Processing changes file: approx_4.5-1+squeeze1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qlqxn-0001w4...@franck.debian.org
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 09:29:13AM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 12:46:54AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> > perl | 5.12.3-6 | testing | source, amd64, armel, i386, ia64,
> > kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
>
> Many thanks Jul
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 568141
Bug #568141 {Done: Julien Cristau } [release.debian.org]
release.debian.org: Latest point release hard to follow / confusing
> reassign 568141 www.debian.org
Bug #568141 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org: Latest point release
reopen 568141
reassign 568141 www.debian.org
retitle 568141 Syncing of version numbers after point release should be more
explicit
Hello Luk,
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 05:42:23PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> On 05/14/2011 05:13 PM, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 12:43:55PM +0200,
On 05/14/2011 05:13 PM, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Hello Luk,
> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 12:43:55PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>> On 05/14/2011 10:44 AM, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
>>> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:33:21AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
This is still about the fact that you're expecting al
Hello Luk,
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 12:43:55PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> On 05/14/2011 10:44 AM, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:33:21AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >> This is still about the fact that you're expecting all debian.org
> >> resources to be in sync at point re
Your message dated Sat, 14 May 2011 15:07:20 +0200
with message-id <4dce7e88.5020...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#626691: nmu: rasmol/2.7.5-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #626691,
regarding nmu: rasmol/2.7.5-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Your message dated Sat, 14 May 2011 13:01:49 +0100
with message-id <1305374510.20523.3417.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#626690: nmu: ldb transition
has caused the Debian Bug report #626690,
regarding nmu: ldb transition
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 626692 lbdb 0.37
Bug #626692 [release.debian.org] nmu: lbdb/0.37
Bug reassigned from package 'release.debian.org' to 'lbdb'.
Bug #626692 [lbdb] nmu: lbdb/0.37
Bug Marked as found in versions lbdb/0.37.
> severity 626692 serious
Bug #62669
reassign 626692 lbdb 0.37
severity 626692 serious
retitle 626692 lbdb: unbuildable in sid (libvformat1-dev dropped)
thanks
Hi,
On Sat, 2011-05-14 at 13:01 +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnm
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 626691 + moreinfo
Bug #626691 [release.debian.org] nmu: rasmol/2.7.5-3
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
626691: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=626691
Deb
tag 626691 + moreinfo
thanks
On Sat, 2011-05-14 at 13:02 +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> nmu rasmol_2.7.5-3 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against neartree'
Hmmm, rasmol doesn't appear to end up with a binary dependency on
libcneartree. I wonder if that's a bug, one way or the other.
Regards,
Adam
--
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu lbdb_0.37 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against libvformat'
--
.''`.
: :' : Luca Falavigna
`. `'
`-
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu rasmol_2.7.5-3 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against neartree'
--
.''`.
: :' : Luca Falavigna
`. `'
`-
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu openchange_1:0.10~bzr1804-1 . armel . -m 'Rebuild against ldb'
nmu samba4_4.0.0~alpha14~bzr13684.dfsg1-1 . armel . -m 'Rebuild against ldb'
nmu sssd_1.2.1-4.1 . armel . -m 'Rebuild agains
On 05/14/2011 10:44 AM, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Hello Julien,
> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:33:21AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> This is still about the fact that you're expecting all debian.org
>> resources to be in sync at point release time. I don't think that's
>> reasonable, the release p
Hello Julien,
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:33:21AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> This is still about the fact that you're expecting all debian.org
> resources to be in sync at point release time. I don't think that's
> reasonable, the release process is complicated enough as it is. Please
> don't
Your message dated Sat, 14 May 2011 10:33:21 +0200
with message-id <20110514083320.gl2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#568141: release.debian.org: Latest point release hard
to follow / confusing
has caused the Debian Bug report #568141,
regarding release.debian.org: Latest poin
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 568141
Bug #568141 {Done: Julien Cristau } [release.debian.org]
release.debian.org: Latest point release hard to follow / confusing
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
568141: http://bugs.debia
reopen 568141
thanks
Hello Julien,
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 01:31:16AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 19:15:01 +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
>
> > Recently a point release was shipped (being installed as I type). At
> > the time of releasing (i.e. when apt saw it) no notic
20 matches
Mail list logo
