Bug#630511: marked as done (transition gnutls26)

2011-08-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 16 Aug 2011 08:29:19 +0200 with message-id <20110816062919.gc32...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr> and subject line Re: gnutls 2.12.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #630511, regarding transition gnutls26 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Bug#622363: marked as done (transition: libnotify 0.7)

2011-08-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 16 Aug 2011 08:28:21 +0200 with message-id <20110816062821.gb32...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr> and subject line Re: Bug#622363: transition: libnotify 0.7 has caused the Debian Bug report #622363, regarding transition: libnotify 0.7 to be marked as done. This means that you clai

Bug#637963: nmu: tiff_3.9.5-1

2011-08-15 Thread Steve M. Robbins
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu tiff_3.9.5-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libjpeg8" Currently, linking using both -ltiff and -ljpeg produces a warning: /usr/bin/ld: warning: libjpeg.so.62, needed by /usr/lib64/libtif

Bug#637331: transition: nautilus

2011-08-15 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 15.08.2011 22:26, schrieb Raphael Hertzog: > On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Josselin Mouette wrote: >> Le jeudi 11 août 2011 à 20:31 +0200, Michael Biebl a écrit : The alternative is to backport the necessary changes in g-s-d (which sounds insane) or to re-add the necessary support in nautilus

Bug#637331: transition: nautilus

2011-08-15 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le jeudi 11 août 2011 à 20:31 +0200, Michael Biebl a écrit : > > > The alternative is to backport the necessary changes in g-s-d (which > > > sounds insane) or to re-add the necessary support in nautilus (which is > > > far from trivial). > > > > I'd

Bug#637384: pu: package lintian/2.4.3+squeeze1

2011-08-15 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2011-08-12 22:23, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > tag 637384 + confirmed > thanks > > [...] > > Nah, I just forgot there were any test cases that I'd actually bothered > doing that with. > > Please feel free to upload. > > Regards, > > Adam > > Done. :) ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t

Re: debian armel recertification status

2011-08-15 Thread Andreas Barth
* Riku Voipio (riku.voi...@iki.fi) [110815 11:42]: > buildds: 5 > - arcadelt and argento are no longer in use > > buildd redundancy: partial > - 1 in different location but would struggle to keep up alone > > buildd-dsa: yes > - All armel buildd are under DSA control fixed. Andi -- To UN

Bug#636945: [Fwd: Re: [Pkg-ace-devel] Bug#636945: pu: package ace/5.7.7-4]

2011-08-15 Thread Thomas Girard
Message transféré De: Thomas Girard À: debian-release@lists.debian.org Cc: pkg-ace-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Sujet: Re: [Pkg-ace-devel] Bug#636945: pu: package ace/5.7.7-4 Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 12:20:57 +0200 Hello, > I'll make a new package and publish it again at the sam

Re: [Pkg-ace-devel] Bug#636945: pu: package ace/5.7.7-4

2011-08-15 Thread Thomas Girard
Hello, > I'll make a new package and publish it again at the same location, > signed this time. I've just uploaded a fixed version for review. Thanks, Thomas signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

debian armel recertification status

2011-08-15 Thread Riku Voipio
Hi, Looking at: http://release.debian.org/wheezy/arch_qualify.html There is a few updates for armel; buildds: 5 - arcadelt and argento are no longer in use buildd redundancy: partial - 1 in different location but would struggle to keep up alone buildd-dsa: yes - All armel buildd are under

Bug#631684: transition: libmtp

2011-08-15 Thread Alessio Treglia
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Philipp Kern wrote: > I guess we could do this when libnotify's done. OK, thank you! -- Alessio Treglia          | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer         | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer    | quadris...@ubuntu.com 0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593

Bug#629477: transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui, libobjc

2011-08-15 Thread Matthias Klose
On 06/08/2011 08:19 PM, Yavor Doganov wrote: > Julien Cristau wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 21:44:15 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote: >>> 1) The modified gnustep-make package will have no trouble migrating to >>>testing (before the transition even commences), so it would make >>>GNUstep deve