Re: Bug#593798: libsoqt3-20 is linked against Qt 4 (should be Qt 3)

On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 05:18:09PM +0100, David Claughton wrote: > FWIW, I could be wrong, but it looks like configure is invoking > pkgconfig to determine the QT version and it's always finding QT4 > regardless of what QTDIR is set to. > > Maybe --enable-pkgconfig wasn't the default in the previ

New version of inkscape to be released the next days

Dear release team, I am the maintainer of the inkscape vector graphics program and SVG editor. The inkscape project finished the release of version 0.48.0. The public announcement happened yesterday. During the last week, I prepared a package which was uploaded to experimental by my sponsor Guido

Bug#594152: unblock: psychopy/1.61.03.dfsg-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Please unblock package psychopy 1.61.03 is a bugfix release on top of upstream 1.61.02. 1.61.02.dfsg-2 (present in squeeze atm) already contained major fixes from 1.61.03, and 1

Bug#594151: unblock: nipype/0.3.2-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Please unblock package nipype 0.3 release (present in squeeze atm) was the first release in 0.3 series and upstream followed it up shortly with two bugfix releases: Release 0.3.1

Re: [v-admins] Bug#592506: What to do about libtest-harness-perl?

Okay a sleepless might so I have some conclusions. First of all any patched version needs to be based off 3.21 not 3.20 because the jump from 3.20 to 3.21 is really small and only affects test files. I extracted patch files for the suggested git commits. The total line count is 492 though I

Permission to upload bugfix release of geany

[sorry pkg-geany-team for the resend, but -release discarded the message with the attach] Hello RMs, Geany upstream released a bugfix release with some big bugs fixed that I think is worth including in Squeeze. Said bugs are: - An infinite loop in Markdown lexer - A segfault on Tools->Reload

Bug#594097: marked as done (unblock: fbi/2.07-5)

Your message dated Mon, 23 Aug 2010 23:46:05 +0100 with message-id <1282603565.21871.1177.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net> and subject line Re: Bug#594097: unblock: fbi/2.07-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #594097, regarding unblock: fbi/2.07-5 to be marked as done. This means that

Re: Gnash 0.8.8 has just been released - Asking for an exception to the freeze

On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 00:57, Miriam Ruiz wrote: >    * 100% of all YouTube videos should work. If you have problems, >      delete all YouTube cookies and refresh. Wow! So I'll finally get rid of flashplugin-nonfree? -- blog: http://tshepang.tumblr.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-rel

Bug#592697: unblock: java-common/0.40

On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 22:23 +0200, Torsten Werner wrote: > thanks for unblocking 0.39 but my upload did not work as expected > because the arch any packages got downgraded on mips. I have > introduced an epoch for the arch any packages now. The upload includes > the switch to openjdk on powerpcsce

Re: Releasability of the kFreeBSD ports

On Sun, 22 Aug 2010, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 22:41 +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > > > So, what do you think is still missing? What would we need to > > > > communicate > > > > as a disclaimer to the users if releasing kFreeBSD in this state? > [...] > > With my DSA ha

Re: RM: egoboo/testing -- ROM; incompatable with squeeze egoboo-data

On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 07:40 +1000, Mark Purcell wrote: > Please remove egoboo from squeeze, it is currently incompatible with > egoboo-data and neither are really release quality. Does leaving egoboo-data in testing on its own make any sense, or should both be removed? Regards, Adam -- To UNSU

Re: Xapian 1.2 for squeeze?

On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 11:09 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > The primary issue I can see is that the Xapian transition overlaps with > the apt transition. Both are in turn currently blocked by the fact that > aptitude FTBFS on s390. As mentioned on IRC, we're running the apt and xapian transitions

Meeting Minutes for the IRC Release Team Meeting on August 23, 2010

Hi there, those are the minutes of Monday's IRC meeting at #debian-release. 1) What will be the release architectures for squeeze? - sparc will be kept as a release architecture for now. The gcc code generation code which moved to v9/32bit has taken place in Nov 2009. There will be

Re: Request for pre-approval of cyrus-sasl2 upload

On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:06:56AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > is going to succeed even if configure doesn't. Should probably use > something like > > mkdir $(TMPBUILD_MIT) > cd $(TMPBUILD_MIT) && \ > LDFLAGS="$(LDFLAGS) -L/usr/lib/mit-krb5 -Wl,-z,defs" \ > C

