Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
(I sent the same request manually on March 19th. However, after more
thinking, I think that using a bug report makes it easier for the
release team to track things. No intent from me to put press
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
> By the way, should I have used the BTS for this request? I became used
> to it during the freeze but went back to old-style requests with that
> one.
I finally settled to use the BTS. Please bash (or dash) me if that's
not wished..:-)
signatur
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 21:48 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 30.03.2011 21:17, Bill Traynor wrote:
> > On 11-03-30 02:36 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >> On 30.03.2011 07:05, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> >>> - ArchiveQualification of sh4
> >>>http://wiki.debian.org/ArchiveQualification/sh4
> >>>
>
Hi,
2011/3/31 Mark Hymers :
> On Wed, 30, Mar, 2011 at 12:02:44PM -0400, Bill Traynor spoke thus..
>> Not sure why STMs activities are relevant? Renesas owns the IP and is
>> moving forward with SH4-based cores.
>
> Another question which has been brought up relates to buildds. What
> number of
Hi,
2011/3/30 Steve McIntyre :
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 02:05:52PM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
>>Dear release team.
>>
>>We(sh4 porting team) are now trying to run Debian on Renesas SH(sh4) CPU.
>> http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/architecture.php?suite=unstable&a=sh4
>>
>>We want to su
Hi,
2011/3/31 Matthias Klose :
> On 30.03.2011 21:17, Bill Traynor wrote:
>> On 11-03-30 02:36 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> On 30.03.2011 07:05, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
- ArchiveQualification of sh4
http://wiki.debian.org/ArchiveQualification/sh4
How do you think about inc
Le 29/03/2011 19:52, Julien Cristau a écrit :
>>> The Debian OCaml team is ready for a transition to OCaml 3.12.0. All
>>> packages depending on ocaml-base-nox-3.11.2 and ocaml-base-3.11.2 will
>>> be affected.
>>>
>>> I am waiting for the approval from the release team to proceed.
>>
>> Any news o
On 11-03-30 03:48 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 30.03.2011 21:17, Bill Traynor wrote:
On 11-03-30 02:36 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 30.03.2011 07:05, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
- ArchiveQualification of sh4
http://wiki.debian.org/ArchiveQualification/sh4
How do you think about including sh4
[Piotr Ożarowski, 2011-03-30]
> FYI: I plan to upload python-sphinx, python-defaults (without Python
> 2.5, with Python 2.7) and python3-defaults (with Python 3.2 instead of
> Python 3.2) tomorrow. Please report bug against tech-ctte and CC me if
> you think it's not a good idea.
I know I shouldn'
On 30.03.2011 21:17, Bill Traynor wrote:
> On 11-03-30 02:36 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> On 30.03.2011 07:05, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
>>> - ArchiveQualification of sh4
>>>http://wiki.debian.org/ArchiveQualification/sh4
>>>
>>> How do you think about including sh4 in the next release?
>> "Tool
On 11-03-30 02:36 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 30.03.2011 07:05, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
- ArchiveQualification of sh4
http://wiki.debian.org/ArchiveQualification/sh4
How do you think about including sh4 in the next release?
"Toolchain was supported by CodeSourcery"
so it's not supported
On 30.03.2011 07:05, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> - ArchiveQualification of sh4
> http://wiki.debian.org/ArchiveQualification/sh4
>
> How do you think about including sh4 in the next release?
"Toolchain was supported by CodeSourcery"
so it's not supported anymore? If this is correct, then this i
Am 30.03.2011 19:21, schrieb Luk Claes:
> Regarding reliability I'm doing some work regarding NFS, though one of
> the main outstanding issues is the race between availability of the
> network devices and the end of the network init script AFAICS. It would
> also not be a bad idea to have a discuss
On 03/30/2011 07:11 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 12:19 -0700, Ludovico Cavedon wrote:
>> nmu qscintilla2_2.4.3-1+b1 . alpha amd64 sparc64 . -m "Package rebuild.
>> (Closes: #619096)."
>
> sparc64 isn't an official Debian architecture, so we can't schedule
> binNMUs there; yo
Hi all,
[...]
> # package quality
> Advocate: Holger Levsen and Luk Claes
> State: confirmed
> Wiki: http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/PackagesQuality
>
> This is a never ending goal of sustaining our packages quality by
> improving our tests and following up closely... so needless to sa
Le mercredi 30 mars 2011 à 19:21 +0200, Luk Claes a écrit :
> # remove obsolete libraries
> Advocate: Barry deFreese and Luk Claes
> State: confirmed
> Wiki: http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/RemoveOldLibs
>
> This worked quite well and should continue so we can get rid of obsolete
> libra
Hi
Below an update of the release goals I advocated and some thoughts on
others.
> Release Goals
> -
> As a first step towards establishing release goals for wheezy, we will
be reviewing
> each of the goals which we had for squeeze [RDO:SGoals] to see which
have been achieved and whic
On Wed, 30, Mar, 2011 at 12:02:44PM -0400, Bill Traynor spoke thus..
> Not sure why STMs activities are relevant? Renesas owns the IP and is
> moving forward with SH4-based cores.
Another question which has been brought up relates to buildds. What
number of buildds is it estimated would be nee
On 11-03-30 09:17 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 02:05:52PM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
Dear release team.
We(sh4 porting team) are now trying to run Debian on Renesas SH(sh4) CPU.
http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/architecture.php?suite=unstable&a=sh4
We want to s
Hi,
the plans of the GNOME team for GNOME 3 are not entirely complete yet.
