On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 01:22 -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> Please unblock package flickcurl
If it had been uploaded... :)
> It fixes a missing dependency; libflickcurl-dev needs to depend on
> libraptor1-dev. Patch attached.
Please go ahead, and let us know once the package has been accepted.
Re
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package flickcurl
It fixes a missing dependency; libflickcurl-dev needs to depend on
libraptor1-dev. Patch attached.
Please let me know if some changes seem incorre
Hi, Julien.
2010/11/2 Julien Cristau :
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 09:38:27 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
>
>> Hi, Mehdi.
>>
>> I pickuped patches from 4.67 and backport to 4.66.
>> All patches are bug fixes. These revise an existing problem. The
>> contents are as follows.
>>
>> bluez (4.66-2) te
Processing changes file: nss_3.12.3.1-0lenny2_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nss_3.12.3.1-0lenny2_alpha.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nss_3.12.3.1-0lenny2_arm.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nss_3.12.3.1-0lenny2_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
retitle 602041 unblock: arduino/0018+dfsg-6
thanks
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Your message and changelog say /usr/lib/java, the diff says
> /usr/lib/jni. Which is it?
The changelog is wrong, the diff is correct. /usr/lib/jni is what the
LD_LIBRARY_PATH should be set
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 602041 unblock: arduino/0018+dfsg-6
Bug #602041 [release.debian.org] unblock: arduino/0018+dfsg-5
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: arduino/0018+dfsg-6' from 'unblock:
arduino/0018+dfsg-5'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact m
On Mon, 1 Nov 2010, Harald Jenny wrote:
sorry to disturb you but it seems like a month has passed and the situation is
still unclear.
'Tis now on the correct track, finally.
Trying to contact you in private seems to fail so I was forced
to use this way.
Fail? How? I checked my logs (back t
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 09:38:27 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> Hi, Mehdi.
>
> I pickuped patches from 4.67 and backport to 4.66.
> All patches are bug fixes. These revise an existing problem. The
> contents are as follows.
>
> bluez (4.66-2) testing; urgency=low
>
> * Update debian/bluez.
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 16:43:07 +0200, Cesare Tirabassi wrote:
> Can you please consider granting an exception and eventually unblock
> conky-1.8.1?
> This is primarily a maintenance release which underwent quite a
> lengthy feature freeze, with a few important bug fixes.
Could we get just the f
On Mo, 01 Nov 2010, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Unblocked.
Thanks Julien.
Best wishes
Norbert
Norbert Preiningprein...@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debi
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 22:56 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> netbase (4.43) unstable; urgency=medium
>
> * etc-services: added nbd (10809/tcp), epmd (4369).
> (Closes: #591568, #599526)
Unblocked.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subj
Hi,
Many apologies for letting this keep slipping down my to-do list.
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 14:24 +0200, Dario Minnucci wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> On 08/25/2010 08:53 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-07-18 at 17:33 +0200, Dario Minnucci wrote:
[...]
> >> +case "$1" in
> >> + start)
> >>
netbase (4.43) unstable; urgency=medium
* etc-services: added nbd (10809/tcp), epmd (4369).
(Closes: #591568, #599526)
-- Marco d'Itri Sat, 23 Oct 2010 01:40:49 +0200
--
ciao,
Marco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Dnia 2010-10-23, sob o godzinie 16:37 +0100, Adam D. Barratt pisze:
> To be entirely honest, given that the package has only ever had one
> upload (in July) and has no reverse-dependencies I'm not sure right now
> whether fixing it or removing it from testing would be the best
> solution.
Hello.
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 09:13:19PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
[..]
> Hrm, except now there's a window where gid root has write access. Which
> it isn't supposed to have, afaik.
Right. Will change it then to 750.
-S
couchdb (0.11.0-2.3) unstable; urgency=high
* Non-maintainer upload.
* d
Hi,
I'd like to upload xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.13.0-2, mainly for
documentation reasons. Currently, we have in sid/squeeze a snapshot
from upstream, namely: 2:2.12.0+shadow-2. There were only a few
commits upstream between what we merged and 2.13.0; a full git log is
attached as upstream.diff
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 16:18:07 -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> The security team is not interested in doing a DSA to fix the
> CVE-2010-3364, but since I already prepared a diff for stable, maybe
> you'd be interested it including it in a stable point release. Though
> actually, this is not real
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:31:21 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> Uploaded. Only shorewall.
