Carlos,
On 08/06/2010 10:48 AM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
I think we do agree that it will be included into stable for the last time.
Under which metrics or evaluation process is this decision being made?
basically the criteria listed on [0] (which is again not entirely
up-to-date, th
If it's decided to release Squeeze with clamav, I think it would be good to
keep python-clamav too. The main use case is for admins who have written
their own scripts.
I don't think it will be that difficult to keep up. Clamav upstream is doing a
better job with maintaining ABI compatibility.
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 12:47:54PM +0200, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> > c-icap links against libclamav and is thus affected by #577013. As such
> > it needs to be moved to volatile.debian.org and blocked out of stable
> > with a RC blocker bug.
> >
> > Alternatively the clamav module could
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hey,
there's a bunch of packages in tpu which move to testing every other
britney run, then get removed on the next one because they're not in sid
(aiui).
partial list:
libgtk2-notify-perl/mipsel
libio-aio-perl/kfreebsd-i386
picprog/s390
splashy/s390
tijm
On 0, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm uploading a new revision of clutter that fixes an RC bug. The
> debdiff is minimal as you can see below. Please let it migrate.
>
The diff looks sane. Please go ahead.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-re
Hi,
I'm uploading a new revision of clutter that fixes an RC bug. The
debdiff is minimal as you can see below. Please let it migrate.
Thanks,
Emilio
Index: debian/patches/series
===
--- debian/patches/series (revisión: 24814)
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 06:46:04PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> With regards to #554788, is there a chance that this could be fixed, or
> even replied to? I really would rather not remove courier from testing.
Based on recent policy discussions, it appears one possible workaround which
will gene
Your message dated Fri, 6 Aug 2010 20:24:35 -0400
with message-id <20100807002435.gk3...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#592029: nmu: jed_1:0.99.19-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #592029,
regarding nmu: jed_1:0.99.19-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Owner: pkg-jed-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
The bug #575284 in ncurses made the built of jed failed. Hence, the
package has to be rebuild with the newer version.
nmu jed_1:0.99.19-2 . mips
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 12:12:05AM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> I like to see these three packages migrating to testing:
>
Hi,
As you can potentially see from running grep-excuses, or reading the
mail I sent to d-d-a carfully, it's already unblocked.
Thanks,
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 00:12:05 +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I like to see these three packages migrating to testing:
>
> * audacity: version 1.3.12-4 has an empty debug package. Therefore
> audacity-dbg was rendered useless. 1.3.12-5 fixes this.
>
$ grep-excuses audacity
audacity (1
Hi,
I planned to publish a new deborphan release in mid August as I did not
expect the freeze to happen that early in late August ;) This new
release would include a lot of refactoring and rewriting of some parts
so that a diff would be larger than the code.
deborphan is one of those tools where
Hi,
I like to see these three packages migrating to testing:
* audacity: version 1.3.12-4 has an empty debug package. Therefore
audacity-dbg was rendered useless. 1.3.12-5 fixes this.
* vlc: version 1.1.2-1 brings the new upstream bug fix release (1.1.1 ->
1.1.2) and re-enable the modplug plugin
On Fri, August 6, 2010 15:31, Adam Borowski wrote:
> Somehow, even though crawl 2:0.7.1-3 has been uploaded and accepted on
> 9:02 this morning, it hasn't been picked up by either of the two dinstall
> runs since then. While buildds swiftly did their work and all arches
> except hurd-i386 and -por
Hi,
I have just uploaded busybox version 1:1.17.1-2 into unstable (it was
previously in experimental), which supports Hurd and GNU/kFreeBSD.
As already agreed with Otavio, could you please unblock this package?
Thanks,
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aur
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 07:23:33PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Our proposal would therefore be that we look again at the number and
> severity of outstanding issues related to moving to Perl 5.12 once the
> Python transition has finished and evaluate at that point whether it
> would be feasible
Hi!