However there are a number of transitions coming up that you should be
aware of.
Currently, there is a gobject-introspection transition going on, and the
gtk+2.0 / gdk-pixbuf split. These are both prerequisites for gtk+3.0
On 03/30/2011 09:50 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Please go ahead, with the exception of doing "s/unstable/stable/" in the
> changelog stanza. :-)
OK, i've uploaded, with a correct changelog. Thanks for noticing that!
Please let me know if there's anything else that i need to do; i've
never put
(Please keep me in Cc, I'm not subscribed)
Proposer: Tollef Fog Heen
Seconder: Michael Biebl
Currently, /lib/init/rw exists as a place for applications that need
write access early (before $local_fs) to put their data. In addition,
some abuse /dev/shm for this. A couple of years back, /run wa
[Julien Cristau, 2011-03-30]
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 16:02:56 +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
>
> > FYI: I plan to upload python-sphinx, python-defaults (without Python
> > 2.5, with Python 2.7) and python3-defaults (with Python 3.2 instead of
> > Python 3.2) tomorrow. Please report bug against te
On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 12:19 -0700, Ludovico Cavedon wrote:
> nmu qscintilla2_2.4.3-1+b1 . alpha amd64 sparc64 . -m "Package rebuild.
> (Closes: #619096)."
sparc64 isn't an official Debian architecture, so we can't schedule
binNMUs there; you'd need to talk to the port maintainers.
The +b1 binNMU
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 16:02:56 +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> FYI: I plan to upload python-sphinx, python-defaults (without Python
> 2.5, with Python 2.7) and python3-defaults (with Python 3.2 instead of
> Python 3.2) tomorrow. Please report bug against tech-ctte and CC me if
> you think it's n
FYI: I plan to upload python-sphinx, python-defaults (without Python
2.5, with Python 2.7) and python3-defaults (with Python 3.2 instead of
Python 3.2) tomorrow. Please report bug against tech-ctte and CC me if
you think it's not a good idea.
--
Piotr Ożarowski Debian GNU/L
Processing changes file: gdm3_2.30.5-6squeeze2_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: gdm3_2.30.5-6squeeze2_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: gdm3_2.30.5-6squeeze2_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: gdm3_2.30.5-6squeeze2_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes fi
Julien Cristau (30/03/2011):
> One thing that came up is that we need to make sure all sid buildd
> chroots have debconf-english installed and not debconf-i18n before
> that happens (debconf-i18n depends on liblocale-gettext-perl, which
> depends on perlapi-5.10.0). Cc:-ing debian-wb-team so this
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 04:00 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> "debootstrap --variant=fakechroot" does not currently work on squeeze.
> It fails with error messages like:
>
> > W: Failure while unpacking required packages. This will be attempted up to
> > five times.
>
>
> These errors appear
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 15:42:56 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Julien Cristau (30/03/2011):
> > One thing that came up is that we need to make sure all sid buildd
> > chroots have debconf-english installed and not debconf-i18n before
> > that happens (debconf-i18n depends on liblocale-gettext-p
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 07:40:26PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> I would like to register an interest in carrying out a perl transition
> soon. This would be to perl 5.10.1 to 5.12.x (x = 3 currently). This
> transition has already been in preparation for some time, and I think
> we are in a g
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 13:54:10 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
> Version:
>
> fcgiwrap doesn't stop properly on squeeze (#602199). I just uploaded 1.0.3-2
> with Jordi's fixes that were pending since four m
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 13:54 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> fcgiwrap doesn't stop properly on squeeze (#602199). I just uploaded 1.0.3-2
> with Jordi's fixes that were pending since four months to unstable.
>
> I'd like to propose the attached fix for squeeze, too.
+fcgiwrap (1.0-1+squeeze1) stable
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 01:26:55 +0600, Евгений Кабиольский wrote:
> Hi
> Is it able to include old firewire stack into next kernel release within
> Squeeze distro?
I don't think so.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubsc
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 02:05:52PM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
>Dear release team.
>
>We(sh4 porting team) are now trying to run Debian on Renesas SH(sh4) CPU.
> http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/architecture.php?suite=unstable&a=sh4
>
>We want to support sh4 by the next release (Wheezy).
Le Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 07:55:39AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
> > If you want to see more details, you can look it up on
> > -merkel:/org/&ftp-debian-org;/testing/update_out/ (or
> > -in merkel:~aba/testing/update_out to see a setup with
> > -a
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:19:08 +, Goedson Teixeira Paix�o wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The version of gnotime currently available in the archive was built
> against an older version of libgtkhml3.14, which makes it not
> installable with the current (3.32.2-1) version of this library. Thus
> I'm r
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 14:11 +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> * Ben Hutchings [2011-03-30 00:11:59]:
>
> > On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 23:26 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 20:31 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > There were a couple of regressions in linux-2.6 version 2.6.32-
Hello,
The version of gnotime currently available in the archive was built
against an older version of libgtkhml3.14, which makes it not
installable with the current (3.32.2-1) version of this library. Thus
I'm requesting a binNMU to fix this.
nmu gnotime_2.3.1~snapshot20091119-3 . ALL .
* Ben Hutchings [2011-03-30 00:11:59]:
> On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 23:26 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 20:31 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > There were a couple of regressions in linux-2.6 version 2.6.32-31 (i.e.
> > > Debian 6.0.1) that should be fixed a.s.a.p:
> > [...]
40 matches
Mail list logo
