NEW changes in proposedupdates

2011-10-30 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: phpldapadmin_1.2.0.5-2+squeeze1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: xorg-server_1.7.7-14_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: module-init-tools_3.12-2_i386.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Re: [SRM] Uploading new upstream stable version to Squeeze?

2011-10-30 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 05:36:27PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2011-09-10 at 22:53 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > The status is that glibc 2.11.4 will be released when Debian feels it > > is ready, as we are the main testers here. I am planning to do some more > > testing of the curre

Bugs in stable c-ares package

2011-10-30 Thread Gregor Jasny
Hello, I have a question regarding the c-ares package (a library to query the DNS) bug #607438. The bug report has a patch attached. But browsing the upstream repository shows many fixes since v1.7.3. How should I go on here? I see three options: 1) Update stable version with the single patc

Re: 3.x kernels fix for the stable module-init-tools

2011-10-30 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2011-10-30 at 03:30 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > Please approve the updated module-init-tools package, the trivial patch > comes from upstream and has been in testing for months. Whilst it would have been appreciated if you'd mailed before uploading, the patch looks obvious enough. Flagge

Re: [SRM] Uploading new upstream stable version to Squeeze?

2011-10-30 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2011-09-10 at 22:53 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > The status is that glibc 2.11.4 will be released when Debian feels it > is ready, as we are the main testers here. I am planning to do some more > testing of the current SVN on more machines, and everything seems fine > around the release o

Processed: Re: Bug#646156: pu: package xorg-server/2:1.7.7-14

2011-10-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 646156 + pending Bug #646156 [release.debian.org] pu: package xorg-server/2:1.7.7-14 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 646156: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?b

Bug#646156: pu: package xorg-server/2:1.7.7-14

2011-10-30 Thread Adam D. Barratt
tag 646156 + pending thanks On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 15:25 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > tag 646156 + confirmed squeeze > thanks > > On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 21:12 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > there were a couple of CVEs for X recently, that Moritz suggested we > > fixed through p-u. And an inpu

Re: Multiarch support in dpkg — really in time for wheezy?

2011-10-30 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Sat, 29 Oct 2011, Michael Gilbert wrote: >> You could also make a case from a terminological perspective as well. >> Unstable is where development in Debian is supposed to happen, so it's >> perfectly acceptable to upload unfinished/unsta

Re: Multiarch support in dpkg — really in time for wheezy?

2011-10-30 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, I can't let this without answer. On Sat, 29 Oct 2011, Michael Gilbert wrote: > You could also make a case from a terminological perspective as well. > Unstable is where development in Debian is supposed to happen, so it's > perfectly acceptable to upload unfinished/unstable changes. No, sorr