Somehow, even though crawl 2:0.7.1-3 has been uploaded and accepted on 9:02
this morning, it hasn't been picked up by either of the two dinstall runs
since then. While buildds swiftly did their work and all arches except
hurd-i386 and -ports are already built, all the results (including sever
Processing changes file: php5_5.2.6.dfsg.1-1+lenny9_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: php5_5.2.6.dfsg.1-1+lenny9_alpha.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: php5_5.2.6.dfsg.1-1+lenny9_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: php5_5.2.6.dfsg.1-1+lenny9_arm.changes
ACCEPT
Pr
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 13:43:40 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> Greetings RMs,
>
> I have been corresponding with upstream for xl2tpd, and they just last
> night released a new minor upstream version (1.2.7, with 1.2.6 being the
> current version in Debian). I'd like pre-approval to upload t
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 04:11:28PM -0400, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, July 29, 2010 10:02, Guido Günther wrote:
> > I'd like to upload a new version of libvirt to stable fixing two issues:
> >
> > * CVE-2010-2242: Apply a source port mapping to virtual network
> > masquerading
>
On Fr, 2010-08-06 at 14:54 -0400, Philipp Kern wrote:
>
> > Others
> > ==
> > ndiswrapper
> > ---
> > I guess the ndiswrapper in unstable should be blocked again, the only
> > additions it contains are broken support for kernel 2.6.35 (I did not
> > expect the freeze now, so I thought
As far as I can tell, it can be upgraded to OAuth, and I could do it.
But we are blocked by #581601 which is the library that is need for C
OAuth unless I program the entire thing from scratch (Something I won't
be doing, sorry ;)
That ITP hasn't been acted on in over 3 months.. So we either wait
Sune,
On 08/06/2010 03:01 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote:
Add two new packages, bluedevil and libbluedevil, which I and other of
the debian KDE people have been testing heavily over the last
weeks.
[...]
It is a straight off port to perlqt4 of the perlqt3 code shipped in
lenny. It has been waiting for
Hi.
Excerpts from Joachim Breitner's message of Sex Ago 06 12:03:01 -0300 2010:
(...)
> Am Freitag, den 06.08.2010, 11:25 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e
> Silva:
> > Excerpts from Joachim Breitner's message of Qui Ago 05 10:48:18 -0300 2010:
> > (...)
> > > I think something went wrong with t
On 2010-08-06, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Sune,
>
> On 08/06/2010 02:07 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote:
>> My plans for this weekend was
>> - to make sure that apps using the KDE platform actually knows wether or
>> not
>> they are online (currently, in a mixed NM and /e/n/i setup, many apps
>> think
>
Sune,
On 08/06/2010 02:07 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote:
My plans for this weekend was
- to make sure that apps using the KDE platform actually knows wether or not
they are online (currently, in a mixed NM and /e/n/i setup, many apps think
they are offline when using the /e/n/i defined interf
Hi,
On 08/06/2010 02:25 PM, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
A few comments here
APT (keep de...@l.d.o in CC for this)
=
Will the APT 0.7.26 transition still be started? (mvo reported it in
April, 579795) [and it can fix potential segfaults in python-apt].
yes
Hi
My plans for this weekend was
- to make sure that apps using the KDE platform actually knows wether or not
they are online (currently, in a mixed NM and /e/n/i setup, many apps think
they are offline when using the /e/n/i defined interfaces, and the state is
unknown in many pur
Iustin,
On 08/06/2010 01:11 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
I uploaded these two packages yesterday, and I was hoping they will get
into testing. But I see now both marked as "Not touching package due to
block request by freeze". Even though they were uploaded yesterday :)
The only difference from curren
On Fr, 2010-08-06 at 14:44 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
>
> Current status
> ==
>
> As mentioned in the previous mail, we would freeze when various
> transitions are completed or being handled. We now feel that this stage
> has been reached. This means that we have stopped the automati
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> limit package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'
> # Postponed to squeeze+1
> tags 573187 + squeeze-ignore
Bug #573187 [r
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> limit package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'
> # Postponed to squeeze+1
> tags 573187 + squeeze-ignore
Bug #573187 [r
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> limit package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.de
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 12:51:47 -0400
Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > Since I reported this 3 weeks ago, there is no progress and upstream
> > > seems to be dead, see http://twitux.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/twitux/
> > > So, I'll propose twitux package from testing once.
