You're timing is fine from my point of view Markus, this should be
enough time to fix for 10.10. We'll be in beta freeze for 10.10
for another week or so.
Upon importing the tarball into the ubuntu package, it builds
correctly with libdbi.1.0.0.so. I was also able to build libdbi-drivers,
includin
Dear Release Managers,
I would like to request you to unblock gworldclock to allow 1.4.4-8 into
squeeze.
I have finally been able to resolve a good number of outstanding bugs,
which will make the clock better behaved and easier for users to locate
in the archive. (There had been some bizarre loca
Clint Byrum writes:
> I believe all that is needed is to bump 'LIB_CURRENT' in configure.in from 0
> -> 1, and autoreconf.
Hi,
I hope it's not too late, but I've prepared a 0.8.4 test tarball:
http://libdbi.sourceforge.net/downloads/libdbi-0.8.4.tar.gz
This isn't officially released yet, but
Adam D. Barratt dijo [Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 07:19:51PM +0100]:
> On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 09:36 -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > I just uploaded mongrel-rails 1.0.5-5, which includes a IMO very small
> > but significative bug: [...] #594960, and users
> > starting the daemon from the command line can get
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 08:07 +1000, Mark Purcell wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 August 2010 08:34:38 Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 07:40 +1000, Mark Purcell wrote:
> > > Please remove egoboo from squeeze, it is currently incompatible with
> > > egoboo-data and neither are really release q
On Tuesday 24 August 2010 08:34:38 Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 07:40 +1000, Mark Purcell wrote:
> > Please remove egoboo from squeeze, it is currently incompatible with
> > egoboo-data and neither are really release quality.
>
> Does leaving egoboo-data in testing on its own mak
Processing changes file: sun-java6_6-20-0lenny1_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: sun-java5_1.5.0-22-0lenny1_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archiv
Hi,
there was just a security fix release for tryton-modules-stock.
It provides a security fix to prohibit evaluation of injected code
http://hg.tryton.org/1.6/modules/stock/rev/2f6ae3f40ce8
and a bug fix for inventory completion
http://hg.tryton.org/hgwebdir.cgi/1.6/modules/stock/rev/0af85e7aa3
On 2010-08-31, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> We would need to check how these packages use webkit, maybe they can be
> adapted.
I would really like if we could describe gtkwebkit as gtkwebkit, rather
than using 'webkit' (which is the common codebase used by gtk people, by
nokia/Qt, by chrome, by sa
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 20:59 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Coming back to the libjack binNMUs:
>
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 18:25:15 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
> > Looking at unstable and ignoring packages which have built successfully
> > and are simply missing uploads, the remaining package
Your message dated Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:07:05 +0100
with message-id
<1283281625.20757.691.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#595053: nmu: sdlgfx reverse deps
has caused the Debian Bug report #595053,
regarding nmu: sdlgfx reverse deps
to be marked as done.
This m
Am 31.08.2010 14:15, schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
On Mon, August 30, 2010 21:40, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
I have talked again with some kdenlive upstreams about the current
situation.
They are currently in a feature freeze and they plan to release in the
mid of september. But, as ago, the current cha
Your message dated Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:34:04 +0200
with message-id <20100831183403.gn3...@ftbfs.de>
and subject line unblock: kfreebsd*
has caused the Debian Bug report #595049,
regarding unblock: kfreebsd-kernel-di-amd64/0.4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Your message dated Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:34:04 +0200
with message-id <20100831183403.gn3...@ftbfs.de>
and subject line unblock: kfreebsd*
has caused the Debian Bug report #595048,
regarding unblock: kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386/0.4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:34:04 +0200
with message-id <20100831183403.gn3...@ftbfs.de>
and subject line unblock: kfreebsd*
has caused the Debian Bug report #595045,
regarding unblock: freebsd-utils/8.1-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Your message dated Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:34:04 +0200
with message-id <20100831183403.gn3...@ftbfs.de>
and subject line unblock: kfreebsd*
has caused the Debian Bug report #595044,
regarding unblock: freebsd-libs/8.1-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Coming back to the libjack binNMUs:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 18:25:15 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Looking at unstable and ignoring packages which have built successfully
> and are simply missing uploads, the remaining packages depending on just
> libjack0 are:
>
> - ardour: FTBFS on sparc (#5
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 20:00:12 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Version 2.0.19 of sdlgfx changed SONAME from libSDL_gfx.so.4 to
> libSDL_gfx.so.13, but didn't break ABI, so the package name was kept
> with a compat symlink for the old SONAME. Unfortunately the shlibs
> wasn't bumped, so reverse d
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 16:07 +0200, Jan Wagner wrote:
> On Wednesday, 18. August 2010, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Thanks for the reminder; please go ahead with the upload and let us know
> > once it's been accepted.
>
> php-suhosin 0.9.32.1-1 was uploaded and could be unblocked:
Unblocked.