Bug#579795: apt transition

On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 19:06 +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote: > 2010/8/21 Julien Cristau : > > We're (finally) getting ready to start this. Can you provide an outline > > of the changes you want to get in? > > Basically the package which is bumming around in experimental > plus a few bugfixes whic

Re: Request for pre-approval of cyrus-sasl2 upload

On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 15:36:50 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 02:28:37PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > > > Assuming that my explanations are satisfactory, did you want to see a > > new diff for placing the configure options into a variable? > > > I went ahead

Bug#594115: marked as done (RM: kfreebsd-7/7.3-7 (testing))

Your message dated Mon, 23 Aug 2010 23:53:13 +0200 with message-id <4c72edc9.7000...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#594115: RM: kfreebsd-7/7.3-7 (testing) has caused the Debian Bug report #594115, regarding RM: kfreebsd-7/7.3-7 (testing) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t

Re: synaptic and squeeze

On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 14:27:00 +0200, Michael Vogt wrote: > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 05:14:14PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > Hi Michael, > Hi, > > sorry for the late reply, I was on vacation for a couple of days. > > > synaptic 0.70~pre1 was uploaded to unstable a few days ago, do you > >

RM: egoboo/testing -- ROM; incompatable with squeeze egoboo-data

Hi, Please remove egoboo from squeeze, it is currently incompatible with egoboo-data and neither are really release quality. Thanks, Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Moodle package update request

On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Tomasz Muras wrote: > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: >> On 08/16/2010 10:55 PM, Tomasz Muras wrote: >> If the license is ok, then there is no need to repackage the source. >> But, it you're going to repackage the source, I'll wait for the ne

Approval to upload adtool 1.3.3-2

Hi, Please consider the following diff for fixing bug #593744, severity important (not yet uploaded to sid). I have not fixed the two other outstanding issues: no debian/source/format and not-quite-up-to-date standards version. If you would like them fixed in this release, I'm happy to do so in a

Bug#592697: unblock: java-common/0.40

reopen 592697 thanks Hi, thanks for unblocking 0.39 but my upload did not work as expected because the arch any packages got downgraded on mips. I have introduced an epoch for the arch any packages now. The upload includes the switch to openjdk on powerpcsce as discussed at

Processed: retitle 592697 to unblock: java-common/0.40

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 592697 unblock: java-common/0.40 Bug #592697 [release.debian.org] unblock: java-common/0.39 Changed Bug title to 'unblock: java-common/0.40' from 'unblock: java-common/0.39' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you nee

Processed: unblock: java-common/0.40

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 592697 Bug #592697 {Done: "Adam D. Barratt" } [release.debian.org] unblock: java-common/0.39 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 592697: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=592697

Bug#594115: RM: kfreebsd-7/7.3-7 (testing)

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm We plan to only keep kfreebsd-8 in squeeze, to simplify maintenance of the port, especially on the security side. However we would like to keep kfreebsd-7 in unstable only for regression testing.

Re: binNMU order of ObjC/GNUstep packages

On 08/23/2010 08:33 PM, Yavor Doganov wrote: > Mehdi Dogguy wrote: >> That said, you could also set "good" dependencies like what has >> been done for OCaml packages for instance and make them not >> installable if it doesn't match your criteria > > Interesting. Is dh-ocaml the right package to l

Re: what to do about aegir-provision

On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 10:51 -0400, The Anarcat wrote: > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 01:56:55PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Mon, August 23, 2010 09:41, The Anarcat wrote: > > > In fact, we are very close to getting 0.4 out the door. That release > > > will be maintained for stability and securi

Bug#592421: unblock: groovy/1.7.4-1

Hi Adam, On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >        317 files changed, 12971 insertions(+), 4237 deletions(-) > > which is saner but was still a pain to review. yes I agree. > The changelog suggests that the fix for that bug was simply the addition > of "default-jdk" to t

Re: Please unblock dctrl-tools 2.14.1

On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 21:52 +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote: > Please unblock dctrl-tools 2.14.1. > > This is a translation update with the following additional changes: > > * I changed one string to make it easier to translate. The > included translation updates all incorporate this c

