Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1

2011-09-30 Thread Robert Millan
2011/9/27 Adam D. Barratt : >> > - Does this affect which modules end up in the udebs? > > It looks like this was missed in the original follow-up.  As a related > query, has a test build of kfreebsd-kernel-di-* been performed in order > to find out whether any additional modules get pulled in to t

NEW changes in proposedupdates

2011-09-30 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.76+squeeze4_multi.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6_1.64+squeeze4_multi.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6_0.59+squeeze4_multi.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: linux-kerne

Bug#637111: pu: package freebsd-libs/8.1-6

2011-09-30 Thread Robert Millan
2011/9/28 Adam D. Barratt : > In that case, please go ahead. (Preferably sooner rather than later, as > both libraries appear to be in the d-i initrd). Uploaded. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con

Processed: retitle 614888 to RM: pixelpost/lenny -- RoQA; unmaintained, multiple security issues

2011-09-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 614888 RM: pixelpost/lenny -- RoQA; unmaintained, multiple security > issues Bug #614888 [release.debian.org] RM: pixelpost/lenny -- RoQA Changed Bug title to 'RM: pixelpost/lenny -- RoQA; unmaintained, multiple security issues' from 'RM

Processed: retitle 614888 to RM: pixelpost/lenny -- RoQA

2011-09-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 614888 RM: pixelpost/lenny -- RoQA Bug #614888 [release.debian.org] RM: pixelpost/lenny -- RoQA; unused, unmaintained, multiple security issues Changed Bug title to 'RM: pixelpost/lenny -- RoQA' from 'RM: pixelpost/lenny -- RoQA; unused,

Re: [SRM] updating ia32-libs for stable

2011-09-30 Thread Philipp Kern
Hi, On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 04:49:05PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > I realise I'm late to the party, but I didn't have (make?) time > before. I added this as an item on the point release checklist now. > As in earlier stable updates I propose to update the packages contained in > ia32-libs to

Re: [SRM] updating ia32-libs for stable

2011-09-30 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Cyril Brulebois (30/09/2011): > Thijs Kinkhorst (30/09/2011): > > For oldstable it's probably too late already, but let me know if an update > > could still make it. > > The deadline was last weekend AFAICT; so no. > > > Let me know if there's still time to update this in stable and if so when

Re: [SRM] updating ia32-libs for stable

2011-09-30 Thread Cyril Brulebois
(Re-ordering questions.) Thijs Kinkhorst (30/09/2011): > For oldstable it's probably too late already, but let me know if an update > could still make it. The deadline was last weekend AFAICT; so no. > Let me know if there's still time to update this in stable and if so when > you need the pack

[SRM] updating ia32-libs for stable

2011-09-30 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Hi, I realise I'm late to the party, but I didn't have (make?) time before. As in earlier stable updates I propose to update the packages contained in ia32-libs to their most up to date versions. The changelog entries for ia32-libs and ia32-libs-gtk are attached. ia32-libs-core doesn't have chang

Processed: block 622279 with 643848, block 643848 with 643857

2011-09-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # FTBFS: wsjt > block 622279 with 643848 Bug #622279 [release.debian.org] transition: python-defaults (switching default: 2.6 -> 2.7) Was blocked by: 628860 629085 643458 628243 643806 625676 633457 622966 623587 629087 623578 625171 606363 6318