2011/10/6 Philipp Kern :
> That said, this needs to be fixed, and we're all not very happy, given
> the fact that we actually did ask before if something changes in the
> udeb output.
I have to say in my defense that I did check for changes in udeb
output. However these changes don't happen on my
2011/10/6 Adam D. Barratt :
> test -e ./tmp/cdrom/tree/boot/zfs || rmdir ./tmp/cdrom/tree/boot/
> rmdir: failed to remove `./tmp/cdrom/tree/boot/': Directory not empty
> [...]
> $ debdiff kernel-image-8.1-1-486-di_0.6_kfreebsd-i386.udeb
> kernel-image-8.1-1-486-di_0.6+b1_kfreebsd-i386.udeb
> [...]
Processing changes file: quagga_0.99.10-1lenny6_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: quagga_0.99.10-1lenny6_alpha.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: quagga_0.99.10-1lenny6_arm.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: quagga_0.99.10-1lenny6_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing change
Processing changes file: php5_5.3.3-7+squeeze2_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: php5_5.3.3-7+squeeze2_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: php5_5.3.3-7+squeeze2_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: php5_5.3.3-7+squeeze2_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes fi
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 11:20:00PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> [tl,dr; these changes broke d-i in stable]
I think in the worst case we can just keep the current (as in
non-point release version) of d-i on kfreebsd-* for the next point
release and don't update to the binNMU. It's actually from
[tl,dr; these changes broke d-i in stable]
On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 00:25 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> 2011/9/27 Adam D. Barratt :
> >> > - Does this affect which modules end up in the udebs?
> >
> > It looks like this was missed in the original follow-up. As a related
> > query, has a test build o
It should be fixed in unstable by actually supporting the new enctypes.
While ncice, that rather misses the point.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/ts
Your message dated Wed, 5 Oct 2011 22:45:31 +0200
with message-id <20111005204531.gd2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#644372: nmu: gnome-shell_3.0.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #644372,
regarding nmu: gnome-shell_3.0.2-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Processing changes file: opensaml2_2.3-2+squeeze1_i386.changes
Rejecting.
REJECT
Processing changes file: opensaml2_2.3-2+squeeze1_armel.changes
Rejecting.
REJECT
Processing changes file: opensaml2_2.3-2+squeeze1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
Rejecting.
REJECT
Processing changes file: opensaml2_2
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Please consider binNMUing gnome-shell in experimental (if that's something
the release team do):
nmu gnome-shell_3.0.2-3 . ALL . -m "rebuild against libgjs0-libmozjs7d
1.29.0-2+b1"
Thanks,
Hello,
My last update of dokuwiki/lenny, which fixed a security flaw and was
released with Lenny 5.0.9, unfortunately introduced a quite important
regression, breaking any wiki page containing external links. I should
have detected it, but it appears that I did not test external links (and
I reall
Processing changes file: typo3-src_4.2.5-1+lenny9_i386.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rbmso-0007rc...@franck.debian.org
Processing changes file: linux-kernel-di-mipsel-2.6_1.31+squeeze5_multi.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6_1.76+squeeze5_multi.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.99+squeeze5_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux-ker
13 matches
Mail list logo
