Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny2_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny2_alpha.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny2_hppa.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny2_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes fi
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 05:39:14 Hector Oron wrote:
> I would like to check if there is something holding RC fix in
> unstable for libosip2 package. Currently it is blocking some packages
> to build on armhf and s390x. If you dont have the time, would you have
> anything against unstable NMU?
Hector
Nicolas Bourdaud (17/02/2012):
> I am not sure but I think the parameters used on the transition page
> lead to several false positives (or false bads):
>
> the tail of the criteria for being good is:
> [...] | .depends ~ /libusb2debian/ | .depends ~ /libusbhid4debian/
> the tail of the criteria
Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny2_amd64.changes
Rejecting.
REJECT
Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny2_alpha.changes
Rejecting.
REJECT
Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny2_hppa.changes
Rejecting.
REJECT
Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny2_i386.ch
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 19:35:31 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> - 657669: cdo build-depends (indirectly) on the serial and mpi versions
> of hdf5, which aren't co-installable
> - 658307: minc, same issue as cdo
> - 658281: adios, same issue as cdo
>
I've pushed to
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitw
On 17.02.2012 17:06, Nicolas Bourdaud wrote:
I am not sure but I think the parameters used on the transition page
lead to several false positives (or false bads):
the tail of the criteria for being good is:
[...] | .depends ~ /libusb2debian/ | .depends ~ /libusbhid4debian/
the tail of the criter
Hi all,
I am not sure but I think the parameters used on the transition page
lead to several false positives (or false bads):
the tail of the criteria for being good is:
[...] | .depends ~ /libusb2debian/ | .depends ~ /libusbhid4debian/
the tail of the criteria for being bad is:
[...] | .depends
Your message dated Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:09:32 +
with message-id <53122ed228527bbedf474cffd7cf2...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#660211: nmu: kstars_4:4.7.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #660211,
regarding nmu: kstars_4:4.7.4-1
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hi,
please rebuild kstars in experimental to followup the libindi 0.9
transition (it had no rdeps in unstable/testing) I did few weeks ago.
nmu kstars_4:4.7.4-1 . ALL . -m "libindi 0.9 tran
9 matches
Mail list logo