On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 17:43 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> To try to work out of box for most situations we use
> /etc/debian_version information to detect from witch suite to
> grab udebs from but allow for overriden by auto-builders.
[...]
> - If /etc/buildd_target exists, use this for suite (t
Here are some more binnmus to get binary packages into armhf testing
that don't look like they will migrate from unstable any time soon.
nmu transfig hdf5 emacs23 libgtk2-perl audacious audacious-plugins
transfig vlc . armhf . testing . -m 'build for armhf testing'
nmu 3 netcdf . armhf . unsta
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 659657 ftp.debian.org
Bug #659657 [release.debian.org] RM: libgtkada2 -- RoM, superseded by libgtkada
Bug reassigned from package 'release.debian.org' to 'ftp.debian.org'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
reassign 659657 ftp.debian.org
thanks
On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 22:23 +0100, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
>
> Please remove the source package libgtkada2 and all its binary packages
> from unstable, it has been superseded by libgtkada and no longer has any
>
Processing changes file: eglibc_2.11.3-3_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: laptop-mode-tools_1.55-2_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Please remove the source package libgtkada2 and all its binary packages
from unstable, it has been superseded by libgtkada and no longer has any
reverse dependencies in unstable.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ..
On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 12:53 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 18:26 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> > On Sunday 05 February 2012 08:56 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > Thanks for the diff.
> > >
> > > I'm guessing there's been a copy-n-waste error. Diffing the old and new
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 658424 + pending
Bug #658424 [release.debian.org] pu: package eglibc/2.11.3-3
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
658424: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=6584
tag 658424 + pending
thanks
On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 20:38 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 11:09:49AM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > That's unfortunate, but I'm not sure we should let it block getting the
> > fix to stable users any further. Please go ahead with the upload.
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 11:09:49AM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> tag 658424 + confirmed squeeze
> thanks
>
> On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 22:48 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 09:45:12PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 23:11 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/02/12 13:44, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 19:21:02 +, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
>
>> I have upload a new version of libconfig to mentors, with the
>> following changelog:
>>
> this change to debian/rules looks weird:
>
>
El 12 de febrer de 2012 12:53, Adam D. Barratt
ha escrit:
> Looking at
> http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/freebsd-libs.html , there are
> several packages which build-depend on a -dev package produced by
> freebsd-libs but don't have a run-time dependency; what's the situation
> with the
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 19:21:02 +, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
> I have upload a new version of libconfig to mentors, with the
> following changelog:
>
this change to debian/rules looks weird:
- $(MAKE) install DESTDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian/tmp
+ $(MAKE) install DESTDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian
On Sat, 2012-02-04 at 20:07 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-02-04 at 20:00 +, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Anyhow, is there something I can do to help at this point? Just let me
> > know.
>
> Being prepared to handle any issues quickly when they come up, mainly.
Looking at
http://r
On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 18:26 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Sunday 05 February 2012 08:56 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Thanks for the diff.
> >
> > I'm guessing there's been a copy-n-waste error. Diffing the old and new
> > "enable" sections looks wrong:
>
> Thanks Adam, again, for catchi
15 matches
Mail list logo