Bug#610387: unblock: samba/2:3.5.6~dfsg-4

2011-01-20 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk): > Unfortunately, it looks like this might have to wait until the first > Squeeze point release. > > It appears that the talloc packages from experimental were uploaded to > unstable shortly before the end of last year and as a consequence the >

Re: Squeeze updates for ia32-libs{,-gtk}

2011-01-20 Thread dann frazier
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 07:26:59PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 07:24:01AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > > On Tuesday 18 January 2011 14:54:12 Philipp Kern wrote: > > > > I've refreshed the packages and added two changes that I think are > > > > important for proper suppor

RFC: tcptrack and #602232; any chance for squeeze?

2011-01-20 Thread Leo 'costela' Antunes
Hi RMs, I know you guys probably have enough on your plates right now, but I'd appreciate if someone could spare a couple of minutes. It's a pretty quick problem: I hadn't used the package for a while and didn't notice it completely stopped working with the Squeeze kernel. Granted, the bug was rep

Bug#608350: unblock: gnash/0.8.8-8

2011-01-20 Thread Gabriele Giacone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 reopen 608350 retitle 608350 unblock: gnash/0.8.8-8 thanks On 01/07/2011 10:53 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > On 12/30/2010 06:42 AM, Gabriele Giacone wrote: >> >> Please unblock package gnash >> >> Main reason to unblock it is that 0.8.8-7 makes it workin

Processed: Re: Bug#608350: unblock: gnash/0.8.8-8

2011-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 608350 Bug #608350 {Done: Mehdi Dogguy } [release.debian.org] unblock: gnash/0.8.8-7 > retitle 608350 unblock: gnash/0.8.8-8 Bug #608350 [release.debian.org] unblock: gnash/0.8.8-7 Changed Bug title to 'unblock: gnash/0.8.8-8' from 'unbloc

Processed: Re: Bug#610387: unblock: samba/2:3.5.6~dfsg-4

2011-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 610387 Bug #610387 {Done: "Adam D. Barratt" } [release.debian.org] unblock: samba/2:3.5.6~dfsg-4 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 610387: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610

Bug#610387: unblock: samba/2:3.5.6~dfsg-4

2011-01-20 Thread Adam D. Barratt
reopen 610387 thanks On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 20:54 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 06:45 +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > > Please unblock package samba > > > > This package fixes #606350 (file descriptor leak in pam_winbind). Even > > though upstream claims it to be fixed in

Re: binnmu + unblock request for xtables-addons

2011-01-20 Thread Pierre Chifflier
On 01/20/2011 09:54 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > That's in progress; if you check the "for" column on [1], all the times > are within the past day or so. > > The i386, powerpc and s390 binNMUs are already in the archive and the > armel package will be after tonight's britney run. The status of >

Re: Bug#610656: Drop proposed-updates from "what's new"

2011-01-20 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 20:35:49 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Package: release-notes > > Hi, > > The text in the proposed-updates section of whats-new.dbk indicates that > it is not really a new feature for lenny and was included to raise > awareness. If it served that purpose then there's n

binnmu + unblock request for xtables-addons

2011-01-20 Thread Pierre Chifflier
Hi release team, As discussed some time ago, xtables-addons needs a rebuild in squeeze to be rebuilt with the correct iptables-dev dependencies. The binNMU has been proposed some time ago successfully [1], however the package did not made it into squeeze [2] This caused by the version number (sid

Re: binnmu + unblock request for xtables-addons

2011-01-20 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 21:39 +0100, Pierre Chifflier wrote: > As discussed some time ago, xtables-addons needs a rebuild in squeeze to > be rebuilt with the correct iptables-dev dependencies. [...] > Can you trigger a rebuild of xtables-addons for squeeze/testing ? > Without a rebuild, the package i

Bug#610656: Drop proposed-updates from "what's new"

2011-01-20 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Package: release-notes Hi, The text in the proposed-updates section of whats-new.dbk indicates that it is not really a new feature for lenny and was included to raise awareness. If it served that purpose then there's no need to carry it forward for the squeeze RN; if it didn't then I'm not convi