>
Unblocked.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 21:11:31 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 20:48:07 +0100, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
>
> > Hi Julien,
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 06:44:56PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > This makes those 3 directories world-readable. Is that ok (I have no
>
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 20:48:07 +0100, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> Hi Julien,
>
> On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 06:44:56PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > This makes those 3 directories world-readable. Is that ok (I have no
> > idea what perms the files in them have, or how confidential they are)?
>
Hi Julien,
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 06:44:56PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> This makes those 3 directories world-readable. Is that ok (I have no
> idea what perms the files in them have, or how confidential they are)?
It's OK for /etc/couchdb, only local.ini there merits read protection
accordi
Great! Thanks a lot!
// Ola
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 06:49:03PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 21:35 +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > I'm now re-requesting to unblock vzctl.
> >
> > I have uploaded an updated version with a correction to the problem
> > you noted. This corr
Your message dated Mon, 1 Nov 2010 20:32:14 +0100
with message-id <20101101193214.gx4...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#601970: Permission to upload tk8.4
has caused the Debian Bug report #601970,
regarding Permission to upload tk8.4
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Le lundi 01 nov. 2010 à 20:13:31 (+0100), Julien Cristau a écrit :
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 20:05:52 +0100, Julien Valroff wrote:
>
> > Le lundi 01 nov. 2010 à 19:30:16 (+0100), Julien Cristau a écrit :
> > > On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 14:17:52 +0200, Julien Valroff wrote:
> > >
> > > > I attach a
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>
> In non-X environment either tk8.4 shouldn't be pulled in or it shouldn't
> pull in an X terminal emulator at all.
tk8.4 is useless without X, so I guess it's better to file a bugreport
to foo2zjs
which provides a printer driver, to weake
Your message dated Mon, 1 Nov 2010 20:21:00 +0100
with message-id <20101101192100.gw4...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#602124: unblock: iso-codes/3.22-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #602124,
regarding unblock: iso-codes/3.22-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Mon, 1 Nov 2010 20:13:31 +0100
with message-id <20101101191331.gv4...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#595609: unblock: mailgraph/1.14-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #595609,
regarding unblock: mailgraph/1.14-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 595609
Bug #595609 {Done: Julien Valroff } [release.debian.org]
unblock: mailgraph/1.14-3
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
> thanks
Stopping proc
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 22:02:59 +0300, Sergei Golovan wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >>
> > NAK. xterm has 48k popcon installations, xvt has 220. I don't think
> > this change makes sense.
>
> Well, if any terminal emulator is already installed then this chan
Le lundi 01 nov. 2010 à 19:30:16 (+0100), Julien Cristau a écrit :
> On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 14:17:52 +0200, Julien Valroff wrote:
>
> > I attach a diff to update the Finnish Debconf translation. I have also
> > changed the maintainer field to myself (I have taken over the package).
> >
> > diffs
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>
> NAK. xterm has 48k popcon installations, xvt has 220. I don't think
> this change makes sense.
Well, if any terminal emulator is already installed then this change will never
pull xvt. Though if tk8.4 is itself installed via recommended
Your message dated Mon, 01 Nov 2010 19:02:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#595609: fixed in mailgraph 1.14-1.4squeeze1
has caused the Debian Bug report #595609,
regarding unblock: mailgraph/1.14-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Your message dated Mon, 01 Nov 2010 18:57:19 +
with message-id <1288637839.17085.182.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#602080: unblock: nfoview/1.9.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #602080,
regarding unblock: nfoview/1.9.2-1
to be marked as done.
This means that
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
Please unblock package iso-codes, which provides translation updates and
an update of one XML data file.
unblock iso-codes/3.22-1
Regards,
Tobias
--
Tobias Quathamer | If God had really
Your message dated Mon, 1 Nov 2010 19:56:57 +0100
with message-id <20101101185657.gs4...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#602054: unblock: sunflow/0.07.2.svn396+dfsg-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #602054,
regarding unblock: sunflow/0.07.2.svn396+dfsg-6
to be marked as done.
