Bug#637040: [php-maint] Bug#638755: php5: remove t1lib dependency

2011-08-21 Thread Raphael Geissert
tag 638755 - patch tag 638755 moreinfo thanks Hi, On Sunday 21 August 2011 11:01:44 Michael Gilbert wrote: > package: php5 > version: 5.3.7-1 > severity: important > tag: patch > > t1lib is slated to be removed (in favor of freetype) before wheezy ships > [0],[1]. This package is currently one o

Buildd vs. Cowbuilder: broken symlink in procps dev package on one architecture

2011-08-21 Thread Michael Prokop
Hi, Christian Hofstaedtler prepared a stable update for procps regarding #632749 (with ACK from Craig as the procps maintainer and from Adam from the release team - Cc-ing both of them therefore FYI). While reviewing the package I noticed an interesting bug, causing procps in squeeze to have an a

Bug#638796: nmu: compiz_0.8.4-4

2011-08-21 Thread Ben Hutchings
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu compiz_0.8.4-4 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new libmetacity-private0 (Closes: #617763)" -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unst

Bug#638779: (no subject)

2011-08-21 Thread Iain Lane
exp needs doing as well. nmu banshee_2.1.0-2 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against libmtp9 and libgdata1.8-cil' Cheers, -- Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ] Debian Developer [ la...@debian.org ] Ubuntu Developer

Bug#638781: RM: libgtfb/0.1.0-1

2011-08-21 Thread Matt Flax
I am currently waiting for the key maintainers to update my new GPG key. This will allow me to update packages. I have been waiting some time for this to happen. I do not request that this package be removed, rather I request that my signed key (which I have already uploaded) be added to the keyri

Bug#638781: RM: libgtfb/0.1.0-1

2011-08-21 Thread Julien Cristau
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Tags: squeeze Usertags: rm (x-debbugs-cc libgtfb@pdo) libgtfb0 and libgtfb-dev's symlinks point either somewhere in /build/buildd (on !amd64) or to /home/flatmax (on amd64). I'm guessing this means the pack

Processed: tagging 637651

2011-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 637651 + squeeze confirmed Bug #637651 [release.debian.org] pu: package usbutils/0.87-5squeeze1 Added tag(s) squeeze and confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 637651: http://bugs.debian.o

Bug#637651: pu: package usbutils/0.87-5squeeze1

2011-08-21 Thread Philipp Kern
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 02:51:37PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > usbutils as an RC bug in Squeeze on kfreebsd (#612353), which can be > fixed by adjusting the build-dependencies on these architectures to > use libusb2-dev instead. > > At the same time, I have also updated the usb.ids file so th

Bug#638777: marked as done (nmu: libogre-perl_0.50-2)

2011-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 21 Aug 2011 20:36:51 +0200 with message-id <20110821183651.ge26...@mraw.org> and subject line Re: Bug#638777: nmu: libogre-perl_0.50-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #638777, regarding nmu: libogre-perl_0.50-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#638779: nmu: banshee_2.0.1-4

2011-08-21 Thread Chow Loong Jin
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu banshee_2.0.1-4 . ALL . -m "Rebuild for new libgdata" -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers natty-updates APT policy: (500, 'natty-updates'), (500, 'natty-s

Bug#638777: nmu: libogre-perl_0.50-2

2011-08-21 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Not sure why this one was failing, but it now succeeds on pescetti. Could you retry this one? nmu libogre-perl_0.50-2 . powerpc . -m "Rebuild against perl 5.12" Thanks, Dominic. -- To U

Bug#637040: RM: t1lib/5.1.2-3

2011-08-21 Thread Michael Gilbert
tag 637040 -moreinfo thanks On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: > As said on irc, filing (non-RC for now) bugs against the reverse > dependencies and providing patches as much as possible should happen > prior to any removal.  Tagging moreinfo for now. Bugs are now submitted (w

Processed: Re: Bug#637040: RM: t1lib/5.1.2-3

2011-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 637040 -moreinfo Bug #637040 [release.debian.org] RM: t1lib/5.1.2-3 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 637040: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=637040 Debi

Bug#638754: nmu: libdevice-cdio-perl_0.2.4-5

2011-08-21 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu This should now succeed, following the fix for #579450 (and #626322) nmu libdevice-cdio-perl_0.2.4-5 . armel i386 kfreebsd-i386 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc . -m "Rebuild against perl 5.1

Bug#638712: binNMUs for packages exporting (rest|save)(32|64\|)(fpr|gpr) symbols

2011-08-21 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 13:20:59 +0200, Clara Gnos wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: binnmu > > It was noticed in bug #638271 that some powerpc binaries would lead to > unusable compilation results. The reason for th

Bug#638712: binNMUs for packages exporting (rest|save)(32|64\|)(fpr|gpr) symbols

2011-08-21 Thread Clara Gnos
On Sunday 21 August 2011 13:20:59 Clara Gnos wrote: > nmu linux-2.6_3.0.0-2 . ALL . -m > 'Rebuild to remove (rest|save)(32|64\|)(fpr|gpr) symbols.' [...] > nmu eglibc_2.13-16 . ALL . -m > 'Rebuild to remove (rest|save)(32|64\|)(fpr|gpr) symbols.' There seem to be some false positives. > nmu wi

Processed: block

2011-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 638271 by 638712 Bug #638271 [rlvm] rlvm: FTBFS on powerpc Was not blocked by any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 638271: 638712 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 638271: http://bugs.debian.org/

Gajim 0.13.4-4

2011-08-21 Thread Yann Leboulanger
Hi, I fixed an important functionality bug in Gajim that makes it use 100% CPU when connecting (#634880) [0]. I added a patch (attached) that is already in newer versions of Gajim for months [1]. The package is ready, can I ask my Debian developper to upload it? Thanks. [0] http://bugs.debi