Re: Please consider migrating gearman-interface 0.13.2-2 to testing

Hi Adam, thanks very much for taking a look! On Aug 21, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2010-08-21 at 09:17 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote: >> * debian/rules: moving tarball .c files out of the way so swig will >> rebuild and ship the .py files. (Closes: #593642) > > So far

Please unblock dctrl-tools 2.14.1

Please unblock dctrl-tools 2.14.1. This is a translation update with the following additional changes: * I changed one string to make it easier to translate. The included translation updates all incorporate this change. * I updated Standards-Version with no packaging changes. * All p

Re: binNMU order of ObjC/GNUstep packages

Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > That said, you could also set "good" dependencies like what has been > done for OCaml packages for instance and make them not installable > if it doesn't match your criteria Interesting. Is dh-ocaml the right package to look at? If it's not too hard, it'll be nice to impleme

Re: please update drush to 3.1-2 in squeeze

On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 10:53 -0400, The Anarcat wrote: > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 01:46:12PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, August 23, 2010 09:32, The Anarcat wrote: [...] > > > The full diff from 3.1-1 is attached. It does include some unrelated > > > changes (remove an extra

Bug#594098: marked as done (unblock: darcs-buildpackage/0.5.12.2)

Your message dated Mon, 23 Aug 2010 19:23:45 +0100 with message-id <1282587825.20979.250.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net> and subject line Re: Bug#594098: unblock: darcs-buildpackage/0.5.12.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #594098, regarding unblock: darcs-buildpackage/0.5.12.2 to be

Re: [v-admins] Bug#592506: What to do about libtest-harness-perl?

On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 16:00, gregor herrmann wrote: > I have no idea if this is enough or not; Nicholas and v.nix.is, what > do you think? I didn't track down what commits exactly were pertinent to fixing this, I just did a log from 3.21 to the master at the time and picked all the pertinent on

Re: Updating system-config-printer

On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:44:57AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 18:36:18 +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > > > Hi release team, > > system-config-printer in Squeeze is quiet outdated (1.0.0). I've prepared a > > new > > upstream version (1.2.3) in experimental some time ago:

Re: Upcoming freeze-exceptions: acl & sane-backends

Julien Cristau wrote: Hi, >> Ping? > > #590240 is still open, I thought that was a prerequisite... Yes, indeed, it is. So a new version of acl would be OK for the release team? Nathan, what's the status on your end? JB. -- Julien BLACHE | Debian, because code matters more Debian & GNU

Re: Gnash 0.8.8 has just been released - Asking for an exception to the freeze

[Miriam Ruiz] > Gnash 0.8.8 has just been released today [1]. I think that the big > improvements and the lack of reverse dependencies might make it a > suitable candidate for an exclusion to the freeze. Moving Gnash 0.8.8 > to Squeeze won't affect any other package. It would affect Debian Edu po

Re: please unblock openbsd-inetd 0.20080125-5

On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 18:35 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > openbsd-inetd (0.20080125-5) unstable; urgency=medium > > * Added --oknodo to the init script. (Closes: #592582) The package doesn't appear to contain any changes to the init script: changelog |6 ++ control |2 +- 2 files

Bug#594098: unblock: darcs-buildpackage/0.5.12.2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock All the RC bugs seem fixed in darcs-buildpackage, but it doesn't migrate. It's not clear to me what the problem is, maybe it needs to be forced in somehow? Cheers, Moritz -- System

Re: please unblock munin 1.4.5-2

On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 18:40 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > + * munin-plugins-extra: conflicts with lenny's munin-node (Closes: #590630) > + * Bump standards-version to 3.9.1, no changes necessary. The first changelog entry is slightly misleading, given that it's a Replaces. :) Unblocked. Regard

Re: What to do about libtest-harness-perl?

On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 17:41:12 +0100, Nicholas Bamber wrote: > I am digging deeper but apart from confirming that the issues are > real and fixed by 3.22 I have not got anything yet. I am trying to > build what a patched 3.21 would be and get a more informed opinion > but the required patch does loo

Bug#594097: unblock: fbi/2.07-5

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package fbi. It properly limits the archs to our Linux based ports (with the exception of s390). (#593400) The old broken KFreeBSD and Hurd binaries have been removed by FTP

Bug#579795: apt transition

2010/8/21 Julien Cristau : > We're (finally) getting ready to start this. Can you provide an outline > of the changes you want to get in? Basically the package which is bumming around in experimental plus a few bugfixes which are in the pipeline and (hopefully a lot) of updated translations Chris

Re: What to do about libtest-harness-perl?

