Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package zekr-quran-translations-en
This version adds debconf translations.
unblock zekr-quran-translations-en/1.1.dfsg-2.2
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/si
On Friday, October 22, 2010 04:29:36 pm Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 10/18/2010 10:42 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > As discussed on IRC, python3-ipaddr is a new package that we'd like
> > to see get into squeeze in order to improve Python3 support in the
> > release.
>
> I'm not aware of that discuss
On 22 October 2010 at 22:40, Erik Schanze wrote:
| Hi Martin,
|
| I'm still interested in having Afio in Squeeze, but I think
| we had done all possible to find out the meaning of the
| original author and have now a long discussion for this issue.
| Unfortunately I have no news on this.
|
| I'm
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package insighttoolkit
Revision -5 renames a file to prevent a file conflict
on upgrade of the insighttoolkit shared lib package.
* rules: Embed SOVERSION in valgrind sup
Dear Release Team,
Please remove quickplay from testing. Upstream is essentially dead
and has no plans of updating the code even though he has been
contacted several times about fixing bugs that are not listed in the
BTS. This removal will also make room for the Viridian player which
does the sam
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 23:26 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> Ernesto, Nathan, do you have objections against removing
> libxml-rsslite-perl from testing? It has one RC bug (#600806),
> another one that makes it not really trustworthy (#443629), no
> rdepends and a low popcorn value.
I did the initi
On 10/23/2010 01:19 AM, Ernesto Hernández-Novich wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 23:26 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
>> Ernesto, Nathan, do you have objections against removing
>> libxml-rsslite-perl from testing? It has one RC bug (#600806),
>> another one that makes it not really trustworthy (#443
"Adam D. Barratt" writes:
> On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 23:24 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>> libapache-authenhook-perl logs passwords in Apache's error.log if the
>> log level is >= info[1]. I prepared an update for Lenny including the
>> same patch used for testing/unstable (already unblocked[2] as
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 600032 normal
Bug #600032 {Done: Mehdi Dogguy } [release.debian.org]
unblock: cloog-ppl 0.15.9-2
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
600032: http://bu
Your message dated Sat, 23 Oct 2010 00:43:33 +0200
with message-id <4cc21395@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#599510: future unblock: alsa-lib/1.0.23-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #599510,
regarding future unblock: alsa-lib/1.0.23-2.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sat, 23 Oct 2010 00:41:24 +0200
with message-id <4cc21314.2030...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#600492: unblock: fetchmail/6.3.18-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #600492,
regarding unblock: fetchmail/6.3.18-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Sat, 23 Oct 2010 00:38:55 +0200
with message-id <4cc2127f.8060...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#601010: please unblock openclipart/0.18+dfsg-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #601010,
regarding please unblock openclipart/0.18+dfsg-10
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Your message dated Sat, 23 Oct 2010 00:33:46 +0200
with message-id <4cc2114a.3030...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#600406: unblock: hexer/0.1.5-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #600406,
regarding unblock: hexer/0.1.5-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Sat, 23 Oct 2010 00:31:53 +0200
with message-id <4cc210d9.3040...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#599752: unblock: mnogosearch/3.3.8-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #599752,
regarding unblock: mnogosearch/3.3.8-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 12:06:52AM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 10/22/2010 08:55 PM, Joel Roth wrote:
> > Hi Mehdi / Release Team
> >
> > I am resending this.
> >
>
> I didn't receive the first one and I don't know why. Anyway…
>
> > I need to make a one-line patch to nama
> > to fix a criti
Your message dated Sat, 23 Oct 2010 00:28:41 +0200
with message-id <4cc21019.9010...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#599349: unblock: xsynth-dssi/0.9.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #599349,
regarding unblock: xsynth-dssi/0.9.2-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
On 09/24/2010 08:58 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 21:16 +0800, Keng-Yu Lin wrote:
>> Please unblock package ibus-array
>>
>> This version of ibus-array in unstable fixes bug #596975, which is
>> that ibus-array crashes with libibus2.
>
> The new version of ibus-array also mo
Your message dated Sat, 23 Oct 2010 00:15:02 +0200
with message-id <4cc20ce6.3000...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#597893: please unblock xdotool 1:2.20100701-2961-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #597893,
regarding please unblock xdotool 1:2.20100701-2961-3
to be marked as done.