Re: Fixes for RT 3.x issue CVE-2011-0009

2011-01-20 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 12:39:23PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:10:31 +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > > SRM, could you advise on whether this can be included in Saturday's > > point release? > > > The cutoff for this was on monday. So no. Thanks for confirming;

Bug#610628: unblock: debiandoc-sgml/1.2.16+squeeze1

2011-01-20 Thread Osamu Aoki
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package debiandoc-sgml This 1.2.16+squeeze1 fixes *important* bug #610335 "debiandoc-sgml has too-broad recommends" from Steve Langasek for current testing verion 1.2.15.

Bug#610127: marked as done (RM: ohai/0.5.6-1)

2011-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 20 Jan 2011 12:49:56 +0100 with message-id <20110120114956.gp30...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr> and subject line Re: Bug#610126: RM: chef/0.8.16-4.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #610127, regarding RM: ohai/0.5.6-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#610126: marked as done (RM: chef/0.8.16-4.2)

2011-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 20 Jan 2011 12:49:56 +0100 with message-id <20110120114956.gp30...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr> and subject line Re: Bug#610126: RM: chef/0.8.16-4.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #610126, regarding RM: chef/0.8.16-4.2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Re: Fixes for RT 3.x issue CVE-2011-0009

2011-01-20 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:10:31 +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > SRM, could you advise on whether this can be included in Saturday's > point release? > The cutoff for this was on monday. So no. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Fixes for RT 3.x issue CVE-2011-0009

2011-01-20 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 12:03:31PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Thu, January 20, 2011 09:28, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > This issue has now been released: > > > > > > An proposed update for lenny is now sitting

Re: Fixes for RT 3.x issue CVE-2011-0009

2011-01-20 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Thu, January 20, 2011 09:28, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:50:58PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: >> Sorry, I got the timing wrong. It's tomorrow, Wednesday, that I believe >> the planned release is. I'll email both you and the stable release >> managers after then and

Re: Fixes for RT 3.x issue CVE-2011-0009 in testing: preapproval requested

2011-01-20 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 09:41:34AM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 08:39:12AM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > > I attach the full interdiff for review. Please could you let me > > know whether it would be okay to go ahead with this upload to unstable, > > or whether

Re: Fixes for RT 3.x issue CVE-2011-0009 in testing: preapproval requested

2011-01-20 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 08:39:12AM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > I attach the full interdiff for review. Please could you let me > know whether it would be okay to go ahead with this upload to unstable, > or whether a targetted upload covering just the security fix will be > required, No, re

12971 filmas par 75 satimiem! Nu seksa filmas, protams!

2011-01-20 Thread Esmeralda Bek-Murzin
Izmet no sava kompjutera, simts reizes redzeto un neaktualo erotiko filmu kolekciju un piedalies ziemas porno (erotikas) izpardoshanaa!! Satriecoshi un vienlaikus neticami :- 8775 filmas par 75 santimiem.. Panem un pielade pilnu savu cieto disku ar superigu pornografiju! http://dirtydeal.biz.ly

Bug#610565: marked as done (unblock arrayprobe_2.0-3.1)

2011-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 20 Jan 2011 10:04:06 +0100 with message-id <20110120090406.gk30...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr> and subject line Re: Bug#610565: unblock arrayprobe_2.0-3.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #610565, regarding unblock arrayprobe_2.0-3.1 to be marked as done. This means that you cl

Fixes for RT 3.x issue CVE-2011-0009 in testing: preapproval requested

2011-01-20 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
Hello, A security issue in RT has been disclosed at A fix is included in version 3.8.8-7, which is ready to upload to unstable. This also includes some documentation fixes and a fix for one other important bug: *

Fixes for RT 3.x issue CVE-2011-0009

2011-01-20 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:50:58PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > Sorry, I got the timing wrong. It's tomorrow, Wednesday, that I believe > the planned release is. I'll email both you and the stable release > managers after then and we'll see where people are best placed. This issue has now be