I am digging deeper but apart from confirming that the issues are real and fixed by 3.22 I have not got anything yet. I am trying to build what a patched 3.21 would be and get a more informed opinion but the required patch does look big to me. gregor herrmann wrote: On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 15:0

please unblock munin 1.4.5-2

Hi, --- munin-1.4.5/debian/changelog +++ munin-1.4.5/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +munin (1.4.5-2) unstable; urgency=low + + [ Tom Feiner ] + * munin-plugins-extra: conflicts with lenny's munin-node (Closes: #590630) + * Bump standards-version to 3.9.1, no changes necessary. + + -- Tom Fei

please unblock openbsd-inetd 0.20080125-5

openbsd-inetd (0.20080125-5) unstable; urgency=medium * Added --oknodo to the init script. (Closes: #592582) -- Marco d'Itri Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:33:09 +0200 -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: What to do about libtest-harness-perl?

On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 15:03:02 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > >> The bug concerns how the prove utility handles testing scripts > > >> directly. Anyway other members of the Debian Perl group will want to > > >> express an opinion. > > > Did any of them do so and simply fail to Cc -release? :-) >

Re: libdb5, mips and squeeze

On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:15:14AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > libdb5 has been failing to build on mips and mipsel for over 5 weeks, > and apparently nobody cares. > I have multiple packages linked to it which have not been able to move > to testing, should I rebuild them for tpu or can I expect t

Re: freeze exception for gcc-4.5 (i386, amd64 only)

2010/8/23, Pierre Habouzit : > It's just that LTO isn't that a compelling reason, it's not 100% > production ready. The plugin infrastructure is though. But you're citing > dragonegg, and last time I checked, you had to patch gcc to export one > more symbol. If you haven't applied that patch (if it

Re: please update drush to 3.1-2 in squeeze

On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 01:46:12PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, August 23, 2010 09:32, The Anarcat wrote: > > I have just uploaded a new version of drush to unstable: > > > > http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/drush/news/20100822T173214Z.html > > > > This fixes a major usability is

Re: Freeze exception: foomatic-filters 4.0.5

Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Julien Cristau wrote: >> Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: >>> So three solutions IMHO: >>> >>> i) keep foomatic-filters in "lenny-style", with Chris as maintainer >>> (basically foomatic-* MIA), no update towards Squeeze; >>> ii) upload foomatic-filters 4.0.5-* with the dp

Re: what to do about aegir-provision

On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 01:56:55PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, August 23, 2010 09:41, The Anarcat wrote: > > In fact, we are very close to getting 0.4 out the door. That release > > will be maintained for stability and security fixes, and would be a much > > better candidate fo

Re: Freeze exception for haskell-leksah-server_0.8.0.6-2

Hi again. Excerpts from Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva's message of Seg Ago 23 10:13:07 -0300 2010: (...) > I just uploaded haskell-leksah-server_0.8.0.6-2, which fixes an RC bug in > 0.8.0.6-1. The patch is attached. It seems I haven't fixed the bug completely in 0.8.0.6-2, so I uploaded 0.8.0.6-

Freeze exception for haskell-leksah-server_0.8.0.6-2

Hi, I just uploaded haskell-leksah-server_0.8.0.6-2, which fixes an RC bug in 0.8.0.6-1. The patch is attached. Greetings. -- marcot http://wiki.debian.org/MarcoSilva haskell-leksah-server_0.8.0.6-2.diff Description: Binary data signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Please unblock libgtk2-spell-perl/1.03-5

On Mon, August 23, 2010 11:06, Chris Butler wrote: > I've just uploaded libgtk2-spell-perl 1.03-5 to fix RC bug #591129. The > only change is adding a missing build-dependency, required by the test > suite, debdiff attached. Unblocked. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-

Re: what to do about aegir-provision

Hi, On Mon, August 23, 2010 09:41, The Anarcat wrote: > In fact, we are very close to getting 0.4 out the door. That release > will be maintained for stability and security fixes, and would be a much > better candidate for Squeeze than 0.3. > > Therefore, my question is: what should we do with Aeg

