Processing changes file: phppgadmin_4.2.3-1.1squeeze2_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1sff4c-00042w...@franck.debian.org
On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 20:40 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 21:19 +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > diff -Nru phppgadmin-4.2.3/debian/changelog
> > phppgadmin-4.2.3/debian/changelog
> > --- phppgadmin-4.2.3/debian/changelog 2011-10-26 21:53:31.0
> > +0200
> > ++
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
gb numexpr_2.0.1-2 . sparc .
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (300, 'experimental'), (100,
'stable'
On Wed, 04 Apr 2012, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
>
> > clone 666004 -1
> Bug #666004 [kumofs] kumofs: Please remove packagaes for s390x and sparc --
> it blocks libtokyocabinet transition.
> Bug 666004 cloned as bug 667507
> Failed to clone
Processing changes file: tiff_3.9.4-5+squeeze4_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: tiff_3.9.4-5+squeeze4_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: tiff_3.9.4-5+squeeze4_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: tiff_3.9.4-5+squeeze4_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes fi
Hallo Julien,
Yes, a rebuild is prevented:
kumofs (0.4.13-2) unstable; urgency=low
[ Tobias Frost ]
* Add B-D on libmsgpack-ruby1.8 and libmsgpack-ruby1.9 to avoid building on
archs where those packages are not installable. (Closes: 620647)
coldtobi
Am Mittwoch, den 04.04.2012, 21:43 +
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 19:22, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 00:04:39 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>
>> > All the remaining packages are either RC-buggy (cmor #661283,
>> > pytables #661285 #661286 #661287) or not in testing (shogun,
>> > plplot).
>>
>> So time to look at remova
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 652650 with 665256 664943
Bug #652650 [release.debian.org] transition: imagemagick
652650 was blocked by: 663010
652650 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 652650: 665256 and 664943
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 652650 with 663010
Bug #652650 [release.debian.org] transition: imagemagick
652650 was not blocked by any bugs.
652650 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 652650: 663010
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me i
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 16:04:43 +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> Please remove kumofs for sparc and s390x.
>
> kumofs is currently uninstallable on s390x and sparc due to a missing
> run time dependency on those architectures. (See #620647 for details).
>
Does anything prevent the uninstallable pac
On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 21:19 +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Adam D. Barratt 2012-04-04
> <1333566352.16478.14.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
> > I'd like to see a full debdiff for final confirmation but based on the
> > commit link above it looks suitable; thanks for working on fixing th
On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 21:20 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 04/04/2012 09:00 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Yes. iceweasel 10.0.3esr-3 started building the iceweasel-l10n-all
> > binary package.
>
> No, 10.0~b6-1 did. (afaik)
Indeed, I was mislead by the presentation of the old binary package on
On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 21:17 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> This makes all perfect sense to me, and what I expected, if there were
> not for this entry:
>
> $ cat unstable/Packages_mips|grep-dctrl -FVersion 10.0.3esr-2|grep-dctrl
> -FPackage iceweasel-l10n-all
> Package: iceweasel-l10n-all
> Sou
On 04/04/2012 09:00 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 20:39 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
>> So clearly, 10.0.3esr-2 is the version of the iceweasel source on mips.
>
> Yes.
>
>> But why is then only a selection of its arch:all packages in the
>> Packages file for testing, and i
Re: Adam D. Barratt 2012-04-04
<1333566352.16478.14.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
> I'd like to see a full debdiff for final confirmation but based on the
> commit link above it looks suitable; thanks for working on fixing this
> issue in stable.
diff -Nru phppgadmin-4.2.3/debian/changelo
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 04.04.2012, 20:00 +0100 schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
> On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 20:39 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > So clearly, 10.0.3esr-2 is the version of the iceweasel source on
> > mips.
>
> Yes.
>
> > But why is then only a selection of its arch:all packages in the
> >
Hi,
On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 20:36 +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> would you consider this for a stable update?
[...]
> > phppgadmin 5.0.4 includes a fix for a possible XSS vulerability that
> > also affects 4.2.3-1.1squeeze1. There is no bug nor a CVE number, and
> > it is even unclear (to me) if thi
On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 20:39 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> So clearly, 10.0.3esr-2 is the version of the iceweasel source on mips.
Yes.
> But why is then only a selection of its arch:all packages in the
> Packages file for testing, and iceweasel-l10n-all is missing?
This is a non-sequitur. Al
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 08:17:29 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> Yes, libopng maintainers will upload libpng1.5 and libpng1.2 to
> unstable on this week.