Regard
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 09:36 -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> I just uploaded mongrel-rails 1.0.5-5, which includes a IMO very small
> but significative bug: [...] #594960, and users
> starting the daemon from the command line can get confused as a
> result.
You mean mongrel-cluster... unblocked.
Regar
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Version 2.0.19 of sdlgfx changed SONAME from libSDL_gfx.so.4 to
libSDL_gfx.so.13, but didn't break ABI, so the package name was kept
with a compat symlink for the old SONAME. Unfortunately t
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package kfreebsd-kernel-di-amd64
This source package only contains udebs for the kfreebsd-8 kernel on
amd64. It's a big update (7.2 to 8.1), but the kfreebsd-8 package used
t
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386
This source package only contains udebs for the kfreebsd-8 kernel on
i386. It's a big update (7.2 to 8.1), but the kfreebsd-8 package used
to
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package freebsd-utils
This new version doesn't introduce any code change, only a new binary in
a udeb and a translation update:
freebsd-utils (8.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package freebsd-libs
The squeeze package is 2 versions behind the unstable one. It fixes an
RC bug, and has otherwise minor changes (description, one more udebs):
freebsd-li
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 06:31:47PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 18:09:16 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>
> > Removal seems cleaner to me in general. An EOL announcement is necessary
> > anyway.
> >
> Removals from stable are anything but clean.
It's cleaner than leav
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 18:09:16 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Removal seems cleaner to me in general. An EOL announcement is necessary
> anyway.
>
Removals from stable are anything but clean.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 10:56:54AM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 08:49:54 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:01:37AM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > > The lenny webkit package has an insurmountable number of security
> > > vulnerabilities [0]. The ver
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 02:33:46 +0200, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On Sunday 29 August 2010 17:27:46 Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Well, if you want to see that stuff land in squeeze, then
> > system-config-printer-kde needs to be fixed in sid ASAP...
>
> Uploaded. Along with a rc bugfix in system-config-
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 02:35:17PM +0200, Michael Prokop wrote:
> Please approve fai 3.4.1 for squeeze.
>
Unblocked by luk
Neil
--
* stockholm calls netapp
* stockholm calls someone else
you are typing random numbers on your phone?
yes. my newest attempt to close our budget hole
signature.a
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 03:07:59PM +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 05:07:22PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:54:12PM -0400, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > Release team: if you think this bug makes runit-run unreleaseable,
> > > please indicate as such; ot
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 05:01:49PM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 16:34:01 +0200, Micha Lenk wrote:
> > I was not aware that there was a new goffice package uploaded to unstable
> > without an unblock request. Ray, was the upload intended for the Squeeze
> > release (an
Hi Micha,
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 16:34:01 +0200, Micha Lenk wrote:
> I was not aware that there was a new goffice package uploaded to unstable
> without an unblock request. Ray, was the upload intended for the Squeeze
> release (and you just forgot to ask Debian Release for a freeze exception)
>
Hi,
typo3-src 4.3.5-1 got uploaded last week, fixing a RC security bug.
Unfortunately the amount of changes over the version in testing [0] is a
bit high. I'm not comfortable reviewing that much php :/
Can you help explain the changes, and why we need that much this late?
[0] 256 files changed,
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 21:47:41 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> the Ubuntu issue was the lack of /lib/udev/hotplug.functions, which is
> pending in udev by [0], so I uploaded usb-modeswitch 1.1.4-1 and usb-
> modeswitch-data 20100826-1 to unstable.
>
Unblocked.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.
Hi,
I just uploaded mongrel-rails 1.0.5-5, which includes a IMO very small
but significative bug: For Debian, we renamed /etc/mongrel_rails to
/etc/mongrel-rails (following the package name), and included the two
customary directory (sites-available and sites-enabled) within
it. This change is ref
Processing changes file: openssl_0.9.8g-15+lenny8_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openssl_0.9.8g-15+lenny8_alpha.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openssl_0.9.8g-15+lenny8_arm.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openssl_0.9.8g-15+lenny8_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processin
Hello, release team!
I developed a simple patch for Sympa's RC bug
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=594119.
May I upload a package with this patch to testing-proposed-updates? The package
in unstable is not
suitable for this.
Regards
Racke
--
LinuXia Systems => http:
Hi Adam,
On Wednesday, 18. August 2010, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 20:48 +, Jan Wagner wrote:
> > On Friday, 13. August 2010, Jan Wagner wrote:
> > > On Thursday, 12. August 2010, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 10:12 +0200, Jan Wagner wrote:
> > > > Wh
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 15:34:28 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> the i10n 4.0.5-2 upload just reached unstable, after foomatic-filters
> 4.0.5-1 having already been 11 days in unstable without bugreport.
>
unblocked.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, August 31, 2010 14:53, Joost van Baal wrote:
> Could you please allow uruk 20100831-2 in squeeze?