Request for (pre-)approval of FAI 3.4.0

Hi, FAI version 3.4.0 is sitting in NEW currently: http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/fai_3.4.0.html I'm the release manager of the FAI 3.4 release(s) and asked the FTP team to let FAI through NEW, Jörg suggested to get approval by the release team beforehand. Here I am. :) Some background informa

Re: freeze exception for gcc-4.5 (i386, amd64 only)

On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 02:05:25PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 23.08.2010 13:30, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > >On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 01:21:04PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > >>On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:05:32AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > >>>On 21.08.2010 14:56, Julien Cristau wrote: > >>>

Re: please update drush to 3.1-2 in squeeze

Hi, On Mon, August 23, 2010 09:32, The Anarcat wrote: > I have just uploaded a new version of drush to unstable: > > http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/drush/news/20100822T173214Z.html > > This fixes a major usability issue due to a mis-packaging I originally > did (forgot to include a file) describe

Re: synaptic and squeeze

On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 05:14:14PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > Hi Michael, Hi, sorry for the late reply, I was on vacation for a couple of days. > synaptic 0.70~pre1 was uploaded to unstable a few days ago, do you > consider it a candidate for squeeze? I'm asking because it's one of the > re

Re: dk-milter/dk-filter

On Sun, August 22, 2010 20:46, Mike Markley wrote: > I've prepared a fix for an outstanding grave bug (#481072) in dk-filter > (the sole binary package from the dk-milter source package). I'd like to > upload it for inclusion into squeeze. The package hasn't been in squeeze for several months now,

Re: freeze exception for gcc-4.5 (i386, amd64 only)

On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 02:05:25PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 23.08.2010 13:30, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > >On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 01:21:04PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > >>On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:05:32AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > >>>On 21.08.2010 14:56, Julien Cristau wrote: > >>>

Re: freeze exception for gcc-4.5 (i386, amd64 only)

On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 02:02:35PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 23.08.2010 13:21, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > >On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:05:32AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > >>On 21.08.2010 14:56, Julien Cristau wrote: > >>>On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 19:33:12 +0200, Arthur Loiret wrote: > >>> > >

Re: Freeze for LLVM packages

On Wed, August 18, 2010 11:50, Arthur Loiret wrote: > 2010/8/18, Adam D. Barratt : >>> This package still needs a bit of work, but not on this >>> side. >> >> Ah, I'd assumed everything was basically ready to go and just waiting to >> be uploaded. How much is "a bit of work"? One issue I did notic

Re: freeze exception for gcc-4.5 (i386, amd64 only)

On 23.08.2010 13:30, Pierre Habouzit wrote: On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 01:21:04PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:05:32AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: On 21.08.2010 14:56, Julien Cristau wrote: On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 19:33:12 +0200, Arthur Loiret wrote: Now, to be clea

Re: Upcoming freeze-exceptions: acl & sane-backends

On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 10:42:42 +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote: > Ping? > #590240 is still open, I thought that was a prerequisite... Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: freeze exception for gcc-4.5 (i386, amd64 only)

On 23.08.2010 13:21, Pierre Habouzit wrote: On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:05:32AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: On 21.08.2010 14:56, Julien Cristau wrote: On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 19:33:12 +0200, Arthur Loiret wrote: Now, to be clear, what nice things would gcc-4.5 bring to our users? There is a c

Re: freeze exception for gcc-4.5 (i386, amd64 only)

On 23.08.2010 13:45, Roger Leigh wrote: On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 10:03:05AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:05:32AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: On 21.08.2010 14:56, Julien Cristau wrote: On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 19:33:12 +0200, Arthur Loiret wrote: Now, to be clear, what

Bug#594056: future unblock: libdbd-sqlite3-perl/1.29-3

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Dear Release Team Please unblock package libdbd-sqlite3-perl This is a request to unblock libdbd-sqlite3-perl if we can upload it. Niko Tyni found a patch for the FTBFS in #59

Re: freeze exception for gcc-4.5 (i386, amd64 only)

On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:45:35PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 10:03:05AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:05:32AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > On 21.08.2010 14:56, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > >On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 19:33:12 +0200, Arthur Loir

Re: freeze exception for gcc-4.5 (i386, amd64 only)

On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 10:03:05AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:05:32AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > On 21.08.2010 14:56, Julien Cristau wrote: > > >On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 19:33:12 +0200, Arthur Loiret wrote: > > > > > >>Now, to be clear, what nice things would gcc-4.

