Hi,
i'd need some tip about how to manage the situation with redmine package :
version 1.0.1-1 is in testing, version 1.0.5-1 in unstable (my bad, i should
have uploaded it to experimental).
I would like to see either redmine 1.0.5-1 go to testing, or backport the
security issues i'm aware of to a
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please consider unblocking package maelstrom.
The new version fixes FTBFS. However, this might not be that important
as it's non-free and not currently auto-built.
unblock maelstrom/1.4.3
tags 608187 + patch
thanks
The attached patch get xresprobe / ddcprobe to build again. It make
it possible to keep it for Squeeze. The patch is tested on
Linux/i686.
Happy hacking,
--
Petter Reinholdtsen
diff -ur xresprobe-0.4.23debian1/ddcprobe/lrmi.c
xresprobe-0.4.23debian1-pere/ddcprobe/lr
Your message dated Fri, 31 Dec 2010 18:25:33 +0100
with message-id <4d1e120d.8050...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#608503: unblock: brltty/4.2-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #608503,
regarding unblock: brltty/4.2-7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
On 12/31/2010 05:32 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
(Adding -release + Holger to Cc.)
Adam D. Barratt (30/12/2010):
On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 15:13 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
xresprobe FTBFS in a clean sid i386 chroot. Tail of the build log:
Given its upload history (or more accurately in recent times
Your message dated Fri, 31 Dec 2010 18:06:13 +0100
with message-id <4d1e0d85.9090...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#608494: unblock: libssh/0.4.5-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #608494,
regarding unblock: libssh/0.4.5-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
[Cyril Brulebois]
> Depending on what you need, read-edid (through its get-edid binary)
> might help you get what you need? Or ddccontrol, or whatever. Not
> sure what your testsuite needs.
Have looked at read-edid, and it was useless, but have not tried
ddccontrol. The testsuite in debian-edu-co
Your message dated Fri, 31 Dec 2010 18:00:05 +0100
with message-id <4d1e0c15.3050...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#608487: unblock: anjuta/2:2.32.0.0-5
anjuta-extras/2.32.0.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #608487,
regarding unblock: anjuta/2:2.32.0.0-5 anjuta-extras/2.32.0.0-3
to be ma
(Adding -release + Holger to Cc.)
Adam D. Barratt (30/12/2010):
> On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 15:13 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > xresprobe FTBFS in a clean sid i386 chroot. Tail of the build log:
>
> Given its upload history (or more accurately in recent times, its
> lack of the same), Julien suggeste
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 03:55:21PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 15:55:24 -0800
> Jorge Moraleda wrote:
>
>
> > 3) The README.debian file now calls to execute "make" to build all
> > examples.
>
> That's a separate bug. It doesn't affect the -dbg package which is
> meant fo
severity 608347 minor
quit
On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 15:55:24 -0800
Jorge Moraleda wrote:
> 1) For source code we will use one of the examples that come with the
> library. To obtain the example install package tbb-examples.
I was looking for a standalone C file to be used as a test case, as
original
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package brltty, there is a race between braille detection
and framebuffer use, this should mitigate it enough for Squeeze without
invasive changes.
brltty (4.2-7) unstable; u
Hi,
It's suitable for release or not, I'll follow your decision, Adam.
I just tried to squash RC bug to help releasing Squeeze.
On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 13:25:55 -
"Adam D. Barratt" wrote:
> Despite apparent active upstream development (the last release was a
> little over two weeks ago) the D
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 02:55:09PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 11:48:30AM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > I've cherry-picked all of the required changes and put them here for
> > your approval (diff also attached against debian/sbuild-0.60.0-2):
> > http://git.debian
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 11:48:30AM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> I've cherry-picked all of the required changes and put them here for
> your approval (diff also attached against debian/sbuild-0.60.0-2):
> http://git.debian.org/?p=buildd-tools/sbuild.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/sbuild-squeeze
bi
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Severity: normal
Hi,
Could you please unblock libssh/0.4.5-3 that fix bug #606347.
The patch is taken from upstream and according to them:
"this patch is 100% safe and needed". It's also included
Hello,
Thanks for your attention to wiliki package. I'm sorry that I was
unaware of this unblock request by Yamane-san and submitted another as
#608462...
I admit this package has been of very low activity and left untouched
for quite a long time due to my laziness, but I believe a certain
numbe
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Hi,
please unblock anjuta and anjuta-extras for the last batch of upstream
bugfixes for the 2.x series.
anjuta (2:2.32.0.0-5) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Pick more patches in
On 12/31/2010 12:05 AM, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> (In fact I'm already prepping a fix which includes your patch along
> with a AMD64 FTBS fix, albeit a 32-bit one.)
>
I'm not sure that we will be able to unblock your uploaded version.
It bumps compat to 8 and rewrites debian/rul
Your message dated Fri, 31 Dec 2010 10:18:55 +0100
with message-id <4d1d9fff.9030...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#608462: unblock: wiliki/0.5.3-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #608462,
regarding unblock: wiliki/0.5.3-1.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
20 matches
Mail list logo
