Re: stable-proposed-updates: considering cpufrequtils

2011-12-02 Thread Mattia Dongili
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 03:12:04PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 13:20 +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote: ... > > cpufrequtils (007-2+squeeze1) stable; urgency=low > > The version for stable needs to be lower than the version in testing - > convention would be -1+squeeze1 (or -2~

Re: Bugs in stable c-ares package

2011-12-02 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 11/22/11 10:24 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2011-11-06 at 16:17 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> On Sat, 2011-11-05 at 20:51 +0100, Gregor Jasny wrote: >>> >>> Uploaded to mentors for reviewing and testing: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/c-ares/c-ares_1.7.3-1squeeze

Re: Updating stable Cherokee 1.0.8-5 to avoid a predictable password generation

2011-12-02 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 07:58:19 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote: Adam D. Barratt dijo [Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 06:26:47AM +]: On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 18:47 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Ok - Uploaded to the regular queue. [...] Heh... Noticed that my upload was rejected (I got an explicit mail). Well, I up

Re: lusca - should it be in Debian?

2011-12-02 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 05:36:23AM +0100, Luigi Gangitano wrote: >Il giorno 01/dic/2011, alle ore 19:18, Steve McIntyre ha scritto: >> Hi Luigi, >> >> I'm working through the list of build failures for armhf while we >> bring up the new architecture, and I've just got to lusca. I'm >> concerned ab