> >
> > I agree with your as
Hello Philipp, *,
On Friday 06 August 2010 19:17:59 Philipp Kern wrote:
> > Anyhow, the thing is that probably nobody ever ran Aqsis on HPPA, the
> > more professional users of Aqsis would surely use top-notch hardware
> > and they won't bother with versions 4 years old. More informal users
> > w
Greetings RMs,
I have been corresponding with upstream for xl2tpd, and they just last
night released a new minor upstream version (1.2.7, with 1.2.6 being the
current version in Debian). I'd like pre-approval to upload the new
upstream version (diffstat and compressed complete diff are attached)
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 09:08 -0700, Rodrigo Gallardo wrote:
> I agree with your assesment, please go ahead.
>
> Luke, I think you were interested in this package. If you have the
> time to take over its upstream let me know and we can work on updating
> it so it can go back into testing.
>
> Other
Manuel,
On 08/06/2010 11:26 AM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
Aqsis
=
Aqsis's version in stable and testing is 1.2, and 1.6 in unstable that I
created recently. 1.6 is almost 1 year old and 1.2 more than 3 years old
(which will probably be 1+ years and 4- years respectively, by the
Hi,
I uploaded these two packages yesterday, and I was hoping they will get
into testing. But I see now both marked as "Not touching package due to
block request by freeze". Even though they were uploaded yesterday :)
The only difference from current testing version is the new -dbg
package, which
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 12:57:55 -0400, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Would the release team vet an upload of 3.5.3, allowing it to migrate to
> squeeze? If not, I can live with 3.5.2, but I suspect usptream's support
> team would not exactly be thrilled about that state of affairs.
>
What kind of dif
So, with the freeze now a fact, I'm a bit in dubio about what to do with
beid.
The version currently in testing, 3.5.2, works on the architectures
where it isn't fundamentally buggy (i.e., all non-64bit architectures).
But it doesn't work properly on others. There're also a few build issues
on so
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 09:08:10 -0700, Rodrigo Gallardo wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 11:18:51AM -0400, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> > > This package is twitter client, but it seems to lack OAuth support.
> > > Twitter will drop Authentication method like Basic Auth other than OAuth,
> > > so thi
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 18:02:15 +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Hi, please remove re2 from squeeze. Upstream hasn't comitted to a stable
> ABI yet.
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/591935
>
hint added.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 07:00:00PM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> Neil McGovern wrote:
> > As mentioned in the previous mail, we would freeze when various
> > transitions are completed or being handled.
>
> I sincerely hope you haven't forgetten #561944, and that ditching
> GNUstep packages out of
Hi, please remove re2 from squeeze. Upstream hasn't comitted to a stable
ABI yet.
http://bugs.debian.org/591935
Thanks,
SR
--
Stefano Rivera
http://tumbleweed.org.za/
H: +27 21 465 6908 C: +27 72 419 8559 UCT: x3127
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
wi
Neil McGovern wrote:
> As mentioned in the previous mail, we would freeze when various
> transitions are completed or being handled.
I sincerely hope you haven't forgetten #561944, and that ditching
GNUstep packages out of squeeze is not your plan.
It is somewhat depressing that we've been waitin
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 11:18:51AM -0400, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> > This package is twitter client, but it seems to lack OAuth support.
> > Twitter will drop Authentication method like Basic Auth other than OAuth,
> > so this should support OAuth until 16th August (it means twitux would be
> >
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:54:12PM -0400, Don Armstrong wrote:
> Release team: if you think this bug makes runit-run unreleaseable,
> please indicate as such; otherwise I think it's reasonable for the
> maintainer to downgrade the severity of this bug if the maintainer
> feels that it is releasable
Hi,
On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 07:56:01 +0900
Hideki Yamane wrote:
> package: twitux
> version: 0.69-4
> severity: grave
>
> This package is twitter client, but it seems to lack OAuth support.
> Twitter will drop Authentication method like Basic Auth other than OAuth,
> so this should support OAuth
Hello,
(I'm not subscribed to the list, please CC).
Following the announcement about the freeze, this e-mail is a request to
either ship in Squeeze the newer versions of the Aqsis [1] (an off-line
software renderer, unlike OpenGL or the like which do it in real time and on
a window on the scre
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:16 AM, Tom Marble wrote:
> On 07/28/2010 06:44 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> OpenJDK was just uploaded to unstable, based on the IcedTea6-1.8.1
>> release [1]. This version addresses some security issues,
>> and this version should be shipped with squeeze
> A group of
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 17:02:28 +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> Release team: Could you remove it from testing, please?