This mea
Your message dated Sat, 23 Oct 2010 00:12:56 +0200
with message-id <4cc20c68.8070...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#597880: unblock: python-stdlib-extensions/2.6.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #597880,
regarding unblock: python-stdlib-extensions/2.6.6-1
to be marked as done.
This means
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 23:28 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 10/14/2010 08:44 AM, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> > Hello. Bug 585591 renders iputils-arping pretty much useless. I just
> > uploaded version 3:20100418-3 to unstable to address this issue. The
> > patch, which has also been incorporated ups
On 10/22/2010 08:55 PM, Joel Roth wrote:
> Hi Mehdi / Release Team
>
> I am resending this.
>
I didn't receive the first one and I don't know why. Anyway…
> I need to make a one-line patch to nama
> to fix a critical shell-syntax issue
> for default squeeze installation
> with /bin/dash as sy
Your message dated Sat, 23 Oct 2010 00:01:31 +0200
with message-id <4cc209bb.6020...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#600087: unblock: grass/6.4.0~rc6+42329-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #600087,
regarding unblock: grass/6.4.0~rc6+42329-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
On 10/14/2010 08:44 AM, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> Hello. Bug 585591 renders iputils-arping pretty much useless. I just
> uploaded version 3:20100418-3 to unstable to address this issue. The
> patch, which has also been incorporated upstream, is straightforward.
> It is attached for review. Please
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 23:02:42 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 10/22/2010 02:26 PM, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
> > 1.) It would be easier for me if you deleted this package from
> > squeeze and I just submitted 0.15+dfsg-1 into unstable with no
> > unblock.
> I could do that but… who's the actual main
On 10/22/2010 02:26 PM, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
> Mehdi, The following occur to me:
>
> 1.) It would be easier for me if you deleted this package from
> squeeze and I just submitted 0.15+dfsg-1 into unstable with no
> unblock.
>
I could do that but… who's the actual maintainer of that package?
Hi Martin,
I'm still interested in having Afio in Squeeze, but I think
we had done all possible to find out the meaning of the
original author and have now a long discussion for this issue.
Unfortunately I have no news on this.
I'm still convinced that Afio is Free software even if
the 25 years o
On 10/18/2010 10:42 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
> As discussed on IRC, python3-ipaddr is a new package that we'd like
> to see get into squeeze in order to improve Python3 support in the
> release.
I'm not aware of that discussion on IRC. So, I don't know what you are
talking about.
> I'd also
On 10/22/2010 5:35 AM, Guillem Jover wrote:
> 1) Switch back from sync() to fsync() before rename() (while keeping
Don't you WANT to use sync? If you fsync every file that is going to be
rather slow since it forces a disk write for every file, rather than
allowing writes between each file to be
On 10/22/2010 08:50 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>
> I have to admit that I noticed too late that the rc3 version didn't
> make it to testing because of the missing build; I just assumed rc3
> was already in and don't really remember what exactly changed.
> However, I do remember (several) FTBFS
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 18:02:03 (CEST), Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 16/10/2010 11:18, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> While boxbackup was ready at freeze time, unfortuntately, I didn't
>> notice that it didn't migrate at that time because of a missing build
>> on armel. The FTBFS is caus
Hi,
On Tue Sep 14, 2010 at 14:24:29 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> This mail should be sent to the debian-release mailing list, copying in.
>
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:32:57AM +0200, Erik Schanze wrote:
> > please let me kindly ask for setting squeeze-ignore tag for
> > serious Bug #509287.
>
Hi Mehdi / Release Team
I am resending this.
I need to make a one-line patch to nama
to fix a critical shell-syntax issue
for default squeeze installation
with /bin/dash as system shell.
The current syntax is incompatible with dash.
c.f. Bug#599693.
Specifically for file lib/Audio/Nama.pm, li
Your message dated Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:37:58 +0100
with message-id <1287765478.16686.6194.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#600686: unblock: libproxy/0.3.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #600686,
regarding unblock: libproxy/0.3.1-2
to be marked as done.
