Re: Stable update for python-recaptcha

2011-09-04 Thread Vincent Bernat
OoO Pendant le repas du dimanche 04 septembre 2011, vers 19:56, "Adam D. Barratt" disait : >> I did not get an answer on this. Is it OK to upload to >> stable-proposed-updates? > I managed to miss it the first time; in future, if you could file such > requests in the BTS (reportbug will gene

Bug#640404: transition: network-manager

2011-09-04 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 05.09.2011 02:53, schrieb Ricardo Mones: > On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 22:51:32 +0200 > Michael Biebl wrote: > >> Am 04.09.2011 22:37, schrieb Michael Biebl: >> >>> - Packages which need to be binNMUed: >>> claws-mail >> The reason are the new online states in the D-Bus API which are >> conditionally

Re: Bug#640404: transition: network-manager

2011-09-04 Thread Ricardo Mones
On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 22:51:32 +0200 Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 04.09.2011 22:37, schrieb Michael Biebl: > > > - Packages which need to be binNMUed: > > claws-mail > > evolution > > kdebase-runtime > > libsocialweb > > packagekit > > pidgin > > In case anyone wonders why those packages need to be

Re: Removal of linux-modules-di-* packages

2011-09-04 Thread Philipp Kern
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 01:53:24PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 09:58, Philipp Kern wrote: > > can the linux-modules-di-* packages be removed from unstable?  They seem to > > be > > built against 2.6.30 anyway and hence not useful.  If so I can file the RM > > bugs. > Y

Bug#640404: transition: network-manager

2011-09-04 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 04.09.2011 22:37, schrieb Michael Biebl: > - Packages which need to be binNMUed: > claws-mail > evolution > kdebase-runtime > libsocialweb > packagekit > pidgin In case anyone wonders why those packages need to be binNMUed even if they don't link against libnm-glib2 or libnm-util1. The reason

Bug#640404: transition: network-manager

2011-09-04 Thread Michael Biebl
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi, as part of the ongoing GNOME 3 transitions I'd like to start the network-manager 0.9 transition soon, as it will be a dependency of gnome-control-center 3.0. network-manager 0.9.0-1

NEW changes in proposedupdates

2011-09-04 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: kde4libs_4.4.5-2+squeeze3_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: krb5_1.8.3+dfsg-4squeeze2_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: lintian_2.4.3+squeeze1_i386.changes Rejecting. REJECT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org

Bug#640386: marked as done (RM: trac-ja-resource/0.11.5.ja1-1)

2011-09-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 4 Sep 2011 21:05:48 +0200 with message-id <20110904190548.gl5...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr> and subject line Re: Bug#640386: RM: trac-ja-resource/0.11.5.ja1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #640386, regarding RM: trac-ja-resource/0.11.5.ja1-1 to be marked as done. This means

Bug#640386: RM: trac-ja-resource/0.11.5.ja1-1

2011-09-04 Thread Arthur de Jong
Subject: RM: trac-ja-resource/0.11.5.ja1-1 Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: trac-ja-resou...@packages.debian.org Dear release team, Please consider removing trac-ja-resource from testing to allow trac to migrate.

Re: Stable update for python-recaptcha

2011-09-04 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2011-09-04 at 19:43 +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote: > OoO En ce doux début de matinée du mercredi 31 août 2011, vers 08:52, je > disais: > I did not get an answer on this. Is it OK to upload to > stable-proposed-updates? I managed to miss it the first time; in future, if you could file such

Re: Stable update for python-recaptcha

2011-09-04 Thread Vincent Bernat
OoO En ce doux début de matinée du mercredi 31 août 2011, vers 08:52, je disais: > python-recaptcha uses a webservice whose URL have changed. A fixed > version has been uploaded to sid but since the package in stable is not > usable anymore because of this change, I have prepared an upl

Re: [SRM] Uploading new upstream stable version to Squeeze?

2011-09-04 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 10:04:42PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 23:30 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 04:30:41PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > On Sat, 2011-08-13 at 14:47 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:48:51AM

Re: Point release schedule

2011-09-04 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 06:14:50PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: >Hi, > >so apparently September is a very bad month to get CDs done. I'm hereby >proposing the following with the hope that we can do it that way: > > * Lenny: October 1st > * Squeeze: October 8th > >Can we do that, pretty please? :)

Point release schedule

2011-09-04 Thread Philipp Kern
Hi, so apparently September is a very bad month to get CDs done. I'm hereby proposing the following with the hope that we can do it that way: * Lenny: October 1st * Squeeze: October 8th Can we do that, pretty please? :) Any objections? Kind regards, Philipp Kern -- .''`. Philipp Kern

Bug#639642: pu: package xpdf/3.02-12squeeze1 and xpdf/3.02-1.4+lenny4

2011-09-04 Thread Michael Gilbert
Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Thanks for working on this. As a general comment, if you're submitting > patches for both stable and oldstable please do so using two different > bugs; otherwise we can't track the acceptance and release status in a > sane way. Ok, I'll do that in the future. > I'd be

Bug#637384: pu: package lintian/2.4.3+squeeze1

2011-09-04 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 21:07 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > .gitignore|7 - > t/tests/shared-libs-la-files/debian/_python_module.la | 12 - > t/tests/shared-libs-la-files/debian/kio_locate.la | 15 --- > t/tests/shared-lib

Re: nfs-common: compatibility between squeeze and sid broken

2011-09-04 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 19:09 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 01:34:34AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > I've attached the patches for both packages to this mail. Phil, is it ok > > for these to be uploaded to stable-proposed-updates? This fixes a bug that > > makes squeeze ke

Bug#637803: pu: package kde4libs/4:4.4.5-2+squeeze3

2011-09-04 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 18:45 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > tags 637803 + squeeze pending Hmmm, that should have been confirmed, not pending, at that point. Ah well. > Thanks; please feel free to go ahead with the upload. For the record, the upload happened and I've marked it for acceptance at t

Re: Oracle's Java package status

2011-09-04 Thread Camaleón
On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 13:54:17 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: > On 2011-09-04 12:22, Camaleón wrote: >> I sent this message to "debian-user" mailing list but as I got no >> feeback from there I try now here, if this is not the proper list, >> please tell. >> >> > Hi, > > I am thinking d-java@l.d.o

Re: Oracle's Java package status

2011-09-04 Thread Damien Raude-Morvan
Le dimanche 04 septembre 2011 13:54:17, Niels Thykier a écrit : > As I recall, java-common used to have some templates for creating a > deb-package to trick APT into thinking that Java was installed. I > suppose those could be restored - feel free to file a wishlist bug > against java-common for t

Re: Oracle's Java package status

2011-09-04 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2011-09-04 12:22, Camaleón wrote: > Hello, > > I sent this message to "debian-user" mailing list but as I got no feeback > from there I try now here, if this is not the proper list, please tell. > Hi, I am thinking d-java@l.d.o might be a better place (CC'ed). > I think you all are aware o

Oracle's Java package status

2011-09-04 Thread Camaleón
Hello, I sent this message to "debian-user" mailing list but as I got no feeback from there I try now here, if this is not the proper list, please tell. I think you all are aware of the recent news for Oracle's java binaries that will be removed from almost every linux distribution repositories¹