On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 20:31 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 16:23 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> > On 03/24/2012 03:47 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > It looks okay to me, although I'd like to see a final debdiff before
> > > acking an upload; thanks. Any comment from t
Processing changes file: sysvinit_2.88dsf-13.1+squeeze1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openarena_0.8.5-5+squeeze2_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openarena_0.8.5-5+squeeze2_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openarena_0.8.5-5+squeeze2_armel.changes
ACC
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 20:22 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> #660717 was not introduced by tokycabinet, but due to the new sqlite3
> being in the archive when bogofilter was rebuilt. Hence the
> bogofilter-tokycabinet binary package builds+tests fine, but only the
> bogofilter-sqlite binary pack
Hi,
#660717 was not introduced by tokycabinet, but due to the new sqlite3
being in the archive when bogofilter was rebuilt. Hence the
bogofilter-tokycabinet binary package builds+tests fine, but only the
bogofilter-sqlite binary package FTBFS.
In principle I don't see why this should be holding
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 664078 with 660717
Bug #664078 [release.debian.org] transition: tokyocabinet
664078 was blocked by: 665363 620647 640602
664078 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 664078: 660717
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please con
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 664078 with 665363
Bug #664078 [release.debian.org] transition: tokyocabinet
664078 was blocked by: 620647 640602
664078 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 664078: 665363
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 20:39 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 01:12:32PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 15:54 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 03:42:03PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 15:37, Ad
Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 07:14:10AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > If I'm correct there is no more volatile at all.
>
> There's still the $codename-updates suite. I personally don't care if it's
> not
> deactivatable in d-i, but given that security updates are, it proba
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 07:14:10AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> If I'm correct there is no more volatile at all.
There's still the $codename-updates suite. I personally don't care if it's not
deactivatable in d-i, but given that security updates are, it probably makes
sense.
Kind regards,
P
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 01:12:32PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 15:54 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 03:42:03PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 15:37, Adam D. Barratt
> > > wrote:
> > > >> partman-nbd
> > > >
> > > >
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi release people!
While working on a few e-d-s fixes, I came across
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=641898
which in my eyes looks like a spu candidate, if at all, to compensa
Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 18:50:54 +0200
with message-id <20120327165054.gj22...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#665929: RM: factory-boy/1.1.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #665929,
regarding RM: factory-boy/1.1.2-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 20:54:02 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 08:11:06PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 13:21:19 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> >
> > > kdebase-workspace: #none [SOVER] cp: cannot stat
> > > `debian/tmp/usr/lib/libplasma_app
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Severity: normal
Please provide bin-NMUs for a coming apt ABI change (the apt version
in experimental will hit unstable as 0.9.0).
The version of apt in experimental includes multiarch support (among
other c
Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 11:47:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#665810: fixed in pywebdav 0.9.8-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #665810,
regarding transition: python-webdav
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
15 matches
Mail list logo