Processing changes file: gdm3_2.30.5-6squeeze3_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qdmrs-yw...@franck.debian.org
On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 20:09 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 20 avril 2011 à 00:32 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
> > I’ll just wait a few days for my urge to strangle kittens named after
> > the libtool developers to pass, and integrate just the following
> > patches:
> > http://gi
Le mercredi 20 avril 2011 à 00:32 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
> I’ll just wait a few days for my urge to strangle kittens named after
> the libtool developers to pass, and integrate just the following
> patches:
> http://git.gnome.org/browse/gdm/commit/?h=gnome-2-30&id=756825d337c5a040207459
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 623719 + pending
Bug #623719 [release.debian.org] transition: muparser
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
623719: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=623719
Deb
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 623719 transition: muparser
Bug #623719 [release.debian.org] nmu: Please bin nmu the following for a SONAME
bump of libmuparser
Changed Bug title to 'transition: muparser' from 'nmu: Please bin nmu the
following for a SONAME bump of libm
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags 623719 = transition
thanks
Turning this bugreport into a transition bug, to keep it under someone's
radar.
On 07/03/2011 11:49, Scott Howard wrote:
>
> nmu libgetfem4++_4.1.1-2 . ALL . -m "Build against new libmuparser0debian1"
> nmu meshlab_1
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu libgetfem4++_4.1.1-2 . ALL . -m "Build against new libmuparser0debian1"
nmu meshlab_1.3.0a+dfsg1-1 . ALL . -m "Build against new libmuparser0debian1"
nmu ovito_0.9.2-1 . ALL . -m "Build a
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 08:52:31AM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> severity 622817 important
> thanks
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 04:18:36PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * Niko Tyni:
> >
> > > Security team, I assume this is going to be fixed through a DSA?
> >
> > I don't think this is a security
On 22/04/2011 13:24, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 09:37:54 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>
>> This transition is tracked on:
>>
>> http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/eina.html
>>
>> AFAICS, there are still 4 packages to update to get this transtition
>> done.
>
> None o
On 22/04/2011 13:24, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 09:37:54 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>
>> This transition is tracked on:
>>
>> http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/eina.html
>>
>> AFAICS, there are still 4 packages to update to get this transtition
>> done.
>
> None of
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 09:37:54 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> This transition is tracked on:
>
> http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/eina.html
>
> AFAICS, there are still 4 packages to update to get this transtition done.
None of those 4 packages are in testing at this point though
Thanks for the info.
Just let me know if I can help with the transition.
Regards,
Mark-Willem Jansen
> Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 09:37:54 +0200
> From: me...@dogguy.org
> To: markwil...@hotmail.com
> CC: debian-release@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Hinti
On 04/22/2011 12:22 AM, Mark-Willem Jansen wrote:
While waiting for the EFL's to go into testing, I see that eina and
eet are holding everything up. Eina and eet both have a version in
testing. Only the name of one of the packages related to the eina
source will change, namely libeina-svn-06 wil
13 matches
Mail list logo