>
hint added.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 05:02:28PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> I do not think it makes sense to release xprintmon in squeeze.
> (Actually I think noone but me uses it, so I'm also considering
> to have it removed from unstable, but I most likely will not
> think enough about that before squeez
Hello guys,
As requested this morning, I'd like to highlight the situation of Atlas.
Atlas is a very important library in the numerical computing world even
used in software like openoffice or Koffice.
For now, the version we have in testing is outdated, old and pretty much
unmaintained/unmaintain
Package: xprintmon
Version: 0.0.3-1
Severity: serious
I do not think it makes sense to release xprintmon in squeeze.
(Actually I think noone but me uses it, so I'm also considering
to have it removed from unstable, but I most likely will not
think enough about that before squeeze is released).
Re
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:30 PM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Dear HPPA porters, dear HPPA port users,
>
> the Release Team is currently wondering if it makes sense to release with
> HPPA as a regular stable architecture with squeeze. It might be that
> it is not up to the standards of a regular Debian r
Your message dated Fri, 06 Aug 2010 10:50:13 -0400
with message-id <4c5c2125.8050...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#591916: nmu: webkit_1.2.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #591916,
regarding nmu: webkit_1.2.3-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
On 08/06/2010 10:34 AM, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
As you can see, these are mostly documentation fixes and tidy-ups, with
a feature addition which fixes an security bug (#475730). I plan to
finalise work on this last issue this weekend and I'd be grateful if you
could approve its transition into
Hi,
I've been working on a new release of request-tracker3.8 for a few weeks.
The current changelog looks like this:
request-tracker3.8 (3.8.8-2~test.2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
* Remove dependency on mysql-client-5.0 and postgresql-client-8.3 which
is no longer available, leaving a depende
It will also fix the symptoms of #586404.
--
ciao,
Marco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100806140418.gb20...@bongo.bofh.it
On 08/06/2010 10:00 AM, Frans Pop wrote:
I uploaded a new version of debmirror yesterday with minor changes, but
including one fairly important bugfix (#590667).
Please accept for Squeeze.
TIA,
FJP
pk...@asterix:~$ grep-excuses debmirror
debmirror (1:2.4.4 to 1:2.4.5)
Maintainer: Frans
I uploaded a new version of debmirror yesterday with minor changes, but
including one fairly important bugfix (#590667).
Please accept for Squeeze.
TIA,
FJP
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.d
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hey,
For some reason some people started experiencing crashes with
webkit-based browsers after upgrades these last two weeks. We could
not really understand what was causing it, and I was n
Nikita,
On 08/06/2010 02:47 AM, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
I'm afraid that as this hasn't started it's transition yet, it seems
that there won't be space in the queue for this one, so I'm afraid we
can't handle the transition.
Apologies for the inconvenience,
:(
I'm just a few days ba
On 06/08/10 at 07:55 -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
> According to
> https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=sagemath;ver=3.0.5dfsg-5.1;arch=alpha;stamp=1263382158
> the build of sagemath 3.0.5dfsg-5.1 failed due to a missing dependency on
> libiml-dev . This package is now available. Could so
According to
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=sagemath;ver=3.0.5dfsg-5.1;arch=alpha;stamp=1263382158
the build of sagemath 3.0.5dfsg-5.1 failed due to a missing dependency on
libiml-dev . This package is now available. Could someone please reschedule
a build on alpha for sagemath?
thanks
ra
Le 6 août 2010 à 03:46, dann frazier a écrit :
> On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 03:30:41AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
>> Dear HPPA porters, dear HPPA port users,
>>
>> the Release Team is currently wondering if it makes sense to release with
>> HPPA as a regular stable architecture with squeeze. It mig
>> > Why not use a RC severity then? (not intending to push people, just
>> > to make it clear when checking the bugs list).
>> IIRC, the d-d-a mail asked to use normal severity. But maybe in this
>> case it is better to use RC severity now. The release team can still
>> adjust it as necessary.
68 matches
Mail list logo
