[SRM] dpkg 1.15.8.11 for squeeze

2011-04-16 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! We've fixed several regressions on the 1.15.x series, and I'd like to upload a new 1.15.8.11 release targetting squeeze. I'm attaching the interesting git commits (omitted translations and a revert). Maybe there will still be additional translation updates before the upload though. Here's the

Bug#622947: per-maintainer insights into migrations and transitions

2011-04-16 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 13:33 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > grep-excuses takes into account DEBFULLNAME, if no packages or maintainer > are given on the command line. Isn't that what you want? That doesn't appear to work with -w nor with an email address since update_excuses.html.gz doesn't contain

Bug#621101: transition: db (db4,6, db4.7, db4.8)

2011-04-16 Thread Ricardo Mones
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 22:30:13 +0200 Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > >Just curious, shouldn't libetpan be appearing on that list? > >IIRC it build-depends on libdb-dev. > > > > Is *is* there. Untick "hide fully (re-)built packages" to see it. Oops, you're absolutely right, sorry for the noise ;

Bug#621101: transition: db (db4,6, db4.7, db4.8)

2011-04-16 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 04/16/2011 08:31 PM, Ricardo Mones wrote: On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 15:52:45 +0200 Mehdi Dogguy wrote: On 06/04/2011 16:43, Ondřej Surý wrote: I would like to coordinate reduction of BDB packages since I took the unhappy job (as I could expect) to maintain BDB in Debian after Clint have orphane

Re: Fwd: Bug#616482: strongswan-ikev1: virtual ips not released if xauth name does not match id

2011-04-16 Thread René Mayrhofer
Am Freitag 15 April 2011, um 19:33:05 schrieb Adam D. Barratt: > On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 21:46 +0200, René Mayrhofer wrote: > > I have now integrated the cherry-picked upstream patch into my > > strongswan-sqeeze branch at the alioth git repository > > (ssh://alioth.debian.org/git/pkg-swan/strongswan

NEW changes in proposedupdates

2011-04-16 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: josm_0.0.svn3376-1+squeeze1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: softhsm_1.1.4-4+squeeze1_amd64.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Ar

Bug#621101: transition: db (db4,6, db4.7, db4.8)

2011-04-16 Thread Ricardo Mones
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 15:52:45 +0200 Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > On 06/04/2011 16:43, Ondřej Surý wrote: > > > > I would like to coordinate reduction of BDB packages since I took the > > unhappy job (as I could expect) to maintain BDB in Debian after Clint > > have orphaned them. > > > > I've added a pa

Bug#623014: gcc-defaults: please default to gcc-4.5 on mips and mipsel

2011-04-16 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Package: gcc-defaults Version: 1.102 Severity: wishlist Now that gcc-4.5 seems to be in a good shape, I think it's time to make it the default on mips and mipsel. Note that it introduces a few changes: - The default ABI in gcc-4.5 is MIPS II instead of MIPS I. It means that it's not necessary a

Ispell transition

2011-04-16 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
Hi. Sorry if this topic has been raised already somewhere else, but didn't find any details about your transition. ispell 3.3.02-4, currently staying in sid, Breaks several packages providing an ispell-dictionary. While I'm sure you have good reasons to do so, I do wonder if you already talked

Processed: tagging 618871

2011-04-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 618871 + pending Bug #618871 [release.debian.org] transition: ocaml Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 618871: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=618871 Debian

Bug#622947: per-maintainer insights into migrations and transitions

2011-04-16 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 04/16/2011 02:51 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 13:33 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: On 04/16/2011 06:49 AM, Paul Wise wrote: It would be nice to be able to easily find out: * which of the packages I am responsible for haven't yet migrated to testing after the 10/5/2 day perio

Processed: Re: Bug#620975: transition: python-apt

2011-04-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 620975 with 622279 Bug #620975 [release.debian.org] transition: python-apt Was blocked by: 617272 572072 604544 572350 572087 572059 Added blocking bug(s) of 620975: 622279 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need as

Bug#620975: transition: python-apt

2011-04-16 Thread Julian Andres Klode
block 620975 with 622279 thanks On Di, 2011-04-05 at 16:48 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > As I wrote some time ago, the APT team would like to disable > the old python-apt

Bug#622947: per-maintainer insights into migrations and transitions

2011-04-16 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 13:33 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > On 04/16/2011 06:49 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > > It would be nice to be able to easily find out: > > > >* which of the packages I am responsible for haven't yet migrated > > to testing after the 10/5/2 day period and why > > gre

Processed: block 622279 with 622912

2011-04-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 622279 with 622912 Bug #622279 [release.debian.org] transition: python-defaults Was blocked by: 622154 616364 622001 621993 618094 606681 622976 621932 Added blocking bug(s) of 622279: 622966, 622978, and 622912 > thanks Stopping processing

Processed: unblock 622279 with 622978

2011-04-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unblock 622279 with 622978 Bug #622279 [release.debian.org] transition: python-defaults Was blocked by: 622154 616364 622001 621993 618094 622978 606681 621932 622976 Removed blocking bug(s) of 622279: 622966, 622978, and 622912 > thanks Stopping

Bug#622947: per-maintainer insights into migrations and transitions

2011-04-16 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 04/16/2011 06:49 AM, Paul Wise wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: wishlist It would be nice to be able to easily find out: * which of the packages I am responsible for haven't yet migrated to testing after the 10/5/2 day period and why grep-excuses takes into acco

Processed: block 622279 with 622976 622978

2011-04-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 622279 with 622976 622978 Bug #622279 [release.debian.org] transition: python-defaults Was blocked by: 622154 616364 618094 606681 622001 621932 621993 Added blocking bug(s) of 622279: 622978 and 622976 > thanks Stopping processing here. Pl

Bug#622973: pu: package josm/0.0.svn3376-1+squeeze1

2011-04-16 Thread David Paleino
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 11:32:42 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 11:55 +0200, David Paleino wrote: > > I'm writing to you to ask for a possible p-u upload for JOSM. > > > > OpenStreetMap is pursuing a process to change the license of its data. > > Tomorrow it will enter Phase II

Bug#622973: pu: package josm/0.0.svn3376-1+squeeze1

2011-04-16 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 11:55 +0200, David Paleino wrote: > I'm writing to you to ask for a possible p-u upload for JOSM. > > OpenStreetMap is pursuing a process to change the license of its data. > Tomorrow it will enter Phase III, i.e. a contributor has to explicitely accept > or decline the new l

Bug#622973: pu: package josm/0.0.svn3376-1+squeeze1

2011-04-16 Thread David Paleino
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Dear Release Team, I'm writing to you to ask for a possible p-u upload for JOSM. OpenStreetMap is pursuing a process to change the license of its data. Tomorrow it will enter Phase III, i.e. a c