kahn Gillmor (05/04/2012):
> I recommend including this fix in the next squeeze point release if it's
> ok with the release team and the sks maintainers. A proposed debdiff is
> attached; i'm running the resulting package in production on
> keys.mayfirst.org, and it allows me to recon
28 matches
Mail list logo