This means t
Your message dated Fri, 22 Oct 2010 18:18:51 +0200
with message-id <4cc1b96b.6020...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#600702: unblock: cvsweb/3:3.0.6-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #600702,
regarding unblock: cvsweb/3:3.0.6-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Fri, 22 Oct 2010 18:17:13 +0200
with message-id <4cc1b909.9040...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#597788: unblock: hyperestraier/1.4.13-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #597788,
regarding unblock: hyperestraier/1.4.13-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:16:31 +0100
with message-id <1287764191.16686.6079.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#599246: unblock: hpcc/1.4.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #599246,
regarding unblock: hpcc/1.4.1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Fri, 22 Oct 2010 18:07:59 +0200
with message-id <4cc1b6df.5030...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#600841: unblock: qcad/2.050-1+090318-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #600841,
regarding unblock: qcad/2.050-1+090318-8
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Hello,
On penktadienis 22 Spalis 2010 18:53:42 Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 10/10/2010 14:38, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User:
> > release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception
> >
> > Please unblock package qimageblitz
> >
> > Well,
On 16/10/2010 11:18, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> While boxbackup was ready at freeze time, unfortuntately, I didn't
> notice that it didn't migrate at that time because of a missing build
> on armel. The FTBFS is caused by a wrong install pattern in
> debian/boxbackup-{client,server}.i
Your message dated Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:53:42 +0200
with message-id <4cc1b386.6030...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#599715: unblock: qimageblitz/1:0.0.6-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #599715,
regarding unblock: qimageblitz/1:0.0.6-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 23:24 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> libapache-authenhook-perl logs passwords in Apache's error.log if the
> log level is >= info[1]. I prepared an update for Lenny including the
> same patch used for testing/unstable (already unblocked[2] as well).
>
> The security team s
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:26:22 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> Sorry for not getting back to you sooner.
No problem, I know you are quite busy at the moment (and we wouldn't
have done anything before this weekend anyway).
> > - Create a patch against 0.09003 that contains only the necessary
> > ch
Hi,
Sorry for not getting back to you sooner.
On 16/10/2010 18:33, gregor herrmann wrote:
>
> The options I see now are:
> - Upload 0.09008 to unstable and unblock it; but I guess that doesn't
> conform to the current freeze policy due to the size of the diff.
> - Create a patch against 0.0900
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Owner: Miguel Ruiz
please unblock openclipart/0.18+dfsg-10
it fixes RC bug #589194
please note that openclipart is an orphan package
the output of both diffstat and debdiff is below
deb
Mehdi,
The following occur to me:
1.) It would be easier for me if you deleted this package from squeeze
and I just submitted 0.15+dfsg-1 into unstable with no unblock.
2.) I now recall trying out this module a few years ago and finding it
too buggy.
3.) If I looked at #443629 with no ot
On 22/10/2010 13:21, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
> Did you look at #443629?
>
You want me to remove it from Squeeze? I don't understand exactly what you
are expecting tbh (and the bug is there since ages).
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 at 20:24:54 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Sorry for the delay. The NMU diff looks reasonable to me, thanks. Let
> me know when it lands and I'll unblock the package.
ACCEPTED. Please do:
unblock alsa-lib/1.0.23-2.1
Thanks for herding the release process forward,
S
Your message dated Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:43:58 +0100
with message-id <1287747838.16686.4676.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#600998: unblock: proftpd-dfsg/1.3.3a-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #600998,
regarding unblock: proftpd-dfsg/1.3.3a-4
to be marked as done.
Th
Mehdi,
Did you look at #443629?
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 22/10/2010 11:50, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Mehdi,
If we are going with basing it off the current testing version ,
i.e. 0.11~dfsg-1 then the changes are
1.) Removing t/02rss.t, t/journal.rss and t/sampleRSS.xml
2.) Removing those
On 22/10/2010 11:50, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
> Mehdi,
> If we are going with basing it off the current testing version ,
> i.e. 0.11~dfsg-1 then the changes are
>
> 1.) Removing t/02rss.t, t/journal.rss and t/sampleRSS.xml
> 2.) Removing those lines from the MANIFEST file.
> 3) Adding debian/r
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package proftpd-dfsg ASAP:
This version fixes a security issue, as detailed in
http://bugs.proftpd.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3519
unblock proftpd-dfsg/1.3.3a-4
-- Syste
Mehdi,
It just occurs to me that you might like to take #443629 into
consideration as well. That is confirmed in both 0.11 and 0.15 and there
is no fix at present.
Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Mehdi,
If we are going with basing it off the current testing version ,
i.e. 0.11~dfsg-1 then the c
Mehdi,
If we are going with basing it off the current testing version ,
i.e. 0.11~dfsg-1 then the changes are
1.) Removing t/02rss.t, t/journal.rss and t/sampleRSS.xml
2.) Removing those lines from the MANIFEST file.