Just to add a data point: we've been using this package (except the
documentation / update-rc.d improvements of today) for a while already in
production, both on IPv4-only and on IPv6
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 16:51:53 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
>
>> Foomatic-filters 4.0.5-1 has been uploaded to unstable, with the
>> dpkg-vendor thing removed. It's in sid for 3 days now. As said above, I'm
>> fine with anything >10 days if needed.
>>
> I see ther
Hi,
I've uploaded the version batman-adv-kernelland 2010.0.0-2 to unstable. It
fixes rc bugs #593471, #593472, #593519 and #593724 and the important bug
#593473. All those patches were already send to the Linux stable tree
maintainers and were accepted in 2.6.35.4.
A patch with all changes betwee
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:34:14 +0100, "Adam D. Barratt"
wrote:
> On Wed, August 25, 2010 18:52, Christian Kastner wrote:
>> I'd like to ask for a freeze exception for pyrit 3.0-2.
>
> Unblocked.
Thanks!
Christian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Hi,
Could you please allow uruk 20100831-2 in squeeze?
Op Tue 31 Aug 2010 om 01:25:12 +0200 schreef Joost van Baal:
>
> Mehdi Dogguy: thanks for your prompt reply.
>
> Op Fri 27 Aug 2010 om 03:15:46 +0200 schreef Mehdi Dogguy:
> > On 08/27/2010 01:55 PM, Jo
Hello,
I just uploaded gmp-ecm 6.2-2squeeze1 to t-p-u. This fixes bug
#580398. It can't go through unstable as unstable contains a newer
version, but which fails to build on sparc (investigation of this
bug is likely to expose a compiler issue in gcc-4.4.5, but I'd rather
fix this particular RC bu
On Wed, August 25, 2010 18:52, Christian Kastner wrote:
> I'd like to ask for a freeze exception for pyrit 3.0-2.
>
> It adds a patch provided by upstream fixing run-time detection of
> MMX/SSE2, and drops my patch (I simply disabled optimizations, pending
> resolution of the issue). It would be ni
Your message dated Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:21:05 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#594918: unblock: ltsp/5.2.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #594918,
regarding unblock: ltsp/5.2.4-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
On Mon, August 30, 2010 21:40, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> I have talked again with some kdenlive upstreams about the current
> situation.
> They are currently in a feature freeze and they plan to release in the
> mid of september. But, as ago, the current changeset is quite big to the
> version in s
* Luk Claes [Mon Aug 30, 2010 at 04:15:43PM +0200]:
> * Michael Prokop wrote:
> > Ok, 3.4.0 went through NEW (thanks) and I just uploaded 3.4.1 with
> > the mentioned bugfix to unstable.
> > Please approve fai 3.4.1 for squeeze.
> unblocked
Thanks!
regards,
-mika-
signature.asc
Description
Your message dated Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:09:43 +0100
with message-id
<7720d030dfdd0b5d5a8b9b55564e4fd9.squir...@adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#595005: unblock: speedy-cgi-perl/2.22-13
has caused the Debian Bug report #595005,
regarding unblock: speedy-cgi-perl/2.22-13
to be marked a
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package speedy-cgi-perl, it fixes a test suite
problem on big iron discovered by Lucas.
# Updating speedy-cgi-perl fixes old bugs: #584344
unblock speedy-cgi-perl/2.22-13
Hi,
Could you please allow uruk 20100831-1 in squeeze?
Mehdi Dogguy: thanks for your prompt reply.
Op Fri 27 Aug 2010 om 03:15:46 +0200 schreef Mehdi Dogguy:
> On 08/27/2010 01:55 PM, Joost van Baal wrote:
> >
> > Could you please allow uruk 20100823-1 in squeeze? It fixes pr
Hi Peter, hi all,
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:58 PM, Peter Leese
wrote:
> I was supplied the patch by a third party. His reasoning behind doing this
> way was that he did not want
> a random filename, but a filename that was related to the name used in the
> URL. If this failed (i.e
> 001- to 09
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 00:56:00 +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
>
>> Is there any other issue left that prevents 2.11.9's transition to Squeeze?
>>
> Yes, see my previous mail.
Can you point to specific aspects? I haven't been included i
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
This fixes an RC bug, #592679. The only other substantial changes are
making the test suite pass again following sun-revert-disk-flag.patch,
and FreeBSD changes requested by porters: the la
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 00:56:00 +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> Is there any other issue left that prevents 2.11.9's transition to Squeeze?
>
Yes, see my previous mail.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 06:35:48PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Then can you help with the second part of my question? I still don't
> think I can review a 16k lines diff, or an iso.
Well neither can I. I have no idea how to help you with a review. I can give
you details of the changes in the p
I want to fix up the documentation for svn-buildpackage so that it
translates more easily, then make a call for translations (a partial
French translation exists for the docs in svn) for the documentation /
manpages and the program output.
The diff for 0.8.2, when ready, will include lots of chang
59 matches
Mail list logo
