Hi,
As previously mentioned, all known build failures have patches in the
BTS. This weekend, I ran a new rebuild of 241 packages that
build-depend on some part of boost-defaults. No new boost-related
failures were found.
I have uploaded six NMUs to delayed/10. There are only
three packages lef
Your message dated Sun, 29 Jan 2012 21:17:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#657758: fixed in policykit-1 0.96-4+squeeze2
has caused the Debian Bug report #657758,
regarding squeeze: Misses policykit-1 DSA 2319-1 security update from 2011-10-08
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Processing changes file: policykit-1_0.96-4+squeeze2_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rrc7u-000106...@franck.debian.org
On Sun, 2012-01-29 at 18:33 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> On 29.01.2012 12:53, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 10:41:05PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >> Would the stable release team be ok with a no-changes upload of
> >> 0.96-4+squeeze1 to stable (as 0.96-4+squeeze2)?
> >
> > Ye
Hello,
I've rebuilt all the remaining packages (excluding ruby-rmagick and
python-magick, that were already checked) against the version of
imagemagick in experimental, and everything went fine, excepted for
cimg, that fails at the build-dep level:
[...]
The following packages have unmet depe
I just NMUed a number of packages with build-dependencies on
libjpeg62-dev, which should get us closer to a full move to libjpeg8 for
wheezy. These packages are in DELAYED/7:
- aaphoto
- ctwm
- driftnet
- exrtools
- flam3
- gegl
- gpicview
- italc
- jp2a
- jpegpixi
- libwebp
- minidlna
- mrxvt
-
On 29.01.2012 12:53, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 10:41:05PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Would the stable release team be ok with a no-changes upload of
>> 0.96-4+squeeze1 to stable (as 0.96-4+squeeze2)?
>
> Yes.
Uploaded.
Please note that in absence of a new .orig on secur
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:18:34 +0900, HIGUCHI Daisuke (VDR dai) wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> nmu gnet_2.0.8-2.1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against glib2.0 for gnet-2.0.pc
> multiarch path."
>
> please re
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:33:57 +0900, HIGUCHI Daisuke (VDR dai) wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> nmu vdk2_2.4.0-5.2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against glib2.0 for vdk-config-2
> multiarch path (Closes: #65640
[ Please CC me, not subscribed! ]
Hi!
We have an incoming soname bump in freebsd-libs (libusb, libusbhid,
libcam and libsbuf). Should we wait until the current transition is
over, or upload to unstable with the new sonames as soon as possible?
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de
Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> [please cc me on responses; I am not subscribed to debian-release]
>
> I have uploaded tiff3_3.9.5-3 with libtiff4, libtiff4-dev, and
> libtiffxx0c2 and tiff_4.0.0-1 with libtiff5, libtiff-dev, libtiffxx5,
> libtiff-tools, libtiff-doc, and libtiff-opengl to experimental as
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 10:41:05PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Would the stable release team be ok with a no-changes upload of
> 0.96-4+squeeze1 to stable (as 0.96-4+squeeze2)?
Yes. Please note that in absence of a new .orig on security-master this would
need to be done on every further securit
12 matches
Mail list logo
