3.x kernels fix for the stable module-init-tools

2011-10-29 Thread Marco d'Itri
Please approve the updated module-init-tools package, the trivial patch comes from upstream and has been in testing for months. diff -u module-init-tools-3.12/debian/changelog module-init-tools-3.12/debian/changelog --- module-init-tools-3.12/debian/changelog +++ module-init-tools-3.12/debian/cha

Re: [SRM] shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} update for stable?

2011-10-29 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:16:00PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > > > I'd like to see debdiffs before a final ACK, but I'd be inclined to say > > yes based on the information provided so far. > > > OK. I will prepare the uploads and send the debdiffs for final approval > prior to uploading

NEW changes in oldproposedupdates

2011-10-29 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: python-django_1.0.2-1+lenny3_i386.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rkexs-00048t...@franck.debian.org

NEW changes in proposedupdates

2011-10-29 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: nfs-utils_1.2.2-4squeeze1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: python-django_1.2.3-3+squeeze2_i386.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#646156: pu: package xorg-server/2:1.7.7-14

2011-10-29 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 13:38:47 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: >> > +commit 03ff880e8bf20cdecaf27f03391ea31545ecc22c >> > +Author: Matthieu Herrb >> > +Date:   Mon Oct 17 22:27:35 2

Bug#646156: pu: package xorg-server/2:1.7.7-14

2011-10-29 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 13:38:47 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: > > +commit 03ff880e8bf20cdecaf27f03391ea31545ecc22c > > +Author: Matthieu Herrb > > +Date:   Mon Oct 17 22:27:35 2011 +0200 > > + > > +    Fix CVE-2011-4029: File permission ch

Re: Multiarch support in dpkg — really in time for wheezy?

2011-10-29 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > What worries me is that there is multi-arch work in dpkg, work that has > its origins in Debian. That work is ready enough to be deployed in > popular Debian derivatives such as Ubuntu, but is not in Debian proper > yet. That is bad for D

Bug#646156: pu: package xorg-server/2:1.7.7-14

2011-10-29 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: > +commit 03ff880e8bf20cdecaf27f03391ea31545ecc22c > +Author: Matthieu Herrb > +Date:   Mon Oct 17 22:27:35 2011 +0200 > + > +    Fix CVE-2011-4029: File permission change vulnerability. > + > +    Use fchmod() to change permissions of the loc

ben, edos-debcheck, arch:all

2011-10-29 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi (especially) Mehdi, I’m wondering why http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/haskell.html lists agda as bad, and I assume that ben considers it a problem if an arch:all package is uninstallable on an architecture, even though the arch:any packages there never have been built. Is that a bug

Re: [SRM] shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} update for stable?

2011-10-29 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 03:12:06PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2011-10-22 at 16:35 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > As a result of #646112, it has come to my attention that I made a > > packaging error in the shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} packages that released > > with Squeeze. Incid

Processed: Re: Bug#646156: pu: package xorg-server/2:1.7.7-14

2011-10-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 646156 + confirmed squeeze Bug #646156 [release.debian.org] pu: package xorg-server/2:1.7.7-14 Added tag(s) squeeze and confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 646156: http://bugs.debian.org

Bug#646156: pu: package xorg-server/2:1.7.7-14

2011-10-29 Thread Adam D. Barratt
tag 646156 + confirmed squeeze thanks On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 21:12 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > there were a couple of CVEs for X recently, that Moritz suggested we > fixed through p-u. And an input fix to use 64bit arithmetic to avoid > overflows with high resolution devices, that's been sittin

Re: Bug#622146: nfs-common: compatibility between squeeze and sid broken

2011-10-29 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 09:05 +0200, Luk Claes wrote: [...] > >>> "Adam" == Adam D Barratt writes: > >> > >> > >> Adam> The krb5 package was uploaded and I've (somewhat belatedly) > >> Adam> marked it for acceptance at the next dinstall. What's the > >> Adam> status of the nfs-utils

Re: [SRM] shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} update for stable?

2011-10-29 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2011-10-22 at 16:35 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > As a result of #646112, it has come to my attention that I made a > packaging error in the shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} packages that released > with Squeeze. Incidentally, the problem also affects shorewall-lite and > shorewall6-lite in

Re: Proposed stable update: recoll

2011-10-29 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2011-10-27 at 17:21 +0530, Kartik Mistry wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Adam D. Barratt > wrote: > > The version information for #614760 suggests that it also affects > > testing and unstable currently. If that's not correct, please mark it > > as closed in an appropriate versi

Re: Multiarch support in dpkg — really in time for wheezy?

2011-10-29 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 12:25:31PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 11:23:27 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > Given this, and if Guillem hasn't responded with a review requiring > > further work on the branch by sunday, I will upload dpkg 1.16.2 to > > experimental on sunday (Oc

Bug#630201: Bug#570805: [kfreebsd-*] please rebuild elfutils/sid, ignoring the 2 known testsuite failures (Re: transition: liblzma 5)

2011-10-29 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 11:38:18AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 11:07:42AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 02:12:25 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > > > > Julien Cristau wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:01:41 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: >

Bug#630201: [kfreebsd-*] please rebuild elfutils/sid, ignoring the 2 known testsuite failures (Re: transition: liblzma 5)

2011-10-29 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 11:07:42AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 02:12:25 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > > Julien Cristau wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:01:41 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > > >>> libdw1 (DWARF parser for elfutils) > > >> > > >> FTBFS on k

Bug#630201: [kfreebsd-*] please rebuild elfutils/sid, ignoring the 2 known testsuite failures (Re: transition: liblzma 5)

2011-10-29 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 02:12:25 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:01:41 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > >>> libdw1 (DWARF parser for elfutils) > >> > >> FTBFS on kfreebsd, needs a bug filed. > > > > Apparently that's #570805 (thanks, Jakub). >

Bug#630201: [kfreebsd-*] please rebuild elfutils/sid, ignoring the 2 known testsuite failures (Re: transition: liblzma 5)

2011-10-29 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Julien Cristau wrote: > On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:01:41 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: >>> libdw1 (DWARF parser for elfutils) >> >> FTBFS on kfreebsd, needs a bug filed. > > Apparently that's #570805 (thanks, Jakub). That's a pair of testsuite failures due to a kernel bug and not a regression in