3) Adding debian/repack.* files to handle the above modifications
Needless
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 20:05 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 17:51 +0200, Devid Antonio Filoni wrote:
> > ATM python-papyon doesn't work due to changes in MSN servers (bug:
> > #600928), papyon 0.4.10 fixes this.
> >
> > CHANGELOG:
> > Fixes:
> > * Use the right policy refere
Hi!
I'd like to apply two patches for the next dpkg 1.15.8.6 upload. And
would like to run them through you to avoid having to possibly revert
them from dpkg's sid git branch.
Those are related to the fsync()/sync() changes in dpkg from some time
ago, the patches would:
1) Switch back from syn
On 10/22/2010 10:39 AM, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
> Over a year ago concerns over the license status of the test data in
> this package were raised internally within the Debian perl group.
> Unfortunately this seems to have had the effect of scaring anyone from
> looking at the package in more detail.
Over a year ago concerns over the license status of the test data in
this package were raised internally within the Debian perl group.
Unfortunately this seems to have had the effect of scaring anyone from
looking at the package in more detail.
There is now an RC bug report #600806. Can I assume
Hi!
On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 16:45:53 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Sorry for not getting back to you sooner.
Well, me too I guess, probably too late anyway.
> Are there any other distributions currently shipping 1.8?
The only other distributions I've found (after a cursory look)
shipping inetut
Your message dated Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:23:48 +0200
with message-id <4cc14a14.4070...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#600754: unblock: phpldapadmin/1.2.0.5-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #600754,
regarding unblock: phpldapadmin/1.2.0.5-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
On 10/19/2010 02:53 PM, Ralph Amissah wrote:
> Severity: normal
>
> Please unblock sisu-markup-samples 2.0.7 for Squeeze.
>
Unblocked.
> No package depends on sisu-markpup-samples and the changes which prepare the
> package for the release are without risk.
>
That's not a valid reason for an
Your message dated Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:19:25 +0200
with message-id <4cc1490d.5050...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#600774: unblock: pango1.0/1.28.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #600774,
regarding unblock: pango1.0/1.28.3-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:21:10 +0200
with message-id <4cc14976.7090...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#600768: unblock: totem-pl-parser/2.30.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #600768,
regarding unblock: totem-pl-parser/2.30.3-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
On 10/20/2010 10:43 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Hello Release Team,
>
> I have recently added the dkms feature to sysprof. The dkms feature
> is very good, in that, it allows automatic building, installation and
> removal for kernel modules on kernel installs/upgrades/removes.
>
> I think it i
On 10/21/2010 10:04 PM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> Is it OK to upload to unstable? We believe all the changes make
> sense (well, doh of course we do), but got some feedback on the fix
> for #595431 claiming it did not work. Not much more to say than
> that it work for us. :)
>
If the fi
Your message dated Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:53:24 +0200
with message-id <4cc142f4.1070...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#600964: unblock papyon/0.4.10-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #600964,
regarding unblock papyon/0.4.10-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:37:33 +0200
with message-id <4cc13f3d.6050...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#600967: unblock: initramfs-tools/0.98.5
has caused the Debian Bug report #600967,
regarding unblock: initramfs-tools/0.98.5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:36:18 +0200
with message-id <4cc13ef2.2090...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#600989: unblock: pam/1.1.1-6.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #600989,
regarding unblock: pam/1.1.1-6.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:36:18 +0200
with message-id <4cc13ef2.2090...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#600989: unblock: pam/1.1.1-6.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #600988,
regarding unblock: memtest86+/4.10-1.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:36:18 +0200
with message-id <4cc13ef2.2090...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#600989: unblock: pam/1.1.1-6.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #600987,
regarding unblock: ocsinventory-server/1.02.2-1.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:36:18 +0200
with message-id <4cc13ef2.2090...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#600989: unblock: pam/1.1.1-6.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #600986,
regarding unblock: nodm/0.7-1.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:36:18 +0200
with message-id <4cc13ef2.2090...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#600989: unblock: pam/1.1.1-6.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #600985,
regarding unblock: synce-serial/0.11-5.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:36:18 +0200
with message-id <4cc13ef2.2090...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#600989: unblock: pam/1.1.1-6.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #600984,
regarding unblock: mason/1.0.0-12.2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Mehdi,
Thanks.
The mentioned changes look ok. But, I noticed that there were several
files deleted from the source tarball. I realize that 0.1 contained some
cruft and 0.1+nmu1 fixed that (which is a good thing). If you have
several orig tarballs, you should use the source format 3.0 for thi
73 matches
Mail list logo
