OoO Pendant le repas du dimanche 04 septembre 2011, vers 19:56, "Adam
D. Barratt" disait :
>> I did not get an answer on this. Is it OK to upload to
>> stable-proposed-updates?
> I managed to miss it the first time; in future, if you could file such
> requests in the BTS (reportbug will gene
Am 05.09.2011 02:53, schrieb Ricardo Mones:
> On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 22:51:32 +0200
> Michael Biebl wrote:
>
>> Am 04.09.2011 22:37, schrieb Michael Biebl:
>>
>>> - Packages which need to be binNMUed:
>>> claws-mail
>> The reason are the new online states in the D-Bus API which are
>> conditionally
On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 22:51:32 +0200
Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 04.09.2011 22:37, schrieb Michael Biebl:
>
> > - Packages which need to be binNMUed:
> > claws-mail
> > evolution
> > kdebase-runtime
> > libsocialweb
> > packagekit
> > pidgin
>
> In case anyone wonders why those packages need to be
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 01:53:24PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 09:58, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > can the linux-modules-di-* packages be removed from unstable? They seem to
> > be
> > built against 2.6.30 anyway and hence not useful. If so I can file the RM
> > bugs.
> Y
Am 04.09.2011 22:37, schrieb Michael Biebl:
> - Packages which need to be binNMUed:
> claws-mail
> evolution
> kdebase-runtime
> libsocialweb
> packagekit
> pidgin
In case anyone wonders why those packages need to be binNMUed even if they don't
link against libnm-glib2 or libnm-util1.
The reason
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
as part of the ongoing GNOME 3 transitions I'd like to start the
network-manager 0.9 transition soon, as it will be a dependency of
gnome-control-center 3.0.
network-manager 0.9.0-1
Processing changes file: kde4libs_4.4.5-2+squeeze3_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: krb5_1.8.3+dfsg-4squeeze2_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: lintian_2.4.3+squeeze1_i386.changes
Rejecting.
REJECT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
Your message dated Sun, 4 Sep 2011 21:05:48 +0200
with message-id <20110904190548.gl5...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#640386: RM: trac-ja-resource/0.11.5.ja1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #640386,
regarding RM: trac-ja-resource/0.11.5.ja1-1
to be marked as done.
This means
Subject: RM: trac-ja-resource/0.11.5.ja1-1
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: trac-ja-resou...@packages.debian.org
Dear release team,
Please consider removing trac-ja-resource from testing to allow trac to
migrate.
On Sun, 2011-09-04 at 19:43 +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> OoO En ce doux début de matinée du mercredi 31 août 2011, vers 08:52, je
> disais:
> I did not get an answer on this. Is it OK to upload to
> stable-proposed-updates?
I managed to miss it the first time; in future, if you could file such
OoO En ce doux début de matinée du mercredi 31 août 2011, vers 08:52, je
disais:
> python-recaptcha uses a webservice whose URL have changed. A fixed
> version has been uploaded to sid but since the package in stable is not
> usable anymore because of this change, I have prepared an upl
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 10:04:42PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 23:30 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 04:30:41PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2011-08-13 at 14:47 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:48:51AM
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 06:14:50PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
>Hi,
>
>so apparently September is a very bad month to get CDs done. I'm hereby
>proposing the following with the hope that we can do it that way:
>
> * Lenny: October 1st
> * Squeeze: October 8th
>
>Can we do that, pretty please? :)
Hi,
so apparently September is a very bad month to get CDs done. I'm hereby
proposing the following with the hope that we can do it that way:
* Lenny: October 1st
* Squeeze: October 8th
Can we do that, pretty please? :)
Any objections?
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp Kern
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Thanks for working on this. As a general comment, if you're submitting
> patches for both stable and oldstable please do so using two different
> bugs; otherwise we can't track the acceptance and release status in a
> sane way.
Ok, I'll do that in the future.
> I'd be
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 21:07 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> .gitignore|7 -
> t/tests/shared-libs-la-files/debian/_python_module.la | 12 -
> t/tests/shared-libs-la-files/debian/kio_locate.la | 15 ---
> t/tests/shared-lib
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 19:09 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 01:34:34AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > I've attached the patches for both packages to this mail. Phil, is it ok
> > for these to be uploaded to stable-proposed-updates? This fixes a bug that
> > makes squeeze ke
On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 18:45 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> tags 637803 + squeeze pending
Hmmm, that should have been confirmed, not pending, at that point. Ah
well.
> Thanks; please feel free to go ahead with the upload.
For the record, the upload happened and I've marked it for acceptance at
t
On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 13:54:17 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2011-09-04 12:22, Camaleón wrote:
>> I sent this message to "debian-user" mailing list but as I got no
>> feeback from there I try now here, if this is not the proper list,
>> please tell.
>>
>>
> Hi,
>
> I am thinking d-java@l.d.o
Le dimanche 04 septembre 2011 13:54:17, Niels Thykier a écrit :
> As I recall, java-common used to have some templates for creating a
> deb-package to trick APT into thinking that Java was installed. I
> suppose those could be restored - feel free to file a wishlist bug
> against java-common for t
On 2011-09-04 12:22, Camaleón wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I sent this message to "debian-user" mailing list but as I got no feeback
> from there I try now here, if this is not the proper list, please tell.
>
Hi,
I am thinking d-java@l.d.o might be a better place (CC'ed).
> I think you all are aware o
Hello,
I sent this message to "debian-user" mailing list but as I got no feeback
from there I try now here, if this is not the proper list, please tell.
I think you all are aware of the recent news for Oracle's java binaries
that will be removed from almost every linux distribution repositories¹
22 matches
Mail list logo