On 01/09/2012 04:06 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Something odd appears to have happened to CVE-2011-4602.patch; it looks
like a diff of a brokenly wrapped diff. For instance: (sic)
Strange, but it actually doesn't affect the patch, and the actual
changes are correct. I'll remove the extra "comm
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 655188 src:avahi
Bug #655188 [release.debian.org] nmu: avahi_0.6.30-5 for hardening
Bug reassigned from package 'release.debian.org' to 'src:avahi'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
655188:
reassign 655188 src:avahi
thanks
On 09.01.2012 20:07, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Michael Biebl , 2012-01-09, 08:10:
>> Currently no upload of avahi is planned,
>
> How about fixing #637552?
What a mess. I guess I completely missed that. Thanks for pointing me at
it again.
I'll make a sourceful upload
Processing changes file: cacti_0.8.7g-1+squeeze1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rknwa-00026d...@franck.debian.org
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 09:09:50PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> tag 655158 + squeeze confirmed
> thanks
>
> On Sun, 2012-01-08 at 22:25 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Debian Squeeze is currently not installable on Power 7 based IBM
> > pSeries, unless the Power 6 compatibility mode is enable
Processing changes file: cacti_0.8.7b-2.1+lenny4_i386.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rkni6-yp...@franck.debian.org
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 01:14 +0400, Anton Olkhovik wrote:
> There is a critical bug in libjson-glib-1.0-0 package in Squeeze:
> doubles serialization does not works. As a result, some applications
> can't operate properly (e.g. can't save their config files). It is a
> known problem and it was fixed
Hello,
There is a critical bug in libjson-glib-1.0-0 package in Squeeze: doubles
serialization does not works. As a result, some applications can't operate
properly (e.g. can't save their config files). It is a known problem and it
was fixed in the upstream source repo almost 2 year ago. The patch
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 655158 + squeeze confirmed
Bug #655158 [release.debian.org] pu: base-installer & libdebian-installer:
Power 7 support
Added tag(s) squeeze and confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
655158
tag 655158 + squeeze confirmed
thanks
On Sun, 2012-01-08 at 22:25 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Debian Squeeze is currently not installable on Power 7 based IBM
> pSeries, unless the Power 6 compatibility mode is enabled. Latest
> version of QEMU is also emulating a Power 7 pSeries, but doesn't
On Sun, 2012-01-08 at 19:40 -0500, Ari Pollak wrote:
> The security team asked me to prepare an update for squeeze that
> includes fixes for the outstanding minor security issues (all remote
> crashers with no remote code execution). That diff is attached.
Something odd appears to have happened to
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 20:17:57 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Depends if we're happy with removing petsc, getdp, illuminator, slepc,
> plplot, gnudatalanguage, cl-plplot and pygpiv from testing. Are we?
>
So apparently nobody cares...
Go ahead with hdf5 1.8.8 in sid then, and I'll know who to
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
> Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
>
> > Interesting question. I was indeed convinced that the patch made its
> > way to 3.6 but it apparently didn't. Upstream bug tracker doesn't say
> > a word about 3.6 or about the patch not being r
Processing changes file:
openoffice.org_2.4.1+dfsg-1+lenny12_source+i386+amd64+all.changes
Rejecting.
REJECT
Processing changes file: openoffice.org_2.4.1+dfsg-1+lenny12_armel.changes
Rejecting.
REJECT
Processing changes file: openoffice.org_2.4.1+dfsg-1+lenny12_ia64.changes
Rejecting.
RE
Processing changes file:
openoffice.org_3.2.1-11+squeeze4_source+i386+amd64+armel+all.changes
Rejecting.
REJECT
Processing changes file: openoffice.org_3.2.1-11+squeeze4_ia64.changes
Rejecting.
REJECT
Processing changes file: openoffice.org_3.2.1-11+squeeze4_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
Rejecting.
Processing changes file: super_3.30.0-3+squeeze1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: super_3.30.0-3+squeeze1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: super_3.30.0-3+squeeze1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: super_3.30.0-3+squeeze1_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing ch
* Michael Biebl , 2012-01-09, 08:10:
Currently no upload of avahi is planned,
How about fixing #637552?
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debia
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 655188 wishlist
Bug #655188 [release.debian.org] Needs rebuild for hardened build flags
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'important'
> retitle 655188 nmu: avahi_0.6.30-5 for hardening
Bug #655188 [release.debian.org] Needs rebuild for har
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 13:52:38 +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Rhonda brought to my attention that when opening the bugs against
> packages using the build system "waf" in non-dfsg conform [1] manner we
> forgot about the stable release, and asked me to get in contact with the
Hi Joachim.
On 08/01/2012 18:04, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> geogebra-kde seems to prevent the new geogebra version from entering
> testing:
> http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=geogebra
>
> The reason seems to be that geogebra bumped its Recommends on
> icedtea-plugin to a Depe
On lun., 2012-01-09 at 13:52 +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> Rhonda brought to my attention that when opening the bugs against
> packages using the build system "waf" in non-dfsg conform [1] manner we
> forgot about the stable release, and asked me to get in contact with the
> SRMs about
* Alexander Reichle-Schmehl [120109 13:52]:
> 1: See http://bugs.debian.org/?tag=waf-unpack;users=ftpmas...@debian.org
Sorry, that should have been
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=waf-unpack;users=ftpmas...@debian.org
Best Regards,
Alexander
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
Hi!
Rhonda brought to my attention that when opening the bugs against
packages using the build system "waf" in non-dfsg conform [1] manner we
forgot about the stable release, and asked me to get in contact with the
SRMs about that.
Regarding the stable release, we don't think it's necessary to ge
On Mon, 09, Jan, 2012 at 10:10:57AM +0100, Reinhard Tartler spoke thus..
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:00 PM, peter green wrote:
> > armhf has now pretty much cleared the needs-build queue (the only things
> > left are non-free stuff and recently added stuff) and has built arround 89%
> > of the arc
Sumināti!
Patīk iekārojami izskatīties un būt stilīgam personāžam, bet izved no
pacietības tas, ka tev jātērējās kā Sorosam?
Second Hand šmotkas arī tā pa īstam neiet pie sirds?
Oho, bet viss skaidrs: vai nu teleportēties uz Berlīni iepirkšanās tūrē, vai
arī.. apskati to:
http://a-komfort.
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:00 PM, peter green wrote:
> armhf has now pretty much cleared the needs-build queue (the only things
> left are non-free stuff and recently added stuff) and has built arround 89%
> of the archive (placing it between kfreebsd and ia64) with about 99.5% up to
> date (placin
26 matches
Mail list logo
