Processed: unblock 634797 with 631822

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unblock 634797 with 631822 Bug #634797 [release.debian.org] opencv 2.3 transition Was blocked by: 631822 651872 654619 634796 652759 653799 Removed blocking bug(s) of 634797: 631822 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 659409 1.14-1 Bug #659409 [veusz] veusz: uses feature removed from numpy 1.6 Bug Marked as fixed in versions veusz/1.14-1. > block 658289 by 659409 Bug #658289 [release.debian.org] transition: python-numpy Was blocked by: 659403 Added blocki

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 658289 by 659403 Bug #658289 [release.debian.org] transition: python-numpy Was not blocked by any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 658289: 659403 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 658289: http://

Re: please binnmu pykde4 on armhf and s390x with a version suffix of -b2

On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 10:53 +, peter green wrote: > python-qt4 declares a breaks on python-kde4 (<= 4:4.6.80-3+b1) due to > old builds being incompatible with new versions of python-qt4. > > This is fine on most architectures but armhf and s390x still have > non-binnmu versions of python-kde

Re: getting Debian Edu related updates into squeeze before next point release (was Re: gosa update for squeeze-proposed-updates)

Hi, On Donnerstag, 9. Februar 2012, Mike Gabriel wrote: > Adam, thanks a lot of this explicit statement. indeed, thanks to all involved fixing these issues in squeeze! > This is very probably the way to go. Petter, Holger, what do you > think? Is it possible to draw packages from squeeze-propos

Processed: block 654417 with 654283

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 654417 with 654283 Bug #654417 [release.debian.org] transition: glew Was blocked by: 655048 Added blocking bug(s) of 654417: 654283 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 654417: http://bugs.debian.

Processed: block 654417 with 655048

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 654417 with 655048 Bug #654417 [release.debian.org] transition: glew Was not blocked by any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 654417: 655048 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 654417: http://bugs.d

Processed: block 653919 with 654417

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 653919 with 654417 Bug #653919 [release.debian.org] transition: KDE SC 4.7 Was blocked by: 653195 634797 Added blocking bug(s) of 653919: 654417 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 653919: http:/

Bug#654417: transition: glew

On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > Sounds good so far - do you know if there has been any API changes? It's API compatible. >  However, just to be clear - if there are any FTBFS issues due to the > -dev renaming, I am expecting that the two of you will be NMU'ing > affected p