>
What? At least I don't want another copy of libpng in wheezy without a
plan to get rid of the other one.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
D
Hi,
I’m trying to understand a strange situation here (found because it
causes SAT-Britney to suggest a strange transition):
$ cat testing/*Packages_mips|grep-dctrl -FVersion 10.0.3esr-2|grep-dctrl
-FPackage iceweasel-l10n-de
Package: iceweasel-l10n-de
Section: localization
Architecture: all
Sou
Hi,
would you consider this for a stable update?
- Forwarded message from Moritz Mühlenhoff -
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 20:18:48 +0200
From: Moritz Mühlenhoff
To: Christoph Berg
Cc: t...@security.debian.org
Subject: Re: phppgadmin 4.2.3-1.1squeeze1 possible XSS vulerability
On Tue, Mar 2
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 666004 -1
Bug #666004 [kumofs] kumofs: Please remove packagaes for s390x and sparc -- it
blocks libtokyocabinet transition.
Bug 666004 cloned as bug 667507
Failed to clone 666004: The following parameter was passed in the call to
Debbugs::
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 666004
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> block 666004 by -1
Failed to set blocking bugs of 666004: Invalid blocking bug(s):-1
Debbugs::Control::set_blocks('transcript', 'GLOB(0x20eaea0)',
'requester', 'Tobias Fro
clone 666004
block 666004 by -1
block 664078 by -1
block 664078 by 666004
reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
retitle -1 RM: kumofs on s390x/sparc (blocks transition of tokyocabinet)
severity -1 normal
thanks
Dear ftp-team,
Please remove kumofs for sparc and s390x.
kumofs is currently uninstallable on
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 02:45:18PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 04/04/12 14:15, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> >On 04/04/12 14:11, Niels Thykier wrote:
> >>
> >>This happens automatically when the last dependency of iceowl is
> >>gone from testing. In this case, that appears to be
> >>iceowl-l10n/1.0~b2-
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 02:11:30PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2012-04-04 13:42, Guido Günther wrote:
> > Hi,
> > iceowl (the standalone mozilla calendar sunbird) isn't maintained
> > upstream anymore. Please remove it from testing (it has already been
> > removed from unstable). The package w
On 04/04/12 14:15, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 04/04/12 14:11, Niels Thykier wrote:
This happens automatically when the last dependency of iceowl is
gone from testing. In this case, that appears to be
iceowl-l10n/1.0~b2-1 (see below).
My removal hint takes care of removing iceowl-l10n too, fwiw.
On 04/04/12 14:11, Niels Thykier wrote:
This happens automatically when the last dependency of iceowl is gone
from testing. In this case, that appears to be iceowl-l10n/1.0~b2-1
(see below).
My removal hint takes care of removing iceowl-l10n too, fwiw.
(It doesn't make sense to keep iceowl-l
On 04/04/12 13:42, Guido Günther wrote:
Hi,
iceowl (the standalone mozilla calendar sunbird) isn't maintained
upstream anymore. Please remove it from testing (it has already been
removed from unstable). The package will be maintained in experimental.
Removal hint added.
Kind regards,
--
Mehdi
On 2012-04-04 13:42, Guido Günther wrote:
> Hi,
> iceowl (the standalone mozilla calendar sunbird) isn't maintained
> upstream anymore. Please remove it from testing (it has already been
> removed from unstable). The package will be maintained in experimental.
> Cheers,
> -- Guido
>
>
Hi,
This
Hi,
iceowl (the standalone mozilla calendar sunbird) isn't maintained
upstream anymore. Please remove it from testing (it has already been
removed from unstable). The package will be maintained in experimental.
Cheers,
-- Guido
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
On 16/02/11 16:58, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
Thanks. I'll follow those steps. I'll contact -release later.
FWIW, libcegui-mk2-1 is no longer in testing. The transition is finished.
Next time, please file a "transition" bugreport against the
pseudo-package "release.debian.org" to have a transi
Your message dated Wed, 04 Apr 2012 11:50:40 +0200
with message-id <4f7c1970.3020...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#660785: transition: roaraudio
has caused the Debian Bug report #660785,
regarding transition: roaraudio
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Your message dated Wed, 04 Apr 2012 11:45:19 +0200
with message-id <4f7c182f.9020...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#663632: transition: geos
has caused the Debian Bug report #663632,
regarding transition: geos
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
GCC-4.7 packages are now available in testing and unstable; thanks to Lucas'
test rebuild, bug reports are now filed for these ~330 packages which fail to
build with the new version [1]. Hints how to address the vast majority of these
issues can be found at [2].
I'm planning to work on these
35 matches
Mail list logo