Th
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 22:41:59 -0400, Ralph Amissah wrote:
> Severity: normal
>
> Please unblock sisu 2.7.8 for Squeeze.
>
Done.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Mon, 01 Nov 2010 18:53:31 +
with message-id <1288637611.17085.168.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#601865: unblock: moodle/1.9.9.dfsg2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #601865,
regarding unblock: moodle/1.9.9.dfsg2-2
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Mon, 1 Nov 2010 19:54:47 +0100
with message-id <20101101185447.gq4...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#601820: RM: ntop/3:3.3-14
has caused the Debian Bug report #601820,
regarding RM: ntop/3:3.3-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 17:27:59 +0100, Dario Minnucci wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package mantis
>
> Includes updated (vi.po) translation
>
> unblock mantis/1.1.8+dfsg-10
>
Unbloc
Your message dated Mon, 01 Nov 2010 18:50:43 +
with message-id <1288637443.17085.155.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#601987: unblock: mantis/1.1.8+dfsg-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #601987,
regarding unblock: mantis/1.1.8+dfsg-10
to be marked as done.
This
On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 21:35 +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> I'm now re-requesting to unblock vzctl.
>
> I have uploaded an updated version with a correction to the problem
> you noted. This correction was not enough though. So I have applied a few
> more things.
>
> 1) The init script return with
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 15:39:03 +0300, Sergei Golovan wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi release team!
>
> I'd like to upload tk8.4 with the following three changes:
>
> 1) Reduce indirect dependencies by replacing xvt for xterm in recommends.
>Since recommends
Your message dated Mon, 01 Nov 2010 18:43:10 +
with message-id <1288636992.17085.79.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#602116: unblock: magics++/2.10.0.dfsg-5.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #602116,
regarding unblock: magics++/2.10.0.dfsg-5.1
to be marked as done.
Quoting Marco d'Itri (m...@linux.it):
> On Nov 01, Christian PERRIER wrote:
>
> > May I ask you what are your plans about futher uploads of udev?
> Uploads with new translations and bug fixes will continue as usual.
> I have been away a few days, I will upload 164-2 soon.
Good news. Thanks for y
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 14:26:26 -0700, John Stamp wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Bug#598294: lastfm: CVE-2010-3362: insecure library loading also affects
> the version in stable. I notified the security team, but Moritz told me
> that this does not warrant a DSA. He suggested that I instead get this
> fi
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 14:17:52 +0200, Julien Valroff wrote:
> I attach a diff to update the Finnish Debconf translation. I have also
> changed the maintainer field to myself (I have taken over the package).
>
> diffstat output:
> changelog |7 +++
> control |2 +-
> po/fi.po |
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 15:31:05 +0100, Adrian Knoth wrote:
> Is there anything you particularly don't like about the new package that
> would prevent it from entering testing?
>
I don't like that I need to spend more than 5 seconds reviewing an "add
a Provides" change.
Cheers,
Julien
signatur
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 14:11:53 -0500, Charlie Smotherman wrote:
> Uploaded
>
For the record: mehdi unblocked this.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 11:12:25 +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> > I guess this is one of the cornercases where we have to sacrifice
> > an improvement in a small corner in order to improve the larger good
> > (i.e. get out the release without unnecessary delays and risk for the
> > quality).
> What are
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package magics++. It fixes CVE-2010-3393
unblock magics++/2.10.0.dfsg-5.1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unst
On Nov 01, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> May I ask you what are your plans about futher uploads of udev?
Uploads with new translations and bug fixes will continue as usual.
I have been away a few days, I will upload 164-2 soon.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Mon, 1 Nov 2010 19:01:20 +0100
with message-id <20101101180120.gk4...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#601964: unblock: jxplorer/3.2.1+dfsg-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #601964,
regarding unblock: jxplorer/3.2.1+dfsg-4
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Mon, 1 Nov 2010 18:53:54 +0100
with message-id <20101101175354.gj4...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#601904: unblock: libjfreechart-java/1.0.13-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #601904,
regarding unblock: libjfreechart-java/1.0.13-3
to be marked as done.
