Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu valgrind_1:3.6.1-5 . amd64 . -m "rebuild for to strip references to
/home/madcoder/bin/gdb (Closes: #626886)"
The bug is due to valgrind being built in an unclean environment.
--
To
Processing changes file: strongswan_4.4.1-7_i386.changes
Rejecting.
REJECT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qln16-0006yr...@franck.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Not in testing: libavg, gpib, lasso, dolfin, mayavi2
> unblock 622279 with 555079 577321 580678 624777 624925 625148
Bug #622279 [release.debian.org] transition: python-defaults
Was blocked by: 625676 622966 623587 623578 625171 622912 580678 62
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # FTBFS with --as-needed doesn't affects unstable/wheezy:
> unblock 622279 with 605839
Bug #622279 [release.debian.org] transition: python-defaults
Was blocked by: 624810 616364 605875 623165 621402 625676 614619 623587 622966
625678 623578 62297
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hello,
[ Disclaimer: I've already asked security team about this upload and they told
me to do it via s-p-u ]
This upload would fix 2 security issues. Change-by-change details are below
while f
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hello,
[ Disclaimer: I've already asked security team about this upload and they told
me to do it via s-p-u ]
This upload would contain a patch that improves fix for CVE-2010-1000.
Change-by-ch
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hello,
[ Disclaimer: I've already asked security team about this upload and they told
me to do it via s-p-u ]
The upload would fix 3 CVEs and bug #612675. Change-by-change details are below
whi
Processing changes file: apr_1.4.2-6+squeeze1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: apr_1.4.2-6+squeeze1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: apr_1.4.2-6+squeeze1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: apr_1.4.2-6+squeeze1_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 11:12:42AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 21:15:04 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>
> > Hello guys,
> >
> > Just to let you know that we are planning to upload a new upstream
> > release of the hdf5 libraries (1.8.4 => 1.8.6).
> > We will switch the
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 01:25:27PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 01:35:39PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:11:58PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > > Attached is a debdiff of the build in a squeeze chroot; packages
> > > available at http://www.codelibr
Processing changes file: icedove_3.0.11-1+squeeze2_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: icedove_3.0.11-1+squeeze2_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: icedove_3.0.11-1+squeeze2_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: icedove_3.0.11-1+squeeze2_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Proce
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 13.05.2011, 22:17 +0200 schrieb Raphael Hertzog:
> On Wed, 11 May 2011, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > * Do you think it can handle all current and anticipatable
> > requirements? (I’m not involved in release team work and might missed
> > some conditions.)
>
> You mention that
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 01:35:39PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:11:58PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > Attached is a debdiff of the build in a squeeze chroot; packages
> > available at http://www.codelibre.net/~rleigh/schroot-squeeze/
>
> Is this fixed in unstable already
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:11:58PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Attached is a debdiff of the build in a squeeze chroot; packages
> available at http://www.codelibre.net/~rleigh/schroot-squeeze/
Is this fixed in unstable already? It needs to be.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp Kern
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:00:41AM +1000, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 22:19:43 +0200, René Mayrhofer wrote:
> > Would you prefer that I upload a new package with the fix to debian/rules
> > network-manager handling with a new version or just again with the same one?
> I think w
Heya,
Raphael Hertzog writes:
>> * What do you think of the advantages and improvements that I point
>> out?
> To me it looks great but I have no experience with SAT solver and I
> wonder whether the sheer amount of predicates that it will have to handle
> will not result in something dog-slow.
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 16:28:00 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> We would like to perform the transition from libnotify1 to libnotify4.
>
> This transition will requires sourcefull uploads as there is a
> (minimal) API change.
>
That's not good. If the packages can be made to support both AP
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 21:15:04 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> Just to let you know that we are planning to upload a new upstream
> release of the hdf5 libraries (1.8.4 => 1.8.6).
> We will switch the API to the version 1.8 (from the 1.6).
> It might break some packages but th
18 matches
Mail list logo