Re: freeze exception for gcc-4.5 (i386, amd64 only)

On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 01:21:04PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:05:32AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > On 21.08.2010 14:56, Julien Cristau wrote: > > >On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 19:33:12 +0200, Arthur Loiret wrote: > > > > > >>Now, to be clear, what nice things would gc

Re: freeze exception for gcc-4.5 (i386, amd64 only)

On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:05:32AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 21.08.2010 14:56, Julien Cristau wrote: > >On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 19:33:12 +0200, Arthur Loiret wrote: > > > >>Now, to be clear, what nice things would gcc-4.5 bring to our users? > >>There is a complete list here [0], but those

Re: freeze exception for gcc-4.5 (i386, amd64 only)

On 23.08.2010 12:03, Mike Hommey wrote: On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:41:40AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: On 23.08.2010 10:03, Mike Hommey wrote: On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:05:32AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: On 21.08.2010 14:56, Julien Cristau wrote: On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 19:33:12 +0200, Ar

Please unblock libgtk2-spell-perl/1.03-5

I've just uploaded libgtk2-spell-perl 1.03-5 to fix RC bug #591129. The only change is adding a missing build-dependency, required by the test suite, debdiff attached. -- Chris Butler GnuPG Key ID: 4096R/49E3ACD3 diff -Nru libgtk2-spell-perl-1.03/debian/changelog libgtk2-spell-perl-1.03/debian

Re: freeze exception for gcc-4.5 (i386, amd64 only)

On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:41:40AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 23.08.2010 10:03, Mike Hommey wrote: > >On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:05:32AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > >>On 21.08.2010 14:56, Julien Cristau wrote: > >>>On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 19:33:12 +0200, Arthur Loiret wrote: > >>> > N

Re: freeze exception for gcc-4.5 (i386, amd64 only)

On 23.08.2010 10:03, Mike Hommey wrote: On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:05:32AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: On 21.08.2010 14:56, Julien Cristau wrote: On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 19:33:12 +0200, Arthur Loiret wrote: Now, to be clear, what nice things would gcc-4.5 bring to our users? There is a compl

Re: binNMU order of ObjC/GNUstep packages

On 08/23/2010 10:34 AM, Yavor Doganov wrote: > В Mon, 23 Aug 2010 07:55:44 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy написа: >> The transition monitor shows that order. If the order inferred from >> the build-dependencies is incorrect, then there is a problem in >> your packages. > > There is no problem with the build-

Re: Upcoming freeze-exceptions: acl & sane-backends

Hi, > Julien Cristau wrote: > > Hi, > >> I'm not sure I understand that bug, how you're planning on fixing it, or >> why you need to use setfacl instead of udev-acl as many other devices >> nodes already do. > > udev-acl is meant for ConsoleKit integration and doesn't do anything for > you if you

what to do about aegir-provision

Hi, I am one of the upstream developers of the Aegir project and the maintainer of the Debian package. Some time ago, I have uploaded version 0.3-2.2, which bundles the upstream 0.3 version. That version is now very old. Nobody uses is in production, and even though the subsequent releases are al

Re: binNMU order of ObjC/GNUstep packages

В Mon, 23 Aug 2010 07:55:44 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy написа: > The transition monitor shows that order. If the order inferred from > the build-dependencies is incorrect, then there is a problem in your > packages. There is no problem with the build-dependencies. The only problem is when a package gets

please update drush to 3.1-2 in squeeze

Hi, I have just uploaded a new version of drush to unstable: http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/drush/news/20100822T173214Z.html This fixes a major usability issue due to a mis-packaging I originally did (forgot to include a file) described in #588639. The full diff from 3.1-1 is attached. It does

Re: want to get packages into Sqeeze

Hi Adam, On Sun, 22.08.2010 at 15:58:24 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > As I said above, it's unlikely that a package not even in unstable will > get in to squeeze now. I fully understand, but also thought that the program itself is both benign and valuable to the project. Anyway, if you say n

Re: freeze exception for gcc-4.5 (i386, amd64 only)

On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:05:32AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 21.08.2010 14:56, Julien Cristau wrote: > >On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 19:33:12 +0200, Arthur Loiret wrote: > > > >>Now, to be clear, what nice things would gcc-4.5 bring to our users? > >>There is a complete list here [0], but those