This
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 20:27:06 +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> +ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),ia64)
> + BINARIES = acpixtract acpidump madt
> + MANPAGES = acpixtract madt
> +else
> + BINARIES = acpixtract acpidump turbostat madt
> + MANPAGES = acpixtract turbostat madt
> +endif
> +
Looks
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:02:01 +0100, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> diff -Nurp couchdb-0.11.0.orig//debian/postinst couchdb-0.11.0/debian/postinst
> --- couchdb-0.11.0.orig//debian/postinst 2010-10-30 16:06:12.0
> +0200
> +++ couchdb-0.11.0/debian/postinst2010-10-30 16:06:36.
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 12:15:48 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Do you plan to upload 164-2 to unstable at some time in a near future
> and then ask for an unblock (though this is a new upstream)? Or would
> you upload 163-3 with these updates in case 164 is not suitable for
> squeeze?
>
164 s
Your message dated Mon, 1 Nov 2010 18:33:16 +0100
with message-id <20101101173316.gf4...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#602025: unblock: backupninja/0.9.8.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #602025,
regarding unblock: backupninja/0.9.8.1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 02:03:37PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 17:33:10 +0200, Christoph Goehre wrote:
>
> > I've attached my changes. Could someone of the Release Team have a look
> > at my changes and make a decision to insert these changes into Squeeze?
> > If so, I'l
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 15:48:43 +0100, Michal Čihař wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'd like to get freeze exception for just uploaded rpm 4.8.1-6 which
> fixes #601993.
>
> The changelog is obviously short:
>
> rpm (4.8.1-6) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * Make librpm-dev conflict/replace librpm4.4 (Closes: #
Your message dated Mon, 1 Nov 2010 18:10:12 +0100
with message-id <20101101171012.gc4...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#601939: Request for freeze exception for libclamunrar
0.96.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #601939,
regarding Request for freeze exception for libclamunrar
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 00:53:32 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Dear release managers,
>
> I know o is late in the release cycle but I would like to get
> two very small fixes into squeeze for maildir-utils:
>
Unblocked.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
[...]
> >
> > As a freeze exception was requested for clamav (#601900), I'd also ask for
> > such
> > an exception for non-free libclamunrar 0.96.4-1 to have matching versions in
> > squeeze. Now clearly a freeze exception for libclamunrar depends on one
> > being
> > granted for clamav. Of cou
Dear release managers,
I know o is late in the release cycle but I would like to get
two very small fixes into squeeze for maildir-utils:
The changes are as follows:
* fix broken search of msgids, patch by Benjamin Mako Hill
(closes: #601072) (included upstream)
This change, implemented with q
Hi
I'd like to get freeze exception for just uploaded rpm 4.8.1-6 which
fixes #601993.
The changelog is obviously short:
rpm (4.8.1-6) unstable; urgency=low
* Make librpm-dev conflict/replace librpm4.4 (Closes: #601993).
-- Michal Čihař Mon, 01 Nov 2010 15:30:00 +0100
Thanks, please CC o
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:24:32 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Hi Sylvestre,
>
> Sorry, didn't see this note until now. You're probably right, that
> should be the cause.
>
> This confirms that a binNMU of scalapack should fix this bug (should
> have subscribed to it). The maintainer hasn't
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 02:37:37PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Please unblock package jackd2
> >
> > This version contains a small but important change: libjack-jackd2-dev now
> > "Provides: libjack-dev".
> >
> If that's the one change you want to see in testing, then you should
> have uplo
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 09:21:13 +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
>
> Hi release team,
>
> As a freeze exception was requested for clamav (#601900), I'd also ask for
> such
> an exception for non-free libclamunrar 0.96.4-1 to have matching versions in
> squeeze. No
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 601939 + moreinfo
Bug #601939 [release.debian.org] Request for freeze exception for libclamunrar
0.96.4-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
601939: http://bugs.debian.org
Hi Sylvestre,
Sorry, didn't see this note until now. You're probably right, that
should be the cause.
This confirms that a binNMU of scalapack should fix this bug (should
have subscribed to it). The maintainer hasn't replied, so can the
release team take care of this before squeeze? It's causi
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 17:30:38 +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
> Please unblock package jackd2
>
> This version contains a small but important change: libjack-jackd2-dev now
> "Provides: libjack-dev".
>
If that's the one change you want to see in testing, then you should
have uploaded a package wit
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:10:01 +0200, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
> Dear Release Managers,
>
> during Summer I adopted the orphaned library package "twofish"
> and I extended it to build also a shared library as well as
> providing the very first documentation in the form of Docbook
> source for
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 601219
Bug#601219: unblock pyxplot/0.8.3-1
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Stuart Prescott
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 12:11:25 -0400, Scott Howard wrote:
> Arduino won't start if users have sun-java installed. This is a bug in the
> sun-
> java jre. See Debian bug 382686. Since we cannot edit those binaries, I
> uploaded a two line work around that sets LD_LIBRARY_PATH in the arduino
> wr
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 20:41:21 +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> Op 26-10-10 20:14, Julien Cristau schreef:
> > On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 20:00:35 +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> >
> >> +#if (GTK_MAJOR_VERSION <= 2 && GTK_MINOR_VERSION <= 18 &&
> >> GTK_MICRO_VERSION < 2)
> >> GtkWidget *button;
> >>
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 23:14:44 +0100, Stuart Prescott wrote:
>
> Dear release team,
>
> I would like to request a freeze exception for version 0.8.3-1 of pyxplot to
> enter squeeze. It is primarily a bugfix release from upstream with a couple
> of slight changes to functionality. It would be
Your message dated Mon, 1 Nov 2010 14:10:47 +0100
with message-id <20101101131047.gp4...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#600458: unblock: nss-pam-ldapd/0.7.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #600458,
regarding unblock: nss-pam-ldapd/0.7.12
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 17:33:10 +0200, Christoph Goehre wrote:
> I've attached my changes. Could someone of the Release Team have a look
> at my changes and make a decision to insert these changes into Squeeze?
> If so, I'll upload a new version of mini-dinstall into unstable very
> shortly.
>
L
Your message dated Mon, 1 Nov 2010 13:58:42 +0100
with message-id <20101101125842.gn4...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#599307: unblock: jblas/1.1.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #599307,
regarding unblock: jblas/1.1.1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Your message dated Mon, 1 Nov 2010 13:52:18 +0100
with message-id <20101101125218.gl4...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#602082: unblock: slepc/3.0.0-p7.dfsg-7.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #602082,
regarding unblock: slepc/3.0.0-p7.dfsg-7.1
to be marked as done.
This means t
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 23:44:16 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> This has been fixed now in 3.6.2.0-4 (#600170). Please consider an unblock.
>
Unblocked by Mehdi.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package slepc.
The previous version of libslepc3.0.0 on most architectures does not
contain the shared library it should (#595396).
unblock slepc/3.0.0-p7.dfsg-7.1
-- Syste
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package nfoview, it brings new translations only.
I also moved myself to the Uploaders field just to comply with PAPT team's
policy [1] (I'd prefer let the package handled co
Hello Marco,
May I ask you what are your plans about futher uploads of udev?
163-1 then 163-2 made their way to testing and 164-1 was uploaded to
unstable (but has no unblock request as of now).
Meanwhile a few debconf translation updates (for that important new
templates recently introduced) ar
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
Dear release folks,
Please unblock package couchdb to allow NMU 0.11.0-2.2, which fixes #600061.
Here are the debdiff and interdiff outputs:
debdiff output:
Files in second .deb but not
On 11/01/2010 01:21 AM, gregor herrmann wrote:
>
> JFTR: bti would already (build-)depend on it if it had been around
> longer :)
>
Sure :)
> (In fact I have a package ready with the new upstream release of bti
> which uses liboauth).
>
>>> libOAuth was accepted very recently into Debian Unst
Your message dated Mon, 01 Nov 2010 10:17:33 +0100
with message-id <4cce85ad.4010...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#597951: unblock: ibus-array/0.0.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #597951,
regarding unblock: ibus-array/0.0.2-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package dbmail
The new version currently in unstable fixes quite a few bugs. The new
upstream release is a maintanance-only bugfix-only release.
* upstream release
* add Da
87 matches
